On Maryland's Possible Oncoming Transition to the 3-4
There's a good chance that Brian Stewart, formerly the defensive coordinator for the Dallas Cowboys and Houston Cougars, will be introduced today as Maryland's replacement for Todd Bradford, although I could see it waiting until tomorrow or even longer if there are any negotiation issues. We know how miserly that Kevin Anderson can be with his contract negotiations, after all.
When Stewart is introduced, we'll get our answer to the biggest question surrounding him: will he bring his 3-4 scheme to College Park? He ran it at Dallas. He ran it at Houston, transitioning from a 4-3 in the process. He's a 3-4 lifer. Will the change be coming here, too?
It's a good question, and I'm sure the answer will largely define much of his success in College Park, one way or the other. It's proven controversial for Maryland fans, who rightfully look at the Terrapins' roster and wonder where the fit is. Stewart, of course, has two options here, and they're exactly what you think they are: he could keep with his current 3-4 scheme, or he could adapt to the 4-3 personnel already in place. If he chooses the latter option, this post is basically moot and I just wrote 2000 words for naught.
If he sticks with the 3-4, though ... well, its new to us, is it not? If you're wondering how exactly the Terrapins will transition to the new scheme, what to expect out of a 3-4 compared to a 4-3, who on the current roster does (or doesn't?) fit, or just want to know the basic differences between positional responsibilities, we've got you covered. Let's get to it, post-jump.
The Basics
The positives of the 3-4 is that it gets more athletes on the field at once and is a faster and more fluid scheme than the 4-3, making it much more difficult to predict or diagnose. 3-4's at the college level tend to emphasize athleticism and rack up sacks and turnovers in bunches.
The problem is that it can be tough to find the personnel to do it properly. Because you have one less guy at the point of attack, the front seven in the 3-4 has to be much bigger than it is in the 4-3. That's not too bad in the NFL, but in college most guys with the size to play in the 3-4 lack the technical skill of their 4-3 compatriots, and if they don't they have an absurd number of big offers. So for a team like Maryland that usually can't compete with Alabama, Florida, and the like, that can prove problematic. If they don't have the personnel to run the 3-4, the opposition will likely control the line of scrimmage, and might just run over them entirely.
Like any defense, there are different subsets and looks within the 3-4. The primary split is between one-gap (that is, each defensive lineman is responsible for one gap in the offensive line) and two-gap (that is, each defensive lineman is responsible for two gaps in the offensive line) looks. The Pittsburgh Steelers run a two-gap set, as do the New England Patriots, but it requires massive and talented defensive linemen. It's likely that Stewart will be bringing the one-gap look he ran at Dallas, and in truth it makes much more sense to do as most players are going to be a bit smaller anyway.
But I don't want to oversimplify this: as with any defense, there are going to be multiple looks within Stewart's defense. Sometimes he'll do one-gap. Sometimes it'll be two-gap. Sometimes he'll go with a traditional 4-3. And sometimes there will be a 3-3-5 or a regular nickel or dime package. The base look will be what's used the majority of the time, but expect a fair amount of variation within all that.
Stewart has historically tried to emphasize speed and aggression in his schemes, often as a way to compensate for smaller players at the point of attack. This is good and should fit the roster Maryland has in place, and might make the transition a little easier. If you're looking another in-depth at the scheme Stewart is likely to run, I'd suggest taking a look at this piece at Scardraft that breaks down the Phillips 3-4 with aplomb.
Nose Tackle
Probably the most important piece of the 3-4 puzzle, nose tackles usually are required to eat up two blockers and anchor the middle of the line against the run. Have a subpar NT, and the whole thing can fall to pieces. As such, the NT needs to be both big and strong, usually well upwards of 300 pounds. Maryland, being a one-gap system in the ACC, can probably get away with a NT around 300 or so. It helps if they have enough athleticism to frighten interior linemen, but the size is the most important thing.
This is my biggest concern for Maryland's transition: they lack anyone who could be described as a real space eater on the inside. Joe Vellano, at 285, isn't big enough; neither is Andre Monroe at 275. A.J. Francis comes the closest: he was at 315 when he came into College Park and while he's only at 295 now, he could probably bulk up to a little over 300. That's far from ideal, but it's what we have.
