BIG vs ACC in Basketball

Today I aim to objectively explore the traditions of both these conferences in Basketball and aim to put the debate to rest as to which conference is better. To do so, I will compare certain criteria which are important in determining the answer to our question and will include future conference members in analysis rather than current (i.e UMD will be representing the BIG). But the analysis will also try to compare the gains made by each conference from the realignment.

1. No. of National Championships:

ACC: 15 (Syracuse=1, Duke=4, UNC=5, NC-State=2, Louisville=3)

BIG: 11 (UMD=1, Mich.=1, MSU=2, Wisc.=1, OSU=1, Indiana=5)

Winner: ACC

By having won 4 more Nattys (exactly the difference of adding 2 former Big-East teams) ACC is the clear winner in this category.

2. No. of teams that have won the National Championship

ACC: 5

BIG: 6

Winner: BIG

BIG wins this battle by the narrowest of margins and had we gone to the old format, BIG would have won that as well by one. The teams that have won are listed in the previous criterion.

3. Total No. of Final Four appearances

ACC: 59

BIG: 51

Winner: ACC

Ahead by 8 final fours, ACC is the clear winner here with additions Louisville, 'Cuse, Pitt, and Notre Dame contributing 17 total where as BIG additions UMD and Rutgers only contribute a total of 3 Final Fours. So pre-realignment, BIG would have been the winner by 3.

4. No. of teams sent to the Final Four

ACC: 11 (Louisville, UVA, Syracuse, Duke, UNC, Pitt, State, FSU, Wake, Notre Dame, G-Tech)

BIG: 12 (UMD, Rutgers, Michigan, MSU, Wisconsin, OSU, Iowa, Minn., Indiana, Purdue, Illinios, PSU)

Winner: BIG

Again BIG wins by the narrowest of Margins and pre-realignment numbers would favor BIG by a margin of 2.

5. Most recent National Championship:

ACC: 2013 (Louisville)

BIG: 2002 (Maryland)

Winner: ACC

ACC blows by the BIG in this category barring any changes this year.

6. Total No. of tournament appearances by teams in each conference

ACC: 350

BIG: 271

Winner: ACC

ACC wins this one by a mile and a half. New members of ACC contribute 132 of those appearances while new members of the BIG contribute 30 appearances. So before realignment, BIG would have actually been the winner by 28 appearances.

7. Overall NCAA tournament record/winning percentage of teams in each conference

ACC: 557-350 (0.614 winning pct.)

BIG: 414-267 (0.608 winning pct.)

Winner: TIE!

ACC looks like it should have won this by the edge of the needle and had it not been for Nebraska's 0-6 record in the NCAA tournament, BIG would have actually taken this one so for me it's too close to call. Add to the fact that former Big-East teams boosted ACC numbers like crazy and they still only managed to win by a narrow margin means it's not all numbers in this one.

8. No. of teams winning the conference tournament championship

ACC: 10

BIG: 6

Winner: ACC

Up until this point BIG was thought to be more even in power sharing but apparently not. Let's see if it's any different for regular season championship

9. No. of teams winning the conference regular season championship


BIG: 11

Winner: BIG

So the fact of the matter is anyone can theoretically win the conference tournament but when it comes to winning the regular season, it's not the same and BIG beats ACC in this category.

10. Most No. of National Championship won by one team

ACC: 5 (UNC)

BIG: 5 (Indiana)

Winner: Tie!

The second tie of this battle comes in exploring the biggest powerhouse in each conference and it seems they both have the same no. of Nattys.

Final Verdict: ACC: 5 BIG: 3; Tie:2

Short Conclusion: ACC is the better conference for basketball moving forward.

Long Conclusion(s):

ACC is top heavy with the top 6 teams in all categories representing ACC having a vast majority of the assets in the distribution

BIG is more diverse conference with more teams figuring into the mix of winning the conference and NCAA tournament games.

The realignment favors the BIG in terms of making the league more competitive and homogenous within the conference but when it comes to the national stage, it actually favors ACC in having more stud teams trying to compete for the National Title.

Had the realignment never happened, BIG would have been the winner of this analysis by at least 2 categories. Therefore historically, BIG was the better conference.

UMD's ability to make an impact in the national stage would have been hampered by the polarization of the ACC so it is actually beneficial for UMD to move to the BIG.

Hope you liked the analysis and if there are any other factors I missed, feel free to discuss them.

Anything deemed inappropriate will be deleted by an admin or moderator with the power to do so. The views of the above FanPost do not represent the beliefs of Testudo Times or Testudo Times' authors, nor are they the work of them.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Testudo Times

You must be a member of Testudo Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Testudo Times. You should read them.

Join Testudo Times

You must be a member of Testudo Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Testudo Times. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.