Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Miami Implicated in Illegal Benefits Scandal, Football Team (Probably) Goes Boom

Ouch.

Well, I'm thinking that the Miami game on Labor Day might've just gotten a little easier. Yahoo! Sports' went public with an article earlier today detailing the absurd illegal benefits received by some Miami football players over the past decade or so, and it's pretty massive:

In 100 hours of jailhouse interviews during Yahoo! Sports' 11-month investigation, Hurricanes booster Nevin Shapiro described a sustained, eight-year run of rampant NCAA rule-breaking, some of it with the knowledge or direct participation of at least seven coaches from the Miami football and basketball programs. At a cost that Shapiro estimates in the millions of dollars, he said his benefits to athletes included but were not limited to cash, prostitutes, entertainment in his multimillion-dollar homes and yacht, paid trips to high-end restaurants and nightclubs, jewelry, bounties for on-field play (including bounties for injuring opposing players), travel and, on one occasion, an abortion.

As far as specifics go, emphasis mine:

Ultimately, what documents show is a booster who broke NCAA rules while simultaneously making tens of thousands of dollars in annual contributions to Miami's athletic program. All while incurring massive bills aligning himself socially with a stable of Miami players. A stable that features multiple elite players such as Wilfork, Beason, Andre Johnson, Devin Hester, Kellen Winslow Jr., Antrel Rolle and many more - including at least 12 players currently on the Hurricanes roster.

Frank Haith is accused, too. Seriously, read it all.

Star-divide

While this obviously means Miami's athletic department will be blown to smithereens in due time, I'm more immediately concerned about how this changes the Maryland-Miami opener on September 5. Yahoo has graciously provided a central hub to view all the implicated players (and what they did). The list of current Canes: starting safety Ray-Ray Armstrong, starting WR Travis Benjamin, starting DT Marcus Forston, start CB JoJo Nicholas, starting DE Olivier Vernon, starting DE Adewale Ojomo, starting LB (and 2010 Miami MVP, and personal Testudo favorite) Sean Spence, starting safety Vaughn Telemaque, talented-but-enigmatic WR Aldarius Johnson, DL-turned-TE Dyron Dye, backup linebacker Marcus Robinson, and maybe-starter-maybe-not QB Jacory Harris.

Phew.

That's seven starters on defense and one and a half on offense, though Johnson and Dye have too much talent to be considered anything other than important reserves. Included are arguably the the three or four most important defensive players for the Canes, and the most dynamic offensive player.

The real question will be: how many of these guys are gonna be out by September 5? The NCAA is a notoriously slow-footed organization, but they worked fast enough to make sure UNC lost most of their players last year. They've been going with the investigation for over a year now, but I expect this story will move making a judgment on it to the top of the list. Vegas, for the record, seems uncertain about the matter: Caesar's has already pulled the game off the lines, and others are expected to follow shortly

And, of course, this is all on top of the heavy suspensions already placed on the team: starting OT Seantrel Henderson, starting LB Kelvin Cain, redshirt freshman CB Keion Payne, and the aforementioned Dye are all slated to miss the opener already, along with redshirt freshman OL Jermaine Barton. Oh, and electric RB Storm Johnson, redshirt freshman CB Devont'a Davis, and redshirt freshman LB Travis Williams are all transferring, stemming from the suspensions doled out to them as well.

Assuming the NCAA suspended everyone listed above by the Maryland game - by no means a given, but I'd say a strong possibility - Al Golden will be fielding a team without nine assumed defensive starters and a whopping nineteen total players, most of them on the defensive side of the ball. The best players on the team - Spence, Armstrong, Benjamin, Telemaque, Forston, Henderson - will all be out of commission. Both the secondary and the DL will be playing with only one of their assumed starters - music to Danny O'Brien's ears, I'm sure. Miami will be playing, frankly, with the shell of a team.

The question will be if they indeed all that happens Sept. 5, and if it happens in time for the NCAA to "consider" Miami's appeal. (Remember Ohio State with Pryor et al. in the Sugar Bowl?)

Maryland might've had a rough spring with defections, but it definitely wasn't that bad. A relatively full-bodied Maryland squad playing at home should be able to deal with a rather scattered Miami team - not that it's that simple, but I'd at least expect the Terps to become the favorites. Keep in mind that a battered UNC squad gave an LSU team much better than them a run for their money in a similar situation.