Francis, being a senior, needs to find a replacement immediately. One option is Darius Kilgo, who came into Maryland's program upwards of 300 but has slimmed down to 290. Another is a guy Maryland is currently recruiting hard, 2012 North Carolina defensive tackle D.J. Reader. The big fella from N.C. was 330 pounds his junior year in HS, and has only recently whittled himself down to 306. If he can get back up to 320 or so he'd be big enough to function as a NT at this level, and the ranking services really like his talent. He's an tank and would be able to compete right away with Kilgo to be the keystone of the defense.
Defensive End
I actually feel moderately confident on this mark. 3-4 ends are really like hybrid defensive tackles: they have to be effective against the rush, able to take on two blockers if needed, able to open up space for the rush 'backers behind them, and are usually anywhere between 270 and 300 pounds. The weakside end will need to be able to force the guard to help out on his side, while the strongside end is usually more of a traditional DE.
Vellano actually fits well. His size is good and he can stand up to both the run and the pass. I'm never a fan of changing positions for star players, and in fact this would probably kill his penetrative nature, but in this scheme his position is gone; he should fit on the outside just fine. Then there's Justin Anderson, who at 6-5 and 275 is the perfect size and has a great skillset for the spot. They'd be the odds-on favorites to start.
I guess this is where I should talk about Andre Monroe, who will likely be lost in the transition: he lacks the size to play in the middle, but is too short to play on the outside effectively. He'll probably get some spot duty at all three areas, but he's really not a great fit for the system.
As for recruiting, there's another huge prospect on the board in Korren Kirven, a DE/DT out of Virginia who is visiting Maryland sometime around now. His size is ideal at around 6-4 and 275, and while you could consider moving him inside, I'd rather him stay on the outside and be developed into a potentially elite 5-tech. Landing both he and Reader would be a fantastic start to building the core of this defense.
Outside Linebackers
The outside backers in the 3-4 are mostly responsible for the passing game; it's their job to either rush the passer or drop into coverage, and they don't have particularly significant rush responsibilities aside from keeping contain. They need to be athletic enough to drop into coverage as well as get to the passer, and strong enough to not be a liability in the ground game. There's actually some variance between what's expected out of the strong-side OLB and the weak-side OLB. The strong-side 'backer needs to be a bit more well-rounded, able to drop back into coverage against the tight end or stand up to running plays his way. The weak-side 'backer is usually the elite pass rusher like DeMarcus Ware or Shawne Merriman, an athletic freak who blitzes a ton and looks to rack up sacks.
I'm not quite sure who'd fill this hole for Maryland. It's almost as big a problem as the NT issue. The current linebackers don't have the athleticism or pass-rushing ability, while most of the defensive ends are too big to be dropping into coverage. I guess Isaiah Ross, who started at linebacker in College Park before moving down to DE, would be the best option, but I'm not sure I want him dropping into coverage. Then there are hyper-athletic 'tweeners like Ian Evans, Bradley Johnson, and Marcus Whitfield that aren't really proven at this level.
In recruiting, Maryland has brought in a ton of linebackers ... none of whom really fit this spot. A guy like Stefan Houston has the frame and athleticism needed, but he hardly cracks 200 pounds and will be overwhelmed at the point of attack. Other guys like Abner Logan and Brock Dean could probably be great strong-side 'backers but lack the elite instincts and athleticism of a great weak-side pass-rusher. There are two potentially elite options here in 2013, both local, in Dorian O'Daniel at Good Counsel and Jonathan Allen at Stone Bridge in northern Virginia. I'd expect Maryland to push hard for both.
Inside Linebackers
Interior 'backers in the 3-4 bear a lot of responsibilities for the running game. With the nose tackle in front of them protecting them from blockers, they need to be able to stuff the run game anywhere inside the tackles. One will usually try to protect the other from blockers, but they're pretty similar spots in terms of size and skillset. The ILBs need to be both big and quick, able to diagnose well, and sure tacklers. It's a demanding spot.
Good news is that I don't think most of the linebackers would have a huge problem adjusting. These two ILB spots are the most similar to the counterpart in the 4-3. Darin Drakeford is a great fit, and Demetrius Hartsfield shouldn't have any problems either. Alex Twine and Lorne Goree will both need to add bulk, Twine especially, but otherwise shouldn't have a huge problem.
