New NCAA Academic Requirements for 2016

This comes to us via ESPN's Mitch Sherman on the College Football recruiting blog. Here's the link to the New Eligibility standards. But I'll give you the readers digest below.

The new requirements go into effect in 2016, that is current 8th graders who will be entering their freshman year of high school in the fall. , and the most drastic change is:

Current initial-eligibility standards require entering freshmen to graduate high school with 16 core courses passed and a minimum 2.0 GPA matched with an ACT or SAT score on a sliding scale.

The 2016 standards mandate the same 16 core courses but stipulate that 10 must be completed by the start of the student's senior year of high school and that all 16 are finished in four years. So effectively say goodbye to the practice popular in basketball of reclassifying to enjoy a fifth year of high school.

And the minimum GPA jumps to 2.3.

More after the jump.

The biggest thing to come out of this is the addition of the "Academic Redshirt." Basically an Academic Redshirt is the same idea as the old Prop 48/16 partial qualifiers with the big difference being that players DO NOT lose a year of eligibility. Academic Redshirts can still practice with the team, they just cannot play during games. For those wondering the Academic Redshirt DOES count against the scholarship count, and the player would play the next year as a redshirt freshman.

But that's not the most eye popping nugget of information to come out of this:

A survey conducted by the NCAA indicated that of all freshmen football players to enroll at Division I schools last fall, approximately 40 percent would have failed to meet the 2016 requirements.

Now obviously that's taking a new standard and retroactively applying it to current players, I really don't think we can expect 40% of D1 players to be Academic Redshirts in 2016, but does anybody see the potential irony of an SEC player being called an "Academic" Redshirt?

They don't go on to say if a survey was done for basketball players, but it makes you wonder, will UCONN ever be able to field a team? (I kid, I kid)

If you assume none of the schools are cheating or operating in the grey area in recruiting. It does do a lot to balance out recruiting for schools with tougher academics. The argument that we didn't get kid XYZ because of academic reasons no longer rings as true as it once did.

Anything deemed inappropriate will be deleted by an admin or moderator with the power to do so. The views of the above FanPost do not represent the beliefs of Testudo Times or Testudo Times' authors, nor are they the work of them.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Testudo Times

You must be a member of Testudo Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Testudo Times. You should read them.

Join Testudo Times

You must be a member of Testudo Times to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Testudo Times. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.