National Signing Day 2012: Terps' Haul Pretty Good, Not Quite Great
If I've said it once, I've said it a hundred times: the class Maryland just wrapped up (well, almost wrapped up) yesterday really isn't half-bad. In fact, it's a pretty good haul, especially when you consider where they were a little over a month ago: 11th in the ACC by Rivals, well outside the top 50, with only one four-star commitment.
Fast-forward about 45 days or so, and look at everything that's changed. The Terrapins hired Mike Locksley, D.C.-area recruiting guru and one of the catalysts of the class' strong finish; then they picked up commitments from consensus four-star running back Wes Brown, Gatorade Player of the Year for D.C. Albert Reid, and four-star linebacker Abner Logan, who is recruiting for Maryland on Twitter and was called by Tom Lemming "the sleeper of all sleepers"; and to top it off, they became major players for local five-stars like Eddie Goldman, Ronald Darby, and Stefon Diggs, despite having been eliminated for months prior.
And so with Signing Day in the rearview mirror, Maryland's class checks in at 7th in the ACC by Rivals and a top 50 class by 247. That's not a bad turnaround.
Of course, it could've been better. Guys like D.J. Reader and Korren Kirven ended up elsewhere, as did Goldman and Darby; all indications being that Maryland never really had a chance with the latter two. And, of course, there's Dallas Griffiths, who flipped last-second from Maryland to Liberty, of all places. Signing Day itself, if you want to get technical, was a bit of a dud.
But hey, you can't win all of them. Recruiting isn't about one day; it's about 365 days. Keeping perspective, this class has to be considered a victory for Maryland - far from an overwhelming one, not necessarily one you want to brag about ... but a victory nonetheless. Now it's time to build.
That building happens to be possible in two ways. The first: landing Diggs. He didn't sign anywhere on Wednesday and won't do so until Feb. 10th; he's visiting College Park officially this weekend for the UNC game, which is a fairly big deal considering he's already been on a half-dozen unofficials here.
Getting Diggs on board would be an enormous boost, for obvious reasons. He'd push Maryland up several spots in recruiting rankings, without a doubt, but his real value might be even more. He's an extraordinary playmaker, the type of electric athlete teams like Clemson and Florida State have so vexed Maryland with in recent years. Rivals continually compares him to DeSean Jackson, and that's the type of talent he is. I'm not saying to get your hopes up, but it can still happen. If it does, Maryland will not only be getting an immense talent - they'll also be sending a message to all of the local stars that UMD is indeed a viable option for them, too.
Naturally, the other way to build on it - besides transfers, which is really all guesswork until they become official - is 2013 and 2014 recruiting. Edsall & Co. have already gotten an early start on the '13 class with a commitment from Jarrett Ross, the crazy fast corner from Delaware, and of course are in good with elite '14 corner Jalen Tabor, who figures to be one of the area's most highly-recruited prospects ever. 2013 doesn't have the high-end elite talent of the '12 class locally, but there are still a pretty rich harvest of four-star types - and even the potential five-star, particularly Derwin Gray and Kendall Fuller. We'll have more on that bunch later.
Things need to continue improving, yes. But this was largely a step in the right direction - particularly because you can start to see Maryland's personality forming. Offensively, they brought in a ton of talent at running back; Brown and Reid probably could've gone to any school in the ACC. And then look at their offensive linemen, Nick Brigham and Mike Madaras, and you'll see the base for a punishing, imposing ground game. Brigham, a guard, and Madaras, who could end up at either guard or right tackle, have both drawn huge praise for their prowess in run blocking. You usually don't look at recruiting classes in units, but if you look at the ground game foundation Maryland laid in the 2012 class, it's tough not to see a promising future in the running attack.
Remember that Edsall built his success at UConn largely through the ground attack; the same is true for Locksley at Illinois, where he rode Rashard Mendenhall to a Rose Bowl. I'm not sure if they're really looking to replicate past successes or that's just the way this turned out, but I'd be a little surprised if Maryland didn't prove to be a powerful rushing team in two years or so.
There's also an obvious, growing emphasis on speed and athleticism, especially if you're willing to look ahead to 2013. I'm not sure Randy Edsall realized just how far the deck was stacked against him in this regard until the Clemson and FSU games, where the Terrapins were just outclassed athletically; he didn't have quite enough time to drastically alter the class that quickly, but still: guys like Reid, Stefan Houston, and Levern Jacobs are athletic specimens and speed merchants (at least for their positions; Houston is a linebacker, remember). If you're willing to look ahead to 2013, you see Maryland going hard after guys like Ross, who ran a 4.43 as a sophomore, and Taivon Jacobs, brother of Levern and an Olympic-quality sprinter. Those are the types of guys who, while still raw and possessing other shortcomings, will be able to hang with the top-level athletes in the ACC.
The other big trend is, unsurprisingly, a much bigger focus on D.C. Landing Brown and Reid were huge boosts in this regard, but that wasn't all; it's clear that keeping kids at home was a priority not just with the elites, but at every level of the class. In the 2011 class, Maryland had exactly three D.C.-area commitments: Nate Clarke (originally in the 2010 class), A.J. Hendy, and Alex Twine. In the 2012 class, they doubled that - not to mention the host of Baltimore- and Frederick-area commitments, too.