As for the incoming guys, Dallas Griffiths should thrive. His size and diagnosing ability are both stand-outs for him, and will be well utilized in this scheme. Logan and Dean could work here, though they need to bulk up, but then again that's true of most college freshmen. I don't think any should be able to start right away, but they have lots of potential.
Utilized at Maryland
To finish things up, let's look at a potential lineup for the Terrapins:
SDE: Justin Anderson (Jr. / 6-5 / 275) - Anderson is a prototypical strong-side defensive end in this set. He's big enough to hold his own against the rush but also able to be penetrative if need be. He should fit into the role without much of a hitch. Primary backup: Keith Bowers (So. / 6-2 / 260)
NT: A.J. Francis (Sr. / 6-4 / 295) - He'll need to add weight, but Francis is the closest thing to a space-eater Maryland has. This is a physically demanding position, but Francis is by all accounts a hard worker and will relish the challenge. Primary backup: Darius Kilgo (So. / 6-3 / 290) Name for the future: D.J. Reader (Uncommitted '12 / 6-3 / 306)
WDE: Joe Vellano (Sr. / 6-2 / 285) - The weak-side end spot is more like a traditional DT, so Vellano will likely be a better fit here. He needs to eat up blockers and be disruptive in both the run and the pass, enough to draw an extra man and let the weak-side 'backers behind him roam free. Vellano should do well in this area. Primary backup: Andre Monroe (So. / 6-0 / 275) Name for the future: Korren Kirven (Uncommitted '12 / 6-4 / 275)
SOLB: Marcus Whitfield (Jr. / 6-3 / 230) - Whitfield could end up switching spots with Isaiah Ross at WOLB, as it's a bit tough to assess this: the SOLB is supposed to be able to drop back and cover the tight end, and I have much more faith in someone like Whitfield doing that than I do the bulkier Ross. This neutralizes Whitfield's pass-rushing ability, but it's the safer move. Primary backup: Bradley Johnson (Jr. / 6-1 / 220) Other names to consider: Darin Drakeford (Sr. / 6-0 / 240), Lorne Goree (So. / 6-1 / 230) Name for the futures: Abner Logan (Committed '12 / 6-1 / 212), Dorian O'Daniel (Uncommitted '13 / 6-1 / 205)
SILB: Darin Drakeford (Sr. / 6-0 / 240) - Drake has really good size for the spot and his primary job will be (in the run game) taking on blockers to free up the other inside linebacker and (in the pass) covering the middle of the field or rushing the passer. Should do just fine. Primary backup: Lorne Goree (So. / 6-1 / 230) Names for the future: Brock Dean (Committed '12 / 6-1 / 220), Abner Logan (Committed '12 / 6-1 / 212)
WILB: Demetrius Hartsfield (Sr. / 6-2 / 235) - This spot (MIKE) is the most similar to its equivalent in the 4-3. He's basically supposed to be the tackling machine, which is the same role Hartsfield filled last year when he was on the team. He'll rarely blitz and has more responsibilities in the run game, diagnosing and avoiding blockers. Primary backup: Alex Twine (So. / 6-0 / 220) Name for the future: Dallas Griffiths (6-2 / 225)
WOLB: Isaiah Ross (Jr. / 6-1 / 245) - This is supposed to be the elite pass-rusher of the bunch, but unfortunately if Ross doesn't end up here then he'll have to cover a tight end in the passing game ... and I don't want that to happen. Ross is an athletic pass-rusher, mind you, and isn't a terrible fit for the spot, though he's probably not the athletic monster someone like Whitfield or Johnson has the potential to be. Primary backup: Clarence Murphy (So. / 6-2 / 240) Names for the future: Roman Braglio (Committed '12 / 6-3 / 235), Jonathan Allen (Uncommitted '13 / 6-2 / 220)
The secondary should more or less stay the same, with one drastic difference: guys like Mario Rowson, Desmond Kearse, Avery Graham, and, yes, Kenny Tate should be making their way back. These smaller guys really don't have a role with the larger bodies required in a 3-4 set. The only two I could see sticking are Kearse, who's an incredible pass-rusher and could fill in at WOLB in an obvious passing down, and, unfortunately, Tate, who could be tried out at either outside 'backer spot. I don't think it'll happen, mind you, but it could.