NB: Yes, I feel mighty bad for Al Golden and Jim Larranaga, two apparent class acts in the coaching world now apparently stuck in a horrible position. Any chance for a Golden-Edsall trade?

Comment 78 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Possible downside for Maryland

If those players are suspended and if we beat them, instead of getting cred we deserve, we’d probably hear “they only won because miami was in shambles”. Which, might be true… but if nothing else, this could take away the opportunity for us to start the season with a bang and placement on the NCAAF map.

by T Free on Aug 16, 2011 11:06 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I take that risk

I almost always take a less impressive win over a greater possibility of a loss in a conference game that has to be played anyway.

by Ben Broman on Aug 16, 2011 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Holy smokes!!

Time to boot the dirty canes out of the ACC.

by 1 proud terp on Aug 16, 2011 11:13 PM EDT reply actions  

If we win.

it isnt as big of a deal but it would still be a good win for us. If we lose well that would suck. But i think a win is needed for us to carry momentum and excitement into the WVU game which i REALLY want to win because of those Asshole WVU fans

by Maryland1206 on Aug 16, 2011 11:24 PM EDT reply actions  

No.

Forgot to mention that.

by Ben Broman on Aug 16, 2011 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait

why not? I thought that earlier reports indicated that Shannon wanted nothing to do with the guy? If thats the case, then why wouldn’t we want to bring him on here? Maryland fans aren’t sleazy, so if Shannon comes to Maryland, there’d be virtually no chance of that happening. Imagine, with Edsall and Shannon, we’d have the most law abiding tandem of coaching imaginable.

Come to think of it, it might be too serious of a coaching staff. We should probably hire someone with a crazy personalty to offset their hard-nosed approach. Preferably someone with a JD just in case we ever need representation in court for the new coach’s crazy actions. Also the new offensive coordinator should like pirates because we all know that pirates are entrenched in Maryland’s history, and we should try and go back to our roots. But where in the world would we find such a coach???

by testudo13 on Aug 17, 2011 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Poor Coach L

his NYC instincts couldn’t help him here – Shalala in photo collecting big donation – NO CLUE!!!

"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."

by bball purist on Aug 16, 2011 11:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Suspensions??...please. Its the NCAA

they’ll probably lose 2 scholarships and only be able to practice 17hrs/wk instead of 20. That decision will be handed out Oct 2012

by Asnis71 on Aug 16, 2011 11:42 PM EDT reply actions  

wayyyy worse than it was with us

"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."

by bball purist on Aug 16, 2011 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, its both, but

we’re still waiting to see what happens with Ohio St. granted the NCAA isnt completely finished with them, but to date, it looks like a slap on the wrist. In the case of OSU, their is direct evidence the coach knew what was going on and didnt do anything; yet the NCAA is letting them off of the “lack of institutional control” allegation that will get a program hammered. I just see in this case involving the U that everyone administratively will be able to put their hands up in the air and claim they didnt know what was going on

by Asnis71 on Aug 17, 2011 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

The weird part is that, past Shalala, none of the current admin had anything to do with it

Basketball coach is gone. Football coach is gone. AD is gone. AD staff is gone. Everyone who knew about it – gone. So how does the NCAA deal with that? You have to suspend the players, of course, but maybe the school itself gets off lighter because of that. So I do understand where you’re coming from with the idea that they’ll probably get off easy, because they might.

by Ben Broman on Aug 17, 2011 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

The NCAA needs to make a statement

and deal with it by dealing with the people regardless of where they are now. Punish Heath, punish the AD wherever they are. Theyve always gone after the schools and left the new coaches and admin in the dump. Put a Bruce Pearl or Jim Tressel out of commission for 5 yrs.

by Asnis71 on Aug 17, 2011 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is a monster scandal, one of epic proportions.

I’m surprised, shocked though? No. Pretty sure their football program is about to go into rebuilding mode for the next decade or so.

