On Maryland Football's Scholarship Numbers
We have lots to get to today news-wise, including some football staffing stuff and some basketball recruiting stuff. But let's keep the football recruiting train rolling, because this is the first time in years I've actually felt good about it.
Anyway, everybody's really excited about Wes Brown's commitment last night and the ensuing huge impact it could (and perhaps will) have on the rest of the recruiting class. (Stefon Diggs and Eddie Goldman!) I've seen a lot of people question how many more guys Maryland can take in this class, probably fantasizing over a half-a-hundred five-star locals. It's a bit of a stickier issue in football than it is in basketball, mostly because of the sheer volume of players. Anyway, common sense is likely telling you that Maryland has a ton of space in terms of scholarships right now, right? I mean after the Transfer Counter thing and all the attrition and the fact they were already three scholarships short and the middling recruiting class, it would only make sense.
So, is that the case? Well, sort of, but probably not as much as you had thought.
The N.C.A.A. allows 85 scholarships per team; Maryland was sanctioned down to 82 last season, but that's back up to the full number now. By my count, the Terrapins currently have 60 scholarship players returning from last year; that goes to 61 when you count the incoming transfer of Zach Dancel, and then all the way up to 84 when you count Maryland's 22 verbal commitments and one grey-shirt, Quinton Jefferson. If you want to see the chart, check it out here.
Now, two things: first of all, there's always significant attrition in spring ball. There were dozens of guys who would leave during the Friedgen era, and I imagine just as many if not more will bolt in the Edsall era. Right off the top of my head I can think of two players who still might transfer for Edsall-related reasons (no names, but both are from Georgia), another two or three who might have playing time qualms, and of course the loser of the QB battle in the spring might leave as well. Throw in the requisite two or three academic problems, the guys who decide they just don't want to play football anymore, and whoever doesn't qualify out of the recruiting class, and, well, that 85 number usually takes care of itself.
In fact, it was common to go into spring practice practice with 90 (or sometimes more) committed scholarships, a number which always worked its way down by the start of fall practice. If they absolutely must make room, there are options available to them. To start with, two former walk-ons, Ryan Schlothauer and Josh Cary, were both given scholarships last year. It's common practice in basketball to revoke those types of scholarships if they're needed; it's less common in football, but still possible. Schlothauer, in particular, is a fifth-year senior and should've already graduated, so I don't believe that would raise any eyebrows.
Actually, on that topic: it's also not particularly uncommon for fifth-year players to either decide they don't like football anymore or be asked to leave by the coaching staff. Most of the fifth-year seniors at Maryland are expected to be big contributors, but guys like Justin Gilbert (coming off a major leg injury), Devonte Campbell (stuck behind Furstenburg at tight end), or Schlothauer might be possibilities for that sort of thing.
I have very few worries about Maryland's ability to keep it down to 85 scholarships; they could take another 10 guys and I don't think I'd be very worried about their ability to keep it down to 85 scholarships. It's the "taking another 10 guys" that would be the problem.
See, the N.C.A.A. dictates that you can only enroll 25 freshman a year. Maryland currently has 23 with Brown's commitment last night, and they're still going hard after nearly a dozen big-time locals.
So how do they all fit in? Much like fitting in to the 85, there are a few options. The first is to do what's called "back-dating." Basically, if someone enrolls in the spring, a team can count their enrollment toward last year's class instead of the next year's class; that is, for 2011's instead of 2012's, assuming there's room. By my measure, there should be nine more spots in the 2011 class, which means there could be as many as nine early enrollees in the 2012 class that don't count against the 25 number.
Isaac Goins, the JuCo cornerback transfer, Levern Jacobs, the prep school wide receiver, and Quinton Jefferson, who grey-shirted (more on that in a second), will all enroll in the spring semester. That would give Maryland three more spots in the 2012 class, knocking that number down to 20. I wouldn't be surprised if guys like Madaras, Brigham, or Dean - all pretty smart guys who, I believe, go to privates - enrolled early, either.
The other option is grey-shirting, where some of the less-finished products take a year at a prep school and wait until the 2013 class to enroll. Joe Vellano did it, but it can be a little risky; players have been known to decommit over being asked to do it, and even if they don't that means there's another year of them being on the open market. Joe Riddle, Shawn Petty, Avery Thompson, and Malcolm Culmer could all be possibilities there, and that would open up basically as much space as the Terrapins needed.
So while Maryland isn't exactly floating in unlimited scholarship space, they're not really squeezed in that regard either. They could still take another five guys without blinking, and I wouldn't be nervous even if they went higher than that. Between the grey-shirt candidates and the more potential transfers, there's enough space to take anyone talented enough they want to take.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great news
Thanks for this, Ben. I was getting nervous that we didn’t have enough room for Diggs, Goldman, Darby, Reid, Montgomery, Kirwan. Good to know we can take all those guys.
Any news on defensive coordinator?
Redskins @RGIII - 2012
by Copious 1 on Jan 6, 2012 11:56 AM EST via Android app reply actions
Don't wanna be a hater...
but you know RE will take credit for this revamped recruiting or say this is a tribute to RE doing things the right way
by bloodwatermission on Jan 6, 2012 12:08 PM EST reply actions
Was he directly responsible for Locksley hire?