Wrapping It Up
Assuming Stewart takes the right approach here, going one-gap and emphasizing speed and athleticism, I can see it working. But make no mistake: going 3-4 this year would be a move made entirely with eyes on the long-term. It's not the best fit for the current roster, or even a particularly good fit, although there are some pieces in reserve that will make sense in a year or two. The good news is that there are multiple recruits in the area, considering Maryland, that make tons of sense for this scheme. Get them in, and you can see the obviously huge ceiling this set has.
It'll be interesting to see how much Stewart tries to force right now, as opposed to taking some elements more slowly and waiting until they fit Maryland's personnel. If he doesn't, he might just be Gary Crowton on the other side of the ball, and we all know how that worked out. I have to say, though, I'm really intrigued to see how this looks. Now I'll almost be disappointed if he stays with the 4-3. Almost.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well done, Ben. Really glad our group of ACC bloggers is so good.
by Bud Elliott on Jan 17, 2012 8:32 AM EST reply actions 3 recs
That's high praise coming from Bud.
His FSU site is what I’d love to see TT become, and I think we are on our way. The traffic they get on just an ordinary recruiting fanpost thread is ridiculous.
Also, Ben how the hell do you have a full time job AND put out such quality articles like this?? As always, total props for your dedication.
by 1 proud terp on Jan 17, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
Do you feel Stewart will take recruit size over athleticism when it comes to the linebackers?
I say that primarily because 230-240 range isn’t really ideal for a 3-4. If Stewart can’t have both (size and ability), do you see him taking lightweight high school DE’s and making them OLB’s?
"I wish you loved me as much as you love TomahawkNation!"
""--;;--ⒻⓁⓄⓇⒾⒹⒶ-ⓈⓉⒶⓉⒺ--;;-->
by freshcollegeboy on Jan 17, 2012 8:53 AM EST reply actions
Not necessarily
Stewart chatters a lot about aggression and athleticism. If he has his choice I think he’ll opt for the more athletic guy and try to add a little weight, then the other way around.
by Ben Broman on Jan 17, 2012 10:01 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Miserly?
If by “miserly,” you mean “giving fantastic, guaranteed deals to horrible and unproven coaches who don’t fit in” I could go along with it I guess.
(kidding)
We've come a long way
Now KA = college version of Dan Snyder
With results, it’s worth it…
"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."
by bball purist on Jan 17, 2012 3:04 PM EST up reply actions
Definately a great post
IMO, the transition into the 3-4 with this personnel can be achieved faster than we may think. One of the main problems we had last year was that our Dline was too small. Switching to a 3-4 actually makes us bigger up front. Excluding the NT position, JV is an NFL sized 3-4 DE instead of a 20 pound under weight DT. Another guy this really helps is Keith Bowers, because of his size and strength this should be a perfect fit. Even at the NT position it might be good. AJ is still undersized but like Ben said, Stewart is a one gap guy. So while he’s not quite the size, he’s big and quick enough to control the gap. The biggest concern, as with new defensive scheme, is being disciplined and learning the system. Otherwise, this is a nice hire and should at least prove interesting.
I dont remember how big he is, but Bowers seems like he'd be a Ware/Orakpo kind of guy in the 3-4
I may be thinking of someone else, well i could easily be thinking of someone else.
by Maryland1206 on Jan 17, 2012 11:41 AM EST up reply actions
Don't be surprised if Pete White switches to defense
There’s no inside info, just speculation. I know he started a few games last year at OG, but I don’t think he’s ever been a revelation there and he seems to have trouble with his weight. What better way to utilize the biggest guy on your team than to move him to NT. He played DT in high school so it’s not as if it would be all that new to him. The only thing I think that could hold it up is if Locksley thinks that his powerful frame would fit his offense better than our offenses of the past. But even with that, I’d be surprised if Nate Clark didn’t take his spot.
I also think that this defense will have a heavy freshman impact next season again. It’s easier to teach a new dog new tricks rather than teach an old dog a different scheme for the third year in a row. Guys like Logan, Braglio, Houston, and possibly even Sean Davis could see a lot of PT next year in my opinion. Not to mention if we are able to wrap it up with guys you mentioned like Reader.