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Aug 17, 2011 12:11 AM EDT reply actions  

If NCAA can prove, say, 70% of it

I’d think about the death penalty. Thing is, the entire administration has changed (AD, HC) so I’m not sure how/if they consider that. If they don’t … I mean, this is SMU proportions, no?

by Ben Broman on Aug 17, 2011 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Aug 17, 2011 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not talking about THE Death Penalty*

but if they prove a lot of the accusations and they rack up enough penalties it will still set their program back for a good 5-7 years.

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Aug 17, 2011 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

I believe a program has to be already on high probation

for the death penalty to even be on the table.

Is Jerry Angelo fired yet?

by ES46NE10 on Aug 17, 2011 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

After the SMU case

The NCAA ruled to never use the Death penalty again.. EVER.. So there won’t be a death penalty in this case. But there should be suspensions and lose of scholarships and bowl games.

by Timothy Bowen on Aug 17, 2011 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

And less than 8 years later...

they basically gave it to UMd basketball with schollys taken and a ban on TV appearances, which led to us being ineligible for the ACCT or the NCAAT. Thank God we had Gary to lead us out of the wilderness. And what did your kids do? Sell some ACCT tix and a coach drove Rudy Archer to class when he was ineligible. I still get pissed about what UMd had to endure for much less serious infractions than what we’ve seen in the past 10 years in football.

Yet Miami will get a slap on the wrist, just like THE Ohio State University and USC did. I’ll believe the NCAA is serious when they start banning teams from TV again.

"Complacency is your demise." - Kerry King

by duck on Aug 17, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

the Death Penalty

can be applied, i believe, only in cases where the offending institution and team are already on probation, regardless of the severity or number of new violations.

by lockwood11j on Aug 17, 2011 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Confirmed

NCAA bylaw 19.5.2.3.2, the “death penalty” or “The prohibition of some or all outside competition in the sport involved in the latest major violation for one or two sports seasons” is applicable only to “repeat offenders”, the subject of sec. 19.5.2.3

Is Jerry Angelo fired yet?

by ES46NE10 on Aug 17, 2011 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Can we address

How ridiculous it is that the NCAA has a bylaw 19.5.2.3.2

by Terps12 on Aug 17, 2011 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Imposed penalities

Accordng to ESPN, the Committee on Infractions does not have the authority to impose the death penalty. They added that the COI doesn’t even have the authority to restrict TV appearances.

by wmterp on Aug 17, 2011 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

So, basically, they will skate.

And UMd got kicked off TV for a year for kids selling ACCT tix and driving a kid to class. Unbelievable.

"Complacency is your demise." - Kerry King

by duck on Aug 18, 2011 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, I guess...

this means we won’t have to worry about losing Miami to the SEC.

by retlag on Aug 17, 2011 12:29 AM EDT reply actions  

Surprised, but not shocked

You have to believe this type of stuff is going on all across college football (although highly unlikely at this magnitude).

What I find funny about this all is that all this “cheating” and attempts to woo these so called great players resulted in the worse half-decade stretch in the last 30 years of the Miami program…immediately following their natty in 2001, they had 2 coaches fired, several mediocre seasons, and no ACC CG appearances or BCS games

by tgrote on Aug 17, 2011 12:32 AM EDT reply actions  

This is 3X Ohio St. + UNC together

Sounds like the ultimate party school finally got caught.. All this was common knowledge years ago, but the NCAA had no proof.
Even if there are a bunch of suspensions, like UNC last year, the Terps better watch out. Rattlesnakes can still bite even if they’ve been chopped in half.

by Snappin Terp on Aug 17, 2011 12:35 AM EDT reply actions  

this was going on when Schnellenburger

started things up.

"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."

by bball purist on Aug 17, 2011 7:25 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

True dat!

You make my pee-pee maker t-t-tingle.

by Hey Yo! on Aug 17, 2011 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I caddied with a guy

who was studying “Phys Ed” at the U in the late 70’s-80’s during the start of Schnellenberger’s years.

He said at the time there were a couple of football players in his class who never came to a single class, didn’t show up for the final, and got a “C” grade. This S has been going on there forever! Being a naive HSer, I listened in disbelief!

"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."

by bball purist on Aug 17, 2011 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Howie was / is a crooked s.o.b!

You make my pee-pee maker t-t-tingle.

by Hey Yo! on Aug 17, 2011 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Edsall should be happy

He didn’t want to play this game first week anyway. He wanted a cupcake or two to get his the new offense together before easing into the ACC play.

