Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Will Never Top Michael Jordan

MD last in ACC in men's recruiting expenses


The website businessofcollegesports.com does some good work researching data in college sports and is doing a series on expenses for each major conference in regards to recruiting. First up was the ACC, where Maryland finds itself in last place in men's sports for recruiting expenses. It's an interesting table to look at. You'd think with more teams than most schools, that would lead to more raw spending, but I guess not. Take it for what its worth, I just thought it was an interesting tidbit to pass along

http://businessofcollegesports.com/2012/01/19/acc-recruiting-expenses-2/

Anything deemed inappropriate will be deleted by an admin or moderator with the power to do so. The views of the above FanPost do not represent the beliefs of Testudo Times or Testudo Times' authors, nor are they the work of them.

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

There’s really no dollar amount you can put on the job Edsall did with recruiting this season.

by Fushezzi on Jan 19, 2012 2:26 PM EST reply actions  

Au contraire

$500,000 (aka Lock’s salary)

by aMo on Jan 19, 2012 3:20 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I't's interesting but

I’m not really sure how useful this information is. The Athletic Department is saddled with debt so that could be a factor. It could reflect a more efficient use of resources. There may or may not be a correlation.

MD is near the bottom on the women’s side, too but the FH, LAX & A&T teams are ridculously successful, WBB is very successful, soccer has made dramatic improvement in the last few years and softball, tennis and to a lesser degree track & field have all been moving very much in the right direction.

by FHFAN on Jan 19, 2012 3:21 PM EST reply actions  

Accounting Data and Financial Reports

I’ve looked at data from several sources and have found it nearly impossible to make direct comparisons, because no two schools have the same standards when accounting for revenues and expenses.

One school may have an incentive to inflate a particular expense on the one hand, while holding down a different expense on the other. Expenses and revenues may be reported as department totals by one school and broken out by individual sports at another. Its fairly easy to move money between categories and sports, and I’m certain that it happens regularly.

As for recruiting expenses, that would certainly seem to include travel expenses such as airfare, hotel, per diem, etc. Do they also allocate a portion of each coach’s salary according to the time he spends on recruiting trips, or some percentage of the administrative overhead that might be attributed to recruiting efforts? Who knows.

The private schools (Miami, Duke, WFU and BC) have no public reporting requirements, so they have considerable flexibility in designing financial statements.

by lockwood11j on Jan 19, 2012 4:01 PM EST reply actions  

Not to mention...

the data is from the Gary Williams, and Ralph Friedgen eras. Who had completely different approaches to recruiting. Dare I say, they didn’t like to recruit as much as our competitors? I think this is all changing with the two new head coaches.

Children should be seen and not heard.

by CharlesDriesell on Jan 19, 2012 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

It seems a little strange to me that Duke, for example, would significantly outspend Florida State, Clemson and Va Tech, the conference football recruiting leaders year after year.

by lockwood11j on Jan 19, 2012 9:40 PM EST reply actions  

This report is an accountant's dream

Anyone can shuffle numbers around anywhere they want. I don’t believe any of these figures at all.
The private universities don’t have to report any figures at all, so I would think their numbers are purely a guess.
I do believe Gary and Ralph may not have spent as much money recruiting as other ACC schools. But this is the era of much smoother talking coaches playing politics in the 21st century. Being so close to DC, maybe this will rub off more on our coaching staff than in the past.

by Snappin Terp on Jan 19, 2012 11:12 PM EST reply actions  

Interesting

I wonder if part of the reason for lesser recruiting expenses compared to other ACC schools is related to the fact that the Terps are in the middle of a good recruiting area (MD, DC, VA, PA, NJ) so they can drive on a lot of recruiting trips, saving some airfare costs (and in some cases not needing a hotel room).

I’m not sure that’s the case, but it wouldn’t surprise me if that had something to do with it.

Assumption is the mother of all @#%-ups.
Recommended reading: Death to the BCS

by mdak06 on Jan 20, 2012 9:05 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Maryland Terrapins.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Nattybocrab_small
ACC better go down fighting (Rant)
Scheyerface2_small
Dwayne Morgan
Small
Stoglin in the NBA
M_small
Diggsmas in May?
Argh_calvin_jpg__small
Big Ten Network makes a profit of $79 million
Terps_kool-aid_small
New 2013 SG - RJ Curington
Maryland_flag_small
Russell Wilson Rule
Md_flag_small
Can We Dance With Aronhalt?
Mar5_mercator_small
Another Maryland B-ball team on "The Bubble"
Small
What does the ACC offer? -from FSU

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Share This Post


Managers

Testudotimes_small Ben Broman

Authors

Garyland_logo_small Dave Tucker

Mensbasketball-1024_small Ben Goldstein

251084_1429730463099_1227960970_31127493_2195273_n_small Pete Volk