Other than that, I love this post Ben. Some of your best work since I’ve been reading this site, and that’s saying a mouthful.
by FeartheTurtle2002 on Jan 17, 2012 9:18 AM EST reply actions
As for our starting safeties next year
I’d be pretty surprised if it wasn’t Tate at strong and Hendy at free. That combo just seems to work for me in my head with Franklin as the backup.
by FeartheTurtle2002 on Jan 17, 2012 9:22 AM EST up reply actions
Tate at strong?
He can play it, no question, but his ball skills would be better at the Free Safety spot. His great hands from being a WR, and his previous experience as a WR, help in diagnosing the passing plays better. I guess it is a good problem to have when you have a safety that can probably be close to elite at either spot.
Tate is definitely a strong safety IMO
He reminds me a ton of Kam Chancellor. The size, physicality, plays great in the box and in run support, is decent/pretty good in coverage. Especially when you have a guy like Hendy who, while raw, has exceptional talent and play making ability to take over at free.
by FeartheTurtle2002 on Jan 17, 2012 9:44 AM EST up reply actions
Don't forget Matt Robinson
I think the kid from Atholton was leading the ACC in tackles when he got hurt. I was surprised he got a medical redshirt year based on how much of the season he had played, but he should be healthy and able to contribute next year as well.
by longerthanu on Jan 17, 2012 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
Wow
Probably the best piece I’ve read that you’ve written. Very good work and very insightful.
by Jimmy Bare on Jan 17, 2012 9:32 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Braglio
Ben, we’ve went back and forth agreeing on Braglio in other threads on what he would do in a 3-4. I’m sort of in the middle as to whether he would play the WOLB or DE. Depending on whose official size you want to believe (rivals 260, ESPN 235), he would need to definitely Redshirt and possibly take another year to bulk up to play the WDE position, but I’d argue he probably has a brighter future staying as a DE than trying to stand up. I guess it is a good thing though, right now he is in position to either stay at the weight he is at and bulk up/get quicker while learning the WOLB in a 3-4, or he can just bulk up period and play DE.
But then again, you always see success stories of DE’s in college standing up in the NFL in a 3-4 and playing at elite levels (Orakpo, Kerrigan come to mind).
Its really tough to try to pin down Braglio's spot
He’s probably a better fit at SDE with his skillset – he’s not overly quick and actually is a lot stronger than his size, but if the 235 number is right, he’d have to add legitimately 30 or 40 pounds. That’s expecting a lot. The reason I ultimately projected him at WILL instead is because even though I don’t think he’s all that athletic, he did have something like 25 sacks his junior year. Guys like Kerrigan aren’t crazy athletic but are just natural pass rushers, and that might be an area Braglio fits into.
Like you say, though, he could go either way right now, and that’s a good thing. Especially given that he doesn’t need to contribute right away and will have a season or two to get to used to the position.
by Ben Broman on Jan 17, 2012 10:08 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Makes sense
if he is a sack machine like that then I don’t have a problem with him at the WILL, since that is more of a pass rushing DE that only stands up when necessary position anyways. Works for me, didn’t know about his junior year stats
Why worry about Monroe's size, and by size I mean height
He seems like a player that will make plays wherever you put him. He’ll be fine at a DE spot, granted too small for the NT, but I wouldnt worry about height. This is still college, not the NFL combine.
What about Twine at the SOLB?- he seems to have the speed that would allow him to be better in pass coverage?
Monroe's height
In a 4-3 system, you are almost in a 1vs1 situation with the offensive line (except one person being double teamed), so size doesn’t matter as much. Guys like Mathis in Indy are undersized as a 4-3 end but there overall quickness makes them great speed rushers and overshadow there liability in the run game. In a 3-4 system, you are all but guaranteed to be double teamed on each play as a down lineman and therefore you need to be big enough to clog the gaps. Although Stewart turns a one gap system, you still need to occupy two offensive lineman, which is harder to do when you are 5’11 – 6’0 as opposed to 6’4 – 6’5 with considerably more weight.
Where does Quinton Jefferson fit in?
Maybe it would depend on his weight after his “medical issue,” but he’s pretty athletic, right?
