First Look at Maryland-Wake Forest: Terps Look for First ACC Win
Maryland didn't get the result they wanted to begin the ACC schedule, but as I've been saying a win would've been a pretty surprising outcome. That's not true for their second ACC matchup, a thankfully easier home date with the Wake Forest Demon Deacons.
Wake, as you probably know, was expected to have another rough year and likely occupy the ACC cellar, or at least thereabouts. (Boston College, obviously, was the unanimous last-place selection.) The early-season results didn't give any cause for disagreement: the Deacs' most impressive non-con victory might've been a two-point road win over Nebraska, while they dropped games to Dayton, Richmond, Seton Hall, and, shockingly, a really bad Arizona State team by 28 points. Then, in their final pre-ACC tune-up, they lost to Wofford, managing on 50 points in the process. Yes, it was without their best player, but still: Wofford. Lose-to-Wisconsin-by-36, can't-beat-UMKC, ten-points-worse-than-Western Carolina Wofford. It was basically confirmation that this Wake Forest squad would struggle to make any noise in the conference.
Of course, then everything gets turned upside down: with their roster intact for their ACC opener, they toppled a decent Virginia Tech team in Winston-Salem. Suddenly, everyone will be taking another look at the damage Wake can still do.
But VT upset notwithstanding, if there are any games Maryland should be winning in the conference, it's against still-rebuilding squads, like Wake, who have less depth than the Terrapins and a similar (or perhaps slightly inferior) talent level. And that's doubly true at home.
If Maryland has any ambitions for this season, even if only for the NIT, this is a crucially important game. It's obviously not a must-win in the truest sense of the word, but in the same way that the Terrapins' trip to Raleigh was huge for the Wolfpack, so is the Deacs' trip to College Park for the Terps.
The scary thing is that I'm guessing a lot of people were looking at this as about as close as you can get to a guarantee game in the ACC, save for the BC home game. That's clearly not the case - Wake Forest actually has a fair amount of talent, especially on the wings, and flexed their muscle with the Virginia Tech win over the weekend. Maryland is rightfully favored, but it's far from a gimme.
The area Wake Forest scares me the most is with their wing play, where junior C.J. Harris and sophomore Travis McKie - who is really playing a lot of 4 for Jeff Bzdelik but is a 3 at heart - form a potent duo. Both are averaging about 35(!) minutes per game and are putting up big points consistently: Harris averages 18.2 ppg, and McKie isn't far behind with 17.5. They're easily the highest-scoring duo in the ACC, and in fact are #2 and #3 in the conference behind only, yes, Terrell Stoglin.
But it isn't just that they put up points. McKie in particular is so well-rounded: he shoots well from just about everywhere on the floor, leads the team in rebounding at 6.5 a game, and is supposedly a top-notch defender to boot. With his size (6-8), skillset, and athleticism, he'll be a difficult handle for whoever Maryland wants to put on him.
Harris, meanwhile, is a deadly efficient scorer. He shoots 50% from three but has only 49 attempts (Stoglin has twice that), so he's careful about picking his spots - not a bad thing, of course. He's third in the conference and 33rd in the country in true shooting percentage and is similarly high in eFG%. He gets to the line more or less at will, second in the conference to only Stoglin (but remember that he takes significantly fewer shots). McKie and Harris are truly two of the hidden gems of the ACC, and in tandem they're pretty formidable. Maryland's defense will probably need to step up from what it was against N.C. State, because the two would have a field day otherwise.
The good news for Maryland is that the quality on Wake's roster more or less ends there. Sure, there's promising seven-foot sophomore Carson Desrosiers, who will give Alex Len his best test yet, and sophomore point guard Tony Chennault has a lot of potential. But neither have really impressed so far in their young career: Desrosiers is averaging only 5 rebounds per game (his offensive rebounding percentage, for example, is worse than Sean Mosley, Berend Weijs, and Mychal Parker), while Chennault's assist to turnover ratio is above 1.0 but a little worse than Pe'Shon Howard's - and I think we all agree that Pe' isn't really lighting the world on fire right now.
Rounding out the starting lineup is 6-8 senior Nikita Mescheriakov, everybody's favorite Belarusian punching bag. Mescheriakov has seen a jump in both playing time and quality this year, but 7 points and 4 rebounds (and a 28% three-point percentage) isn't really going to scare anyone.
The Deacs go only two-deep past that. There's 6-3 freshman combo guard Chase Fischer, who's been forced into big minutes (he played 37 against Wofford in relief of Harris) and has acquitted himself well. He seems a little one-dimensional, but he's a serious catch-and-shoot threat, having taken 65 threes and shooting nearly 40% on them. There's also 7-foot senior big man Ty Walker, who was suspended for the first semester or so. Walker is basically the epitome of unfulfilled expectations; a former five-star recruit, he's never been anything more than a bit piece in Winston-Salem. He's like a worse Mike Jones. That said, Wake Forest is probably the only team in the ACC who can sub in one seven-footer for another, and thus the only one without any height deficiency against Alex Len. That counts for something.
