Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Events Cause Mariners To Lose To Rangers

Rion Brown and Miami Burst Maryland's NCAA Tournament Bubble, Upend Terps 80-66

Maryland doesn't always get burnt by a team's random bench player, but it sure does seem like it. The latest culprit: Miami's Rion Brown, who scored 19 points against Maryland in an 80-66 win for the Hurricanes.

Brown normally averages 3.7 ppg and hadn't scored more than 9 points since a game against McNeese St. back in November, but tonight he summoned the spirit of Erick Green and Leslie McDonald - both whom unexpectedly torched Maryland in previous games - to shoot an unbelievable 6-7 from beyond the arc (he didn't even attempt a 2-pointer). Coming into the game, he had made six three-pointers total in ACC play. So yes, in one game, he doubled the number of threes he hit in conference play. Lax three-point defense will do that.

Brown's unexpected 19 points and Reggie Johnson's 12-point, 15-rebound game was enough to carry Miami over the Terrapins, and it probably spelled the end of the road for Maryland. The Terrapins' best player was Terrell Stoglin (perhaps unsurprisingly), and he led all scorers with 20 points. Jordan Williams, normally Maryland's star, shot 3-17 from the field - not an easy feat when all of his attempted shots are within about 6 feet of the basket.

The start of the game was relatively even, with Maryland holding an early 10-8 lead. But the Terrapins underwent a four-minute scoreless streak, and Miami took advantage with a 15-4 run. After that, Maryland never got closer than 8 in the first half, and Miami took a 13-point lead into the break. Maryland fought back to get within 5 in the second half, but terrible perimeter defense and great outside shooting from Miami made sure they wouldn't get closer.

More thoughts post-jump:

Star-divide

Maryland did a lot of the little things well. They shot well from outside (50%). They won the turnover battle, which they had to do. And they even won the rebounding battle. Unfortunately, none of that matters when they shoot 34% from the field and let the opposition shoot 55%.

For once, it's pretty simple: Maryland couldn't make shots, and Miami could. It's basic, but that's what it boils down to. The shooting percentages tell you everything you need to know about this game.

And I hate to criticize Maryland's best player, but Jordan Williams was a pretty sizable reason for that. He was faced with something new tonight: someone so large he couldn't get past, through, or around. Reggie Johnson is a solid 300, so Jordan was stymied in the post. He turned to a little turnaround, fadeaway jumper, and it's just not a shot in his arsenal. He shot 3-10 in the first half and didn't make a single bucket in the second. I'd wager at least 8 of his 17 shots were turnaround jumpers.

Maybe he has the flu, which was the rumor after the UNC game, during which he was also poor. Something seems to be affecting him, whatever it is. His level of play has taken a nosedive lately, and that effectively ends Maryland's chances at making a serious run. He was unquestionably outplayed by Johnson tonight.

Going back to the shooting thing for a second: Maryland doesn't have the worst three-point defense in the world, but sometimes they could fool you with it. Since ACC play started, they've been 9th in the conference in 3pt defense. I'm expecting that to drop to at least 10th after tonight's 12-23 (52%) fiasco. Miami got open looks - Rion Brown especially - and they hit them. It was a pretty poor defensive performance on the perimeter (late closeouts happened way too much) and it's reflected in the stats.

Another defensive note: I was worried about Miami's scoring ability before the game, and I happened to be right (not to brag). The Canes had 5 players in double-figures, each with at least 12. They have four legitimate scorers and found a fifth tonight in Brown; that's tough to match up with.

On the other side, Maryland has one legitimate scorer these days - Stoglin - and he does just about all he can. It's not enough to get the occasional 8-to-12 point game out of one of the upperclassmen; Maryland needs some offensive consistency, and they have none.

There seems to be a lack of leadership, experience, chemistry, or some other unquantifiable value in the locker room at this point. Maryland looked disorganized and - dare I say it - disinterested at times tonight. Worse, they've been faced with two straight critical, all-but-must-wins in the ACC, and they laid first-half eggs in both of them. I'm guessing the lack of leadership from the seniors hurts there. No matter the reason, that's on the team (or coach) somewhere, and it's disheartening.

One final, supremely unimportant note: Mychal Parker got first-half playing time, and more than just a token minute or two to light a fire under the starters. More than a few questions have been asked about Parker's lack of playing time in spite of his high ranking, so it was good to finally see him get some serious burn (about four minutes in the first half). He looks kind of awkward, but that's to be expected with so little time under his belt. If nothing else, he was active; he wasn't great, but hey: he played. So there was that.

The season is pretty much lost for Maryland barring a miracle ACC tournament run that's almost certainly not coming. It's more constructive (and less painful) at this point to just look forward to the future, and it's a pretty bright one. My closing advice: instead of fretting over the failed senior campaigns of Adrian Bowie and Cliff Tucker, dream of a future including Faust, Breunig, Stoglin, and Williams. You'll feel better, trust me.

Comment 89 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I thought

Gary almost declined it a few years back when we were 8-8 in conference, had 20 wins, and didn’t get into the tourney. He was real pissed but ultimately accepted the NIT bid and if I recall correctly, NCM, Strawberry, et al lossed in the 1st round of the NIT

by spivy on Mar 2, 2011 9:35 PM EST reply actions  

You are correct

To Manhattan I believe.

GW PLEASE DECLINE

by TERP4LIFE96 on Mar 2, 2011 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Please, don't act like we don't "deserve" to have to play in the NIT

Because after this season (unless we can string together 4 wins in the ACC tourney) we deserve the NIT and only the NIT. Plus, that actually is a good experience for a team, regardless of the fact that us fans may be too prideful to admit it.

by beavs on Mar 3, 2011 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

He didn't accept it

Chairman Yow accepted it without Gary’s knowledge. She made Gary go back out and “gracefully” accept the invitation after Gary told the press he was going to decline it.

by nebakanezer on Mar 3, 2011 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

kool aid?