I think
that one of the key points in this article is that there are likely to be multiple looks within this defense (which seems to be the same sort of deference being given to Locksley on the offensive side of the ball). Like most coordinators, I suspect that Stewart will try to do what works with the personnel that he has on the roster. If he thinks that the lineman are not going to cut it with a 3-4, then he may use more 4-3 base looks. It just depends. I’m not sure I would say that MD ran a true base 4-3 defense over the last few years. Don Brown and Bradford seemed to employ more “hybrid” 4-3 defensive schemes. Besides what appears to be a lack of size on the line, MD’s defensive roster may actually be more suited for a 3-4 scheme or something closer to a 3-4 scheme.
I thought the article below was interesting. It sounds like Sumlin became a convert — in part — because of a lack of depth/talent on the defensive line. It also makes sense given the number of teams out there that are running spread offenses or components of those offenses.
here the official news release about stewart
by terp11 on Jan 17, 2012 11:04 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
from Maryland Football's facebook page:
Coach Edsall: “I’m really looking forward to having Brian as part of our staff to come in and instill his aggressive 3-4 system that we are going to be using. Brian has a wealth of experience coaching the secondary and coordinating at the college level as well as the pro level.”
Coach Stewart: “I can’t say enough about being excited about coming to Maryland. I’m just excited about implementing the 3-4 and I think there are some kids that really fit these spots and I’m just excited to get on campus and get this start.”
My Take: Blackney played the 3-4 - *LONG*
Awesome post! Ben is correct with his breakdown of the 3-4 and is really helpful to see how out team will fit into this scheme. Thanks. I just wanted to dig a little deeper into the 3-4 and how it works, and why not every team can run it successfully.
This isn’t the first time we have seen the 3-4. Blackney played it but he had the rush OLB called the LEO when I was there. The hardest part about the defense is size on the DL. But you can get past the lack of size by forcing double teams through gap penetration and stunting LBs and cross face gap control. It’s not easy to do, but an athletic DL who hustle every play can do it, and do it well. The DL is not trying to get sacks in the 3-4. They aren’t even trying to get tackles! They are trying to disrupt blockers and keep the line of scrimmage from moving to the LBs. Their job is to force plays one way or another. They have to take a knee on double teams to blow up plays and be able to recognize double teams vs zone help. VERY DIFFICULT TO DO as it takes repetitions, intelligence, and trust in the rest of their teammates.
The DE/LEO/WOLB position is crucial to the success of a 3-4 team. They are usually going to be single teamed and chipped by a weakside TE or RB but they have to be aware for draw plays, screens, reverses more than anyone else on the team. On top of this, they have to get pressure on the QB when it’s a pass! They can’t simply get upfield every play, or else they will get exposed quickly and create huge gaps in the DL. They simply can’t take an inside rush to the QB, because if the QB or RB gets outside of them, They may have all day to throw or run. Same for reverses and draws and screens. RBs will slip through or past them and know that they have no help behind them. If you remember, Merriman knocked down a lot of passes. This was his defense to this strategy. Some DEs, turn and pursue the play. if they are quick enough, they can do that too. They are truly two gap players, but their gaps go from sideline to OG at times. Recruiting this position is hard because you need to get an athletic, big strong, DE, who you can teach to play the flat area. They have to be smart and be able to recognize the play quickly. Merriman fit this role well, but he also had his struggles with recognition early on. Jamal Cochran made up for his size in intelligence and recognition of the play.
When recruiting LBs in the 3-4, size is a concern, but if you have guys who are willing to take on blocks in the hole (especially the Will) and blow up OGs and FBs at the LOS, then size won’t necessarily be a big hindrance. The Mike will get a ton of tackles in a good 3-4 defense. In a true 3-4, the ends, Sam and Will have to be able to cover space well because the cover 2 is going to be your best friend. this means, that they have to cover out to the side lines in some cases. Some teams get away from this by playing the 3-3-5 or Rover defense. That way you technically have your most athletic LB playing in open space every play. This could be Tate’s ideal position.
With the ILBs, Ben is correct in saying that they play run first and pass second. On top of being sure tacklers, they are usually the first line of attack for the run. If a tackle is missed, it’s off to the secondary. This means that pursuit of the ball is crucial for everyone. Pursuit angles save TDs and secondary and LBs have to attack the play to save 1st downs.