IF they get all the suspensions for that game, I’ll be more than happy. A win is a win (assuming we beat them…).

by TerpJuice on Aug 17, 2011 12:40 AM EDT reply actions  

Robinson said on Sports Center that Shapiro named over 100 players and they could only corroborate 73. Even for Miami, this is an amazing story.

Baseball: the only sport whose commissioner wants you to think it is still 1960.

by phillies fan in bowie on Aug 17, 2011 12:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Miami will still pull of the victory.....

……

Anyways this is some rough material indeed, if this is true!

by Big Spoon on Aug 17, 2011 12:51 AM EDT reply actions  

This really is something else

I suspect the worst in most of these athletes and this is beyond anything I could have imagined.

Is Jerry Angelo fired yet?

by ES46NE10 on Aug 17, 2011 1:11 AM EDT reply actions  

"Show me the money"

The first thing I thought when I looked at this picture was dude looked like Tom Cruise at 50.

by #1terpsfan on Aug 17, 2011 1:29 AM EDT reply actions  

Gave it a little more thought

I’m kind of surprised to see no mention of PEDs, that would probably make this a newsworthy item for the next three months, and well, I would expect most of them are on something of the sort.

Miami fans (and arguably all football fans) should be glad at least that it was a “cheat to win” scandal and not something along the lines of point-shaving or god forbid game fixing. The program is going to be slammed, but that’s better than being wiped from the face of the earth entirely.

Is Jerry Angelo fired yet?

by ES46NE10 on Aug 17, 2011 2:04 AM EDT reply actions  

I guess Yahoo sports finally hit the big time,

never really took them all that serious. Anyways, Miami is post-toasties. Coaches, players, everyone was involved, and with all the stuff thats been going on over the past couple of years with rule breaking in CFB…they won’t see the death penalty but they’re f*****

by terps3 on Aug 17, 2011 2:09 AM EDT reply actions  

So true

They broke the Reggie Bush story if I recall correctly, and there have been reports of them turning their focus on long-form, investigative journalism while every other outlet goes the other way these days.

by schmeee on Aug 17, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can believe it

11 month investigation breaking the biggest NCAA scandal in years and not one other news source got word of it…impressive.

by terps3 on Aug 17, 2011 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Implications for the ACC as a whole?

On sportscenter tonight Pat Forde indicated that the Death Penalty was a possibility, since Miami could be viewed as a multiple offender. If he is correct (I have no idea if he is or not) and Miami’s program was eviscerated, wouldn’t that be a further blow to the ACC’s hopes to stay intact as currently constituted, on top of possible SEC poaching?

by BeverlyHillsTerp on Aug 17, 2011 3:05 AM EDT reply actions  

Maybe so...

but he’ll be flashing an “M” and “D” after it! lol

"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."

by bball purist on Aug 17, 2011 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

The NCAA does not necessarily have to rule them ineligible before the game. If they play, and are later ruled ineligible, they would have to vacate the game if they won. Unless they are ruled eligible, or it looks very likely, before the game, these guys wont play.

"Be polite to everyone you meet, but be prepared to kill anyone"-tc16cav

by otisnixon'sparty on Aug 17, 2011 4:44 AM EDT reply actions  

Golden might pull the players anyway to try and show the school is self imposing penalties to avoid the big penalties.

by grasshugger7 on Aug 17, 2011 8:55 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Doesn't every program

do the same thing? They want to show the NCAA that they’re willin’ to punish themselves rather than some ‘outsiders’….

by Big Spoon on Aug 17, 2011 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorta, this is a little different. Ray Ray Armstrong and the other guy he was on the recruiting visit that I cant think of his name could be ineligible for a year, or possibly forever.

"Be polite to everyone you meet, but be prepared to kill anyone"-tc16cav

by otisnixon'sparty on Aug 17, 2011 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

if a lot of the miami players are not playing vs md because of these allegations it might help miami in this one game. usually teams facing adversity play well in the game after the incident. long term it hurts but for one game it rally brings the team together. yrs ago when lou holtz was coaching arkansas several of their top players couldn’t play in the orange bowl vs a real good oklahoma team. ark won easily for back up players.

by fkterp on Aug 17, 2011 8:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Is our team that much worse than last years and are they that much better? We basically had them beat last year, why are all of you putting us as such underdogs to begin with?

by grasshugger7 on Aug 17, 2011 8:59 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

i don’t think it has to do with who is better on paper or, that we had them to the last min last yr. teams have away of overcoming adversity in the short term really well.

by fkterp on Aug 17, 2011 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

UMD is worse....