Once Mike Locksley came aboard, you knew that was going to be a focus. And it was obvious right away that things were changing: the Terrapins hardly pushed for Reid at all the first time around, but became a major player once he opened things up; likewise, Levern Jacobs was on no one's radar until he committed. Throw in a sizable Good Counsel presence, and it's clear that the staff is taking local recruiting very, very seriously.
Defensively, the storyline isn't as obvious. Had the Terrapins brought in someone like D.J. Reader or Korren Kirven on the final day, it would've been easier to sell new defensive coordinator Brian Stewart's incoming transition to the 3-4. As it stands now, it seems like that personnel will have to wait another year. The big focus in the Terrapins defensive class was certainly at linebacker, where they brought in five potential contributors, including the four-star Logan. But they desperately needed depth there; I'm not sure that was a stylistic change so much as one born out of necessity.
There was some thought that Maryland's 2012 class would signal a sea change in the program, a turning point that would announce to the world that things were different in College Park. That ... didn't quite happen. It's a good class, not a barn-burner of a class (at least not yet). But it's an improvement over what it almost was, and still a positive sign for the future. The question now becomes whether or not the staff can build on this - and, with more Locksley and more early groundwork laid by an admittedly hard-working Edsall, I have to think they will. If they do, despite all of the negative energy around the program right now, at least one thing will be going right in Gossett Team House.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Running backs
Good points about the running backs. This may have been mentioned elsewhere on this site, but the Post reported that MD had the #2 running back class in the country. That is an outstanding achievement.
http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9&c=14&view=3&yr=2012
I know he is still kicking himself for bringing Crowton on
He was trying to be progressive, knowing the spread, as in the NFL, will eventually consume most college offenses.
One problem. Our Pro-set 2010 lineup was primed for a smash mouth running year, having some experienced OLs, 2 experienced and 1 promising Frosh RB – and we lost Torrey and some good WRs.
RE was running like crazy his last 4 years at UConn, so I figured w/ our personnel, we were gonna be ramming it down team’s throats. Well, we know what happened and the rest was history.
Guess What? Fresh Lox, top RB class, Pro-Set, Danny ready – we ARE going to run a LOT this year, and our young talented WRs are going to bring great balance for the 2013 season.
"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."
by bball purist on Feb 2, 2012 12:04 PM EST up reply actions
This is what I want to hear
Junior Defensive Back Issac Goins
On where he sees himself fitting in:
“I’m just coming here to compete for the starting spot. Nothing is a given and I have to work every day but I want to play and I’m excited for the opportunity.”
On what sold him on Maryland:
“Coach Edsall sold it for me. I loved his ambition and his drive and his goals for the future. I bought into what he was saying. I thought he was a great guy, so did my mom. Just playing under him sold it.”
by umcp96 on Feb 2, 2012 11:40 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Dancel connection established
or to quote the WWF Godfather………… “pimping ain’t easy”.
I was saving this for a fanpost, but Ben beat me to it
Since I can’t post at work, I typed it up and was saving for when I got home. But here is best as place as any (and it bothers me to see multiple posts about the same thing during the same day). On MDs football recruiting class:
http://www.umterps.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/020112aak.html
To summarize it by position ranking in the nation, we came out fairly well:
Scouts ranks us the #2 overall RB class in the nation (#21 on rivals)
Scouts ranks us the #11 overall QB class
Rivals has us at #28 overall for WR (eh, but we had 2 solid WRs come in last year too)
Rivals has us at #16 overall for LB
For Defensive Line, we didn’t get that key nose guard that we need in the 3-4, but we landed a solid DE in Braglio who was a high 3 star talent, and we have Quinton Jefferson coming in this year from last years class.
They also mention that we only picked up two offensive linemen, but the two we picked up were quality 4 star recruits. I’m back and forth on this because you can always use numbers on the offensive line, but at the same time you don’t want to take them just to take them, so I feel good about just getting a quality tackle and guard.
We added 5 defensive backs, but I’m not sure where we stand on that. Dancel is a transfer who played at Good Counsel, so even though he isn’t necessarily a “great” pickup, he did help us land Wes Brown at RB and the more Good Counsel players we pick up the better chance we have later on in recruiting with a top local HS. Sean Davis could be a diamond in the rough depending on how he transitions to bigger competition; he dominated in HS but his competition wasn’t that great.
Overall if you break the class down, we did a lot better than our overall low to mid 40s class ranking suggests. We picked up quality depth where we needed it on offense (QB and RB), and on defense as well at the LB position. We’re still in it for Diggs (however remote a chance that we have), who would be a serious pickup at the WR position. He instantly adds the playmaking ability we need.
Going into next year, we really need to land the parts we need in the secondary (I really hope Fuller!) and on the defensive line. If we can do that, while also picking up some depth on the offensive line (we’re in it for a top 25 OT out of DC), we’ll be in good shape going into the future. I’d say that the secondary and defensive lines are the priority next year, while a playmaker at WR trails closely behind (and probably moves up if we don’t land Diggs). We’re also in it for Adam Brennemen, and he’s been to MD numerous times already. Believe Abner Logan is all over him on twitter as well.