Our corners will have a lot of help inside now in a 3-4 with two ILBs shooting to the hook/curl, and safeties helping on the inside. Safeties will have a ton of tackles and our SS may be 3rd or 4th on the team at times. They have to cover a lot of TEs though. I see our secondary being our strongest part of our team because of the size and speed we have there. Corners simply need speed and recognition. Outside runs in a 3-4 are mostly the responsibility of the alley player and the corners. This usually comes down to the Corner having to recognize run quickly and get into the backfield. This is why the cover 2 defense is usually the defense of choice for 3-4 teams. The corner can watch the backfield for run/pass.
The hidden benefit of running a successful 3-4 is a cutdown on injuries. A negative, is defending the cut block. If you have big slow players, and they get cut, there is a lot of space that they no longer can defend. Teams like GT could have field days against 3-4 teams because the reads are extremely easy and a good cut block or two, could mean a TD. Jailbreak screens are also a big gainer against 3-4 teams because of the need to pursue the ball and the LBs playing the flat in cover. If you pursue one way, and a guy sprints directly behind the pursuit, there’s no catching him. The corner or strong side flat player HAS to make that play almost every time in the backfield.
I like the change personally, and I think we can make it work with our current personnel. The athleticism is there to make up for a lot of flaws in size. I think the youth will hurt us in that the players will want to react rather than recognizing. Teach that and we could be great!
Sorry for typos!
by GBabyBFlippin on Jan 17, 2012 12:12 PM EST reply actions 6 recs
ummm, Ben get some of your life back
and hire this guy!
+1
by 1 proud terp on Jan 17, 2012 12:23 PM EST up reply actions
What do they say when a fan catches a foul ball?
“Give that man a contract!”
"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."
by bball purist on Jan 17, 2012 3:10 PM EST up reply actions
Well,from a few posts above
it looks like Stewart plans to push headlong into the 3-4. So it’ll be interesting, Ben to see how this plays out personnel-wise.
Interesting take
A defensive coordinator who understands how to contain the spread. It sounds like that is one of the reasons that MD went after him and it makes sense. I think there are a number of ways to stop a pro style offense (whether it be west coast, don coryell, zone schemed, etc), but the spread has stumped a few people because of its simplicity and reliance on pure athleticism. So, perhaps, one of the ways to combat it is to get your best athletes on the field and to attack it — and other offenses.
Posted at 12:11 PM ET, 01/17/2012
Brian Stewart plans to install aggressive 3-4 scheme as Maryland’s defensive coordinator
By Eric Prisbell
Brian Stewart, who was introduced as Maryland’s new defensive coordinator and defensive backs coach Tuesday, plans to install an aggressive 3-4 defense to combat the up-tempo spread offenses that continue to proliferate the college football landscape.
"We’re a pressure defense, a defense that is disciplined, we’re smart and we’re fast," Stewart said in a teleconference Tuesday. "All those things should help us attack the quarterback, get tackles for loss, attack the ball in the air. Keep on attacking the offense. Nowadays, with the spread offense, offenses are really taking it to the defenses, just keep on tempo-ing you, so you have to get tackles for loss and takeaways to balance that off." Stewart said that the past two seasons have been instructive because he faced an increasing number of capable spread offenses throughout Conference USA as defensive coordinator at the University of Houston.
Another interesting take
In the Wapo article, Edsall notes that the defense will resemble the Houston Texans’ version of the 3-4 rather than the Ravens’ version.
It sounds like the lack of size for a traditional nose is something that they are keenly aware of and have taken into account. Houston’s nose tackle actually explained the distinction pretty well . . .
When the Houston Texans hired Wade Phillips as defensive coordinator and announced that they would go to the 3-4 alignment, it was widely presumed that finding a wide-bodied, 350-pound nose tackle would become a priority.
The 3-4 defense usually includes a huge presence in the middle of the defensive line to occupy blockers. Shaun Rogers (Saints), BJ Raji (Packers) and Casey Hampton (Steelers) rank among the premier 3-4 nose tackles in the NFL, and exceed 320 pounds.