The “[]_[]” is better….

by Big Spoon on Aug 17, 2011 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

so what exactly does the NCAA Compliance Committee do?

I guess they stand around with their heads up their butts waiting for some outside agency to report a NCAA violation and only get involved if the story because national headlines. The NCAA really doesn’t care or want to know about the illegal recruiting activities that occur at 99% of universities and hopes it all goes unnoticed.

Kudos to Yahoo Sports and their reporters, they seem to be doing the work the NCAA is supposed to be doing!

You make my pee-pee maker t-t-tingle.

by Hey Yo! on Aug 17, 2011 9:25 AM EDT reply actions  

The Yahoo sports report is a very good read

For anyone with an attention span (or looking to kill time at work.) The story made the news on NPR this morning as well. All of the media attention will seemingly force the NCAA into swift action. Or at least, one would expect.

by NAmstrong on Aug 17, 2011 10:09 AM EDT reply actions  

God damn

Miami is in some deeeeep shit.

by terpfan812 on Aug 17, 2011 10:56 AM EDT reply actions  

I'll believe it when I see it.

The U makes the NCAA money, even in this down cycle. They won’t hurt them too bad. We will get practice time docked for some silly thing, and The U will skate. You watch.

"Complacency is your demise." - Kerry King

by duck on Aug 17, 2011 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Again, I get the cynicism

And it certainly isn’t misplaced, but I do think you’re underestimating the end result.

USC had two players receive major benefits w/ the knowledge of members of the coaching staffs. Ohio State had five players receive minor benefits w/ the knowledge of members of the coaching staff.

Miami, should this be proven, has 72 players receive major benefits with the knowledge of the coaching staff and, in some cases, at the behest of members from the coaching staff, which might be the real kicker. Comparing the situations is misleading, because they’re not on the same plane. What’s more, the compliance officers at Miami may not have the same plausible deniability the ones at OSU and USC had (they didn’t do their jobs properly, but they didn’t necessarily cheat) given that Shapiro picked fights with them and then they looked into him and said nothing. Regardless, 72 players over the course of 8 years should be much easier to spot than what USC and Ohio State had.

As for the money comment: yes, but A) not that much, and B) they stand to lose if they don’t deal with this properly. First, The U has no real fanbase to speak of anymore, provides minimal TV markets, and hasn’t been good in a decade. Miami makes money by being a part of pop culture and being 80s/90s cool, and this won’t stop either of those things. Merchandise will still sell.

Second, you have legitimate, respected journalists talking about the death penalty. This was on NPR. When OSU and USC were under investigation, people expected moderate sanctions and they got, well, not minimal, but probably a bit under moderate. Here, they’re expecting huge sanctions, and the NCAA knows that; if they let UM off easy, their reputation takes yet another big hit and all of the cynics in the fan world – and there are several – grow more and more dissatisfied with the hypocrisy of the college game. They know the effect that’ll have, too. We might not see huge sanctions, but I’d wager that they’ll be significant.

I know where you’re coming from, but the U should be hit pretty hard here. The saving grace for them is that the admin is different. No idea what effect that’ll have.

by Ben Broman on Aug 17, 2011 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Should be and will be are two different things.

Absolutely, Miami should basically be shut down for football (like SI suggested years ago), but at the end of the day, it will cost too much incoming revenue to the NCAA to actually enforce a meaningful punishment. Pryor got to PLAY in last year’s bowl game, even with everything the NCAA knew at the time. Cam Newton got to play (and never was penalized) after his dad was pocketing cash shaking down recruiters.

I have absolutely no faith whatsoever in the NCAA coming close to doing the right thing in this case. They’ve turned a blind eye to Coach K allowing Duke boosters hire players’ relatives (because I’m sure Chris Duhon’s mom was the best hire for that job) and Jim Calhoun paying off AAU coaches under the guise of exhibition games to land recruits.