Thoughts?
Agree with wanting more linemen.
I saw in a fanpost that we did get two preferred walk on offensive linemen in Ty Tucker and Michael Dunn, though. Obviously they haven’t wowed many scouts so far, but given a few years of practicing and training in a FBS football program, who knows? Gonnella began as a walk on.
The two best incoming DB’s are Hill and Nixon; both come from programs that play top notch competition. Hill was 1st team 5A in GA a state that produces almost 200 Div 1 players every year and Nixon coming out of West PA another super competition area. And Davis and Riddle (who I think will wind up as Safety) have huge upsides as both have size and speed. As for the OL; remember we brought in 4-5 pretty good kids last year. It would have been a really good class if we could have secured the two DT’s; losing one because of baseball and the other to Bama so be it. Go to plan “B” Nate Clarke and or Zeller to DT.
Li'l props to Franklin over in Maryland West (aka Vanderbilt)
Glad to see he’s having success there. Definitely deserves it.
What's best for me right now
it to feel a little positive energy circling the football program.
Terps held their own in recruiting
especially with the likes of NC State, Dook, Wake Forest. According to the Raleigh News & Observer paper today their recruiting classes averaged from 2.5 stars to 2.8 stars. Big news is they did not as much as sniff a 4 or 5 star guy. None of those schools got any 4 star or 5 star guys. I know Stars are not everything but nice to have and those rankings provide an interesting benchmark to compare. In spite of a down year and only having Locks on board a short time Terps got some very good players in this class. I am very happy about this class. Go Terps!.
Terrible comparison man
you just said we did well against the likes of NC State, Duke and Wake Forest in football recruiting. 2 of those 3 teams are terrible football schools, thats like saying we’re only the 4th worst team in the league
Think again
The News and Observer also had UNC’s class ranked lower than ours. Last I checked, NC State, UNC and Wake all went to bowls last year. I am happy with recruting being ranked higher than those teams.
Both have good points.
We can be happy that we did better than teams that had more wins than us, but we shouldn’t be satisfied comparing ourselves with the bottom half of the conference.
I'm not saying the class sucks
I’m just saying we shouldn’t be satisfied with beating out the bottom 1/3 of the ACC in recruiting. See my post above, I’m actually quite satisfied with the needs addressed in this class. We obviously didn’t address them all but we did hit some critical areas
A 49th ranked class
Is very typical, although a tad on the low side for UMD…..We have had top 50 classes for the last 11 years and in some cases top 25.
It is up to RE to do something with them on the field…hopefully he can……If we go 10-2 or even 9-3 this year, I will happily eat crow
We have the talent to be a very competitive team this year....
I’m just focused on how the new coaching staff fairs this year. I think our new D-Coordinator will have this defense much improved from last year. I know there is a concern about the size of our D-linemen in a 3-4 system, but ask yourself, how many top-notch O-line units are we going to face this year? 2 or 3? That doesn’t bother me. We just need to tackle better as a unit. To me, that was our biggest issue last year (well for years now). By my count, there were 5 games that we should have one if we tackle better: WV, GT, Clemson, BC, and NCST. Those games would have made us bowl eligible. Bringing in good young talent and giving them a chance to compete for starting jobs will make this year’s defense hungrier.
Oh yeah, the recruits...lol
We have a pretty good class…Madaras, Bringham, Brown, Reid, and Logan have all been rated 4 stars on at least one of the major sites (ESPN, Scouts, Rivals). Plus I think we have some sleepers in this class (Amba Etta Tawo, Alvin Hill, Levern Jacobs, Isaac Goins). Like I said before, its all about coaching them up.
Gotta Love Randy
Hi ego is so big, I guess he felt a little threatened that Locks was getting credit for the recruiting class…..here he is taking Mike down a peg:
Asked how much of an impact Locksley, who replaced Gary Crowton, had on recruiting, Edsall said, “This whole recruiting is a team effort, it’s not just one guy. Mike came in and had relationships and has ties and aided us in terms of where we were in the recruiting process. We were pretty far along with a lot of these kids. His influence with a couple helped.”
Edsall gave a lot of the credit to recruiting coordinator John Dunn, who followed Crowton from LSU to Maryland.
2 scoops of Rockin Randy Please!
he isn't bashing Lox there
He stated how it was. Recruiting is a team effort, not just one person. Lox came in with relationships and ties with players, and helped them with players that they were further along in the process with. I’m not mad at that statement at all.
Yeah, thats kind of a reach for a RE criticism.
You’ve got other more legitimate beefs will Randy, just stick with those for your hater campaign.
save your man-crush for someone more deserving like Turgeon
there is a name for bosses who try to keep employees from receiving well deserved credit…..its umm….ummm….a-holes
Locks pulled his butt out of the ACC cellar with recruits and everyone knows it…..he should acknowledge it when asked
wait, so you like Locksley now?
Or was that your friend that hated him?

by 