Yet Phillips and the Texans surprised many by pronouncing that the duo of Shaun Cody (6-foot-4, 304 pounds) and Earl Mitchell (6-3, 291) would be sufficient to play the nose in Phillips’ scheme. In the preseason, Cody has been working with the first-team defense, and the Texans are not searching for that behemoth nose tackle.
“We don’t play a true 3-4,” Cody said. “It’s more of an under-front, so I’m in the gap and line up on the edge of a guy, not totally on top of him. That suits my skills since I’m not 350 pounds.”
In the under-front scheme the Texans employ, the nose tackle lines up shading the center, as opposed to directly on the center. This technique minimizes the necessity for a huge body in the middle.
http://www.foxsportshouston.com/pages/landing_texans?blockID=553316&tagID=11354
Under fronts
Great against the power. Guards can’t pull, and speedy guys like Vellano can run down the play from the back side if they do. GREAT against zone and stretch running teams. No two way plays for the DL. LBs can FLY to the ball in a set up like this. Look at what Cushing is doing in Houston.
It’s almost like playing a 4-3 if they play an Under-front. SOLB will then be in a 5 technique with the SAM over the TE or in a 9. ILBs have to cover two gaps. Strongside B and weakside A. Any runs to the weak side are a waste of time, and strong side runs are blown up by LBs! succeptible to zone dives and cutbacks…but so is every defense for the most part
I love it.
by GBabyBFlippin on Jan 17, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
good read
Myself, Ben and others have been trying to explain to others in different posts that MD will most likely be running a one-gap 3-4 as opposed to a two-gap 3-4 that teams such as the Ravens, Steelers, Patriots and Alabama run. You need huge lineman to run the two-gap, and generally lineman of that size are going to be recruited to…Alabama.
I like the 3-4 personally, but everyone will have to realize that like it is in basketball with Turge, it is going to take at least a year to install the scheme that he wants to run and get the right players for it.
I didn't read any of the comments, so I'm not sure if this was mentioned
First and foremost, good article. The only thing I would add is that there are two types of ILBs in a good 3-4. I call them the Mack (WILB) and the Buck (SILB), but I’ve heard them go under other names too. Since most running games have a lead blocker or a TE, there are usually as many offensive players as defenders. The buck is a banger. He needs to be stronger and more physical. He has to take out the lead blocker. The Mack is faster and more athletic and acts as a “seek and destroy” guy.
There’s a great article on Dom Capers 3-4 that illustrates that point: http://waldo56.wordpress.com/2009/08/21/a-hat-on-a-hat-plus-one/
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
This is true, though the SAM (or, as you say, mack) is also expected to drop into coverage more as well
As they’re usually lined up against the tight end. Have to be a bit more well-rounded. Otherwise someone like Ross would be a great fit there.
by Ben Broman on Jan 17, 2012 1:28 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Yes, I was speaking mostly toward the run defense. The Steelers often drop either guy or sometimes a DE based on the zone blitz, but I doubt we do anything like that.
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
by John Stephens on Jan 17, 2012 1:34 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks for the write up Ben
I know nothing about the X’s and O’s or schemes of football. You took a topic that I will just usually gloss over and made it accessible and easy to understand. Now I know what to look for in replays! Thank you.
Alex Twine. Seems to me that he needs to be on the field a whole lot.
The kid just makes plays and as he gets older, stronger and quicker he will just continue to get better. Not sure exactly where in the 3-4 he fits, maybe as a backup/occasional starter at Safety or OLB, but hopefully our new DC will get him in the mix substantially.
Why Not?
Why not go to a3-4 and take advantage of the talent on the team; more at LB than DL.
Secondly, why not change to a 3-4’ God knows that the 4-3 this year was a freakin’ disaster.
Wow, Ben. What a writeup!
I’m very impressed with all the knowledge which enters TT. Thank you all for this fantastic info.
One thing that determines a successful new coach is the way he blends his defensive stratey with the talent he has on the roster. Bradford and Crowton obviously didn’t know how to do this. Hopefully Stewart is smarter and will adapt his system to the available talent.
I also hope that Locksley and Stewart become the Pied Pipers of the recruiting trails and draw in some top talent for the Terp faithful.

by 


