If yes, then maybe he has a right to take some credit. But if it was forced on him by KA, then he certainly has less of a claim.
Either way, my opinion of RE has returned to early season levels – skeptical, but cautiously optimistic.
by Mike S. on Jan 6, 2012 12:22 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
stuff/perceptions can change quick - In a New York Minute
if action is taken – I give RE credit for sitting with KA and getting some work done that needed to be done. KA being at West Point couldn’t have hurt him in that area.
I like Don Henley’s ol’ NY minute song for its perspective – song is just ok so I won’t subject anyone to it. It was good for 9/11 healing…
"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."
No need to hate here...
…both KA and RE deserve credit. If getting Locks was the idea of either of them, the other gets credit for being smart enough to agree with it.
NO
YOU know that. Unfortunately my crystal ball is in the shop for its 10,000 reading checkup.
by Lucky Horseshoe on Jan 6, 2012 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
Very insightful post
One thing is for sure. Finally a lot of excitement surrounding the recruiting in both football and basketball.
Yes, but can't we oversign?
I know that last summer the SEC limited the number of signees to 25, but was that rule already in place for the ACC?
Actually, it's 28 signees
But 25 enrollees. So if a couple are expected not to qualify then we can sign more.
13.9.2.3 Limitation on Number of National Letter of Intent/Offer of Financial Aid Signings—Bowl
Subdivision Football. [FBS] In bowl subdivision football, there shall be an annual limit of 28 on the number
of prospective student-athletes who may sign a National Letter of Intent or an institutional offer of financial aid
from the initial signing date of the regular signing period of the National Letter of Intent through May 31. [D]
(Adopted: 1/16/10 effective 8/1/10)
I have been a huge RE hater since day one
So by being a realist I have to give him praise when he is doing well. Their were reports of him recruiting hard this season (harder than fridge) at least. So I think we have to allow him the fortunes of praise considering all of the negative he has had to account for. Only fair!!!
by Jeffro78 on Jan 6, 2012 12:22 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
+1
I don’t want to understate the importance of Locksley, but you have to give RE for at least doing some of the work to get Brown lined up – particularly if you believe Brown was a MD guy all along, as he said.
RE has put us in position to get some other big fish, too … then Locksley showed up and knocked down the first domino. Let’s hope there’s plenty of credit to go around a month from now.
Brown was being honest
we know people inside the GC program who have said from Day 1, that Brown was never a doubt for MD, and had been predicting for months that he would verbal to MD. So a lot of credit has to be given to RE. Although i don’t think anyone has ever had a problem with RE’s recruiting. Its his “intangibles” that are the major issue for most.
by BigLevadelphia on Jan 6, 2012 12:45 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks, Ben
An interesting post. I’d have to say regardless of the numbers, if Goldman and/or Diggs want to commit, you find room for them.
Scholarships
So basically the class is done except for the really high profile guys. There are currently tons of 3 star guys to form a great base. If Edsall (or Locks) can finish with 3 more 4/5 star guys I will be very excited. With no more additions, I’d say we are about an average Friedgen class.
by TerpFan2001 on Jan 6, 2012 12:46 PM EST via mobile reply actions
The other option is grey-shirting, where some of the less-finished products take a year at a prep school and wait until the 2013 class to enroll.
You're too kind Ben
Here’s the raw version: It’s where coaches from major programs like Bama’s Saban and other deceptive pricks offer schollies, have the players accept, and then tell them before enrolling in fall that “oops, by the way, we don’t have room for you on our squad, we had too many players accept schollies, (knowing full well they are doing it). Wait until Winter semester to enroll, and then you get 6 years with 4 years of eligibility still left.”
"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."
btw, this is no slam on grey shirts in general
It’s that coaches like Saban abuse the crap out of it:
http://oversigning.com/testing/index.php/2011/02/06/alabamas-numbers/
"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."
used as a strategy to help vs. other SEC schools
“What we are seeing from some schools in the SEC is a mad scramble to wrangle in as many players as possible in order to try and keep them away from other schools, a recruiting tactic as old as the SEC itself, and the grayshirt process has turned into a safety valve for getting back down to 85 if necessary. This is what Bernie Machen was referring to as morally reprehensible and what Mark Richt was referring to when he said that schools are offering scholarships like candy.”
"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."
I am very much obliged for this.
My niece in Alabama is married to a huge PITA Bama fan and this guy always preaches what a saint Saban is to the point where I leave the room to keep peace in the fam. I am sending this link to him ‘cause I tell him all the time that Saban ain’t no saint.
You're most welcome
At the least, Saban is unethical in my book – that supports it – plus, Ala. covers their S like many major fball powers.
"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."
APR scholarship reductions
If memory serves, the scholarship reduction was based on 2009-2010 academic data, was announced sometime in Spring 2011 and would apply to the current recruiting class, limiting the incoming/total count to 22/82 scholarships, or so I thought.
Regardless, given the numerous advances in scholarship capology, as explained in this post, a one-year, 3 scholarship reduction seems unlikely to have any effect.
It was a three-scholarship reduction, IIRC
And we had the option of doing one a year for three years, or three in one year. We took three in one year, so the reduction should be over.

by 