Maryland, in comparison to Wake's light lineup, can go nine-deep, which obviously should favor the Terrapins. Strangely, though, they're not a guarantee to try to slow it down; they've played seven games with 70 or more possessions (Maryland's had only four), and are actually 64th in KenPom's adjusted tempo rating. They've gotten much slower in recent games (or other teams have slowed them down?), as they hardly cracked sixty possessions against Wofford and Virginia Tech, and in fact didn't crack 60 against Seton Hall. So it looks like against more talented or deeper teams, Bz wants to slow it down - I doubt Turgeon will oblige him, and that should play in Maryland's hands some, particularly as the game winds down.
(Sidenote: I feel like this may be a bellwether game for Mychal Parker. He's probably the best pure matchup on Maryland's roster with McKie, and his athleticism and willingness to run should be perfect in a game like this. He's already more athletic than anyone on Wake's roster - imagine what it'd look like when they're tired and he's not. If Turgeon truly does trust him as much as the fanbase is starting to, I wonder how much he'll get unleashed, particularly at the end of halves.)
As a team, Wake isn't particularly bad offensively, but they're not particularly good, either. They're in the top 150 in eFG%, top 100 in turnover %, and they can get to the free throw line as well as anyone in the country. There's a bit of over-reliance on McKie and Harris, but not so much that it kills the offense. They take very few three-pointers, but that's about being smart: they shoot about 37% as a team from deep, which is one of the better marks in the conference. They won't shoot the lights out because they don't take threes unless they're good shots, but give the right guy a look and more likely than not it'll be three points.
The problem with their offense is two-fold: they over-rely on getting to the free throw line, and they don't rebound. On the first mark, they're 15th in the country in free throw point distribution, and second in the ACC - Maryland is first, but I don't think most would quantify Maryland as a consistently good offense. A full quarter of Wake's points come from the stripe, largely because they're so good getting there. A team like Maryland is one of the best in the country at not letting teams get to the line, though, and their athletic advantage should mean they don't find themselves in positions where they need to foul. Keeping Wake off the stripe would force them to rely on the other parts of their offense, and while those parts are efficient, they're a lot less efficient than 70% (which is what WF shoots from the line).
As for the offensive rebounding: Bzdelik is more of a "get back and defend" type of coach, but this also has to do with Wake's roster, which lacks an elite rebounding presence. Their offensive rebounding percentage on the year is only 26% - compared to, for instance, Maryland's 38%. It's the second-worst mark in the ACC, and if not for Boston College would've been the worst by a wide margin - about 100 spots nationally. Maryland has been one of the best defensive rebounding teams in the country since Alex Len's debut, and should make sure Wake Forest has minimal second-chance opportunities.
Defensively, Wake is probably competent but not really good. They're dead last in the ACC in eFG% and have average, middle-of-the-pack rates in TO% and defensive rebounding%. They have some enforcers on the inside with Desrosiers and Walker, but otherwise they don't seem particularly effective. They've had some low defensive point totals - an average of 55 a game over their last two - but that was as much due to the turtle-speed pace of the game as anything else.
Maryland will likely push the tempo, which should get some easy buckets, and given that they're starting to hit their stride offensively in the half-court I'm not expecting too many problems. Especially with shots starting to fall from outside more (particularly from Stoglin), the Terrapins' offense should thrive against an average-at-best Wake Forest defense.
And not that it's mind-blowing news here, but as I said before Maryland is the better rebounding team of the two. They should be able to win the boards.
It's tough to get a hold of where Wake Forest really is. McKie and Harris are elite talents, and they win over Virginia Tech is actually pretty impressive - the Hokies aren't a bad team this year. But their black-eye losses, even the one that came without Harris, are pretty damning. Maryland is equally unpredictable, with a very high ceiling evident but also a penchant for sloppy play.
All things told, Maryland is probably the superior team here, and homecourt advantage is a nice bonus for a young team. The extra depth and middling Wake Forest defense may end up being the turning point in this one.
40 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Could someone tell me what eFG% is and
How to calculate it?
by db0255 on Jan 9, 2012 5:27 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Apologies, should've done this earlier
The formula is (FG + 0.5 * 3P) / FGA. This statistic adjusts for the fact that a 3-point field goal is worth one more point than a 2-point field goal. For example, suppose Player A goes 4 for 10 with 2 threes, while Player B goes 5 for 10 with 0 threes. Each player would have 10 points from field goals, and thus would have the same effective field goal percentage (50%).
must win
Need to get ACC momentum.
by valleyterp on Jan 9, 2012 5:30 PM EST via mobile reply actions
so uh
anyone got that parker dunk for me? i was promised it to be on youtube
RIP Lennie Bias
Turgeon General, Fear the Turgeon, in Turgeon we trust.