Miami will skate, in relativbe terms. Sure, they may lose a few scholarships, get a sternly-worded letter and kids on the current team may be suspended for a game or two, but in the end, they’re gonna get away with it. The money programs always do.

"Complacency is your demise." - Kerry King

by duck on Aug 17, 2011 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just to add to the Miami disgrace

Here’s the account of why Miami should have known – Shapiro actually tried to punch The U’s compliance director IN THE FACE at halftime of the last Orange Bowl home game at halftime. And they still let him contirbute money and hang around the rpogram.

"Complacency is your demise." - Kerry King

by duck on Aug 17, 2011 12:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Just a notch below the SMU scandal.

This is almost as bad, but I seem to recall that SMU’s board of directors put together the slush fund used to pay current and former players. Seems there was actual/constructive knowledge that this was going on with Miami’s administration, but it doesn’t look like they stepped in and said “Hey, we run this cheating thing better than you boosters etc.”.

Bottom line is that it is really embarrassing for the ACC right now with Miami, UNC and Ga. Tech all having major violation issues at the same time.

by RaleighTerp on Aug 17, 2011 12:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Cheating and still losing

So now two prominent ACC football teams have been exposed for NCAA violations. Somehow, despite the alleged advantage these teams should have, they still underperformed and the ACC still has a poor out of conference showing. What does that say about ACC football? Are the other conferences better cheaters? or is the ACC so weak that even major cheating isn’t enough to compete?

by sgeorge on Aug 17, 2011 2:26 PM EDT reply actions  

it means they were partying so hard

they couldn’t muster the energy to play winning football. How the heck did these guys graduate?

You make my pee-pee maker t-t-tingle.

by Hey Yo! on Aug 17, 2011 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

plus

an allegation against Coach K in the wings

by Lucky Horseshoe on Aug 17, 2011 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Little history reminder for younguns

In ’84, when Jimmy Johnson took over the Hurricanes:

One of Jimmy Johnson’s immediate priorities upon taking over as Miami head coach was to switch to a 4–3 defense.41 Johnson wanted to implement the change for his first season, but lacking the time, personnel, and staff, he decided to postpone the switch and kept Schnellenberger’s 5–2 defensive package for the 1984 season.
The team struggled to an 8–5 record in Johnson’s first season, losing a number of noteworthy games. In the next-to-last game of the regular season, the No. 6 Hurricanes squandered a 31–0 halftime lead against Maryland and lost 42–40 in what was then the biggest comeback in NCAA football history.

"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."

by bball purist on Aug 17, 2011 3:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Something noted in Pat Forde's article today

“As required by NCAA legislation for any institution involved in a major infractions case, Miami shall be subject to the provisions of NCAA Bylaw 19.6.2.3, concerning repeat violators, for a five-year period beginning on the effective date of the penalties in this case, February 27, 2003.”

Pretty sure some of the years 2002 – 2010 fall under that five year period from Feb 27 2003, which kind of changes the entire game and not in a good way.

Is Jerry Angelo fired yet?

by ES46NE10 on Aug 17, 2011 9:49 PM EDT reply actions  

I didn't get it at first

But you didn’t mention that that language comes from the baseball violations. They were on baseball probation from that date, so yeah, they can be considered “repeat offenders” during that time frame. So the death penalty is on the table if the NCAA wants to talk about it.

by Ben Broman on Aug 18, 2011 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Maryland Terrapins.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Nattybocrab_small
ACC better go down fighting (Rant)
Scheyerface2_small
Dwayne Morgan
Small
Stoglin in the NBA
M_small
Diggsmas in May?
Argh_calvin_jpg__small
Big Ten Network makes a profit of $79 million
Terps_kool-aid_small
New 2013 SG - RJ Curington
Maryland_flag_small
Russell Wilson Rule
Md_flag_small
Can We Dance With Aronhalt?
Mar5_mercator_small
Another Maryland B-ball team on "The Bubble"
Small
What does the ACC offer? -from FSU

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Share This Post


Managers

Testudotimes_small Ben Broman

Authors

Garyland_logo_small Dave Tucker

Mensbasketball-1024_small Ben Goldstein

251084_1429730463099_1227960970_31127493_2195273_n_small Pete Volk