Lesean is the "Real Slim Shady"
by dterpfan on Jan 9, 2012 5:33 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
It'll be cupcake city -
WF is truly awful, one of the awfullest teams in the ACC. MD by 20 seems about right.
Huh?
Do you think Wake is significantly worse than any team we have played this year? I mean, our biggest victory was by 12 against Samford.
You don’t get to be number 1 in luck on KenPom by blowing people out.
Just sayin’
I guess.
But saying “you don’t get to be #1 in Luck by blowing people out” is like saying “you don’t get to be #1 in Not Blowing People Out by blowing people out.” I mean, it’s true, but …
I don't think it will be that easy
still think MD will win but wake did beat a bubblish VT team. gotta take every acc game seriously
by nhlnflnba18414 on Jan 9, 2012 6:08 PM EST up reply actions
LAZY PEOPLE
come on Ben ;P
I know the game is on the 11th.. Wednesday, but what time is it and will I be able to see it? Please Comcast or an ESPN that doesnt end in 3. Arg.
It is on RayCom?
Should be on Channel 20 for Comcast in the southern MD area then. Can’t quite think of the TV Station that is, but all the Raycom broadcasts usually get picked up by them for MD games.
Who the hell is UMKC?
University of Maryland Kentucky Fried Chicken?
by db0255 on Jan 9, 2012 6:17 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Missouri Kansas City
I think their mascot is the Kangaroos. Badass.
Isn't this an obscene gesture?
Campbell University near me (NC) is the Raging Camels. I never saw an incensed camel, but I’d stay out of the way!
If I remember correctly...
We played these guys like 5 years ago and Mike Jones set a Maryland record with 9 3 pointers or something like that. I was at the game and have never seen somebody in such a zone.
by RealtorTerp on Jan 10, 2012 12:08 PM EST up reply actions
Wake
I actually attended the Wake v. Nebraska game earlier this year for the ACC/B1G challenge and can honestly say the Deacs have there moments. Maryland is by far the better team on paper but Wake does play fairly tough in stretches hence the VA Tech upset. Problem is they don’t play that way for 40 minutes. Obviously Nebraska is not a Maryland but if we play our game we should be fine. It would be awesome if there was a nice raucous crowd at Comcast on Wednesday because it would really bode well for our confidence.
by Fear the TurGle on Jan 9, 2012 6:56 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Wasn't sure where to post this...
Just read on twitter from Ballinisahabit- “RT @rogrubenydn: Per a source, former Texas A&M guard Jamal Branch agreed to accept St. John’s scholarship offer. Over AZ, UCLA, Marq, MD.”
If true, then no visit
to Terpland this weekend.
Yeah all the usual suspects are tweeting it now.
SJU was probably a better fit for him. Wouldn’t have to battle anyone for playing time.
Maybe a sign the Twins are on our horizon?
Greasy Steve Lavin probably told Branch that we have the inside track on the Harrisons. Hope we do!!
Don't perpetuate the UCLA myth
Lavin is slick, but top shelf guy. I’m sure he does what he does to get recruits, but from what I’ve read, he accentuates all the positives he has to offer and doesn’t need to knock other coaches/schools. Kinda the same way Turge and staff operate. Go in knowing all that you’re great at, and let the recruits know it.
"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."
by bball purist on Jan 10, 2012 5:26 PM EST up reply actions
WF bs VT should be a concern
I think VT lost the game more than WF won but the Terps better go into the game with an attitude or they’ll pay for it.
Yeah VPI kept shooting threes for some reason, but it was Wake's best game of the year defensively
We went into a very effective 2-3 zone and they tried to shoot their way out of it. Walker for all his faults is a very solid defender inside and in a 2-3 even if he’s not blocking shots it’s kind of tough to get shots up and over a 7 footer in the middle who is intent on swatting everything coming his way.
Blogger So Dear
"Meet me on the Quad at midnight" Skip Prosser
Start Parker
rather than Padge…get some better D on Harris and McKie and also maybe get McKie in foul trouble tryint to guard a 3 who’s a slasher…
Eh...
Then we are really going 2 guard, 2 wing, 1 F/C. Not sure if Turge is going to do that, but if they want to run then I can see them using a lot of that lineup. Trying to envision how fast a game would go with Howard at point, Stoglin, Mosley/Faust, Parker, Len in the game.
We only lost to Wofford becuase Harris wasn't playing.
Harris is a top 3 scorer in the ACC and is our best player and we still only lost by 4. Embarrassing but not really an indicator of Wake.
Blogger So Dear
"Meet me on the Quad at midnight" Skip Prosser
Looks like you took
a wrong turn off of tobacco road…“we” are the Terps.
by WherestheBison on Jan 10, 2012 5:35 PM EST up reply actions

by 