After that embarassing loss, the poor game plan again, and just an overall lack of effort an execution should we give up on the season?!? I think so. Is it time to possibly start thinking of a replacement plan? Strong possibility as we have been unable to compete year in and year out consistently. Yes we tied for the regular season champ last year but how often do we do that? It all comes back to recruiting. Last year we had 1 nba player and 2 other professionals as seniors… This year… Dino will play somewhere… Not sure about the others. Better recruiting equals more wins. Throw out nc state and find another team that lands top recruits and it doesn’t equal wins. Sad to say but we aren’t even a top 40 basketball program anymore… Unbelievable. So sad for me to admit that a school like memphis has more going for it then md. Saddd. That’s all from me… I’m going to drink in charleston. I’m out

by Charlotte NC Terp on Mar 2, 2011 9:36 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

back down to Earth...back down to Earth...hello

too much kool-aid too much…this is a bunch of manure…sometimes our recruits just fizzle out like old soda…this team needs to move on and without a big coming in we’re not going anywhere fast…too many holes…i never thought i’d say this but it’s time to consider i mean we really need to think about everything… the NIT is going to be downright embarassing…we have become like NC State without the happies…atleast Parker got to play. it’s been a freakin tough season

by terpsontop on Mar 3, 2011 6:14 AM EST up reply actions  

I live in Memphis.

Trust me, Memphis is far worse than the Terps this season.

by Jason Middlekauff on Mar 2, 2011 9:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Gtech, Marquette and Memphis

None of those teams have wins to equal their recruiting success.

by settleten on Mar 2, 2011 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Season Almost Over-Questions answered

I’d love for people to go back to November. Look at all the questions we had surrounding this team. Who replaces the scoring? Who leads the team? Where do the freshmen fit in? Can Tucker, Bowie, and Gregory expand their roles? What about an outside threat?

We’ve almost come to the end of this season and we got our answers.
Stoglin has shown a knack for the hoop the past few games along with double double machine Williams -that’s it. Still haven’t found a leader. Howard and Stoglin look legit and Paulson may be able to turn into a contributor. Still have no idea why Parker was M.I.A. all season. The seniors are all role players even Gregory. I love Dino and he works hard but he’s a limited player. No consistent 3 point threat to speak of.

Gary should not be immune to criticism. He earned COY last season and the man can still coach. But his recruiting has been questioned since 2002. I applaud him for not dealing with the AAU mess but that also means that he will always miss out on the big names. His old school style may be outdated at this point. He’s getting up in age so you wonder how much longer he’ll be sweating up and down the sidelines. He’s not changing a thing so either he chooses how much longer he’s going to go or someone makes that choice for him.

"Have a good time...all the time." - Viv Savage

by Jergs on Mar 2, 2011 11:08 PM EST up reply actions  

The last two years of recruiting

look pretty good. 3 if you count Jordan Williams’ class.

We’ll see how they all turn out but this years class looks good, in hindsight last years class was great with one star (Stoglin) a starter (Howard) and a contributor (Hawk), and in hindsight 2009’s class was good as we got another star in Jordan Williams.

Yes, his recruiting for this senior class did not turn out well and it’s killing us but lately, it seems to be looking up. The team seems to be on an upswing.

That’s my hope at least.

When you're rich you don't write checks - Randy Moss

by s.r.genovese on Mar 3, 2011 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Of course

Here comes Charlotte NC Terp’s weekly “Optimist’s Address on Recruiting and Coaching” speech again. That really is all you talk about. You must not have read the last response I posted to your previous annoying post. What you fail to recognize in the midst of your rambling is the fact that this year’s disappointment with our seniors is not a result of poor recruiting, and for that matter, poor coaching. Honestly, Gary just caught a patch of bad luck as what looked like a hugely promising class turned out to not live up to their potential. When you look back at 2007’s recruiting class, you might realize why we’re shaking our heads now – because it had a great deal of upside. With Bowie, Tucker, Gregory, and Braxton Dupree signed, and Augustus Gilchrist and Shane Walker verbally committed (totaling four 3 stars and three 4stars), it was huge recruiting year for Gary by the numbers. As we all know now, Gilchrist and Walker didn’t qualify (potentially our two best recruits) and over the years Tucker, Bowie, and Gregory never materialized to fit the mold of Gary’s typical 3-4 star blue collar recruits-turned-All-ACC players. There isn’t another year where that has happened that I can remember. Due to the high number of recruits in 2007, we had only a couple scholarships to give away in ‘08, which led to the signing of only Shawn Mosely and Jin Soo Kim, where the real egg was laid. Obviously, Mosely hasn’t really become what he at one time was thought to be capable of, and Kim left (thank God), but luckily that class’ poor performance has been made up by ‘09 and ’10’s, and what ’11’s class will bring obviously looks enticing. So before you start trashing the program once again and labeling us as “not even a top 40 basketball program anymore,” then take a damn deep breath and start trying to look at things with a different perspective.

by beavs on Mar 3, 2011 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Right on Beav

The problem was that we did not recruit enough leftovers, injured, or unable to qualify in 07. And your right again, Gary just has had bad luck for the last 8 years on the recruiting trail. Your perspective hasn’t changed much. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid.

by clevesanterp on Mar 3, 2011 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

All you've admitted in that post

is that 1) you’re an idiot 2) you lack basic reading comprehension skills and 3) you and Charlotte NC Terp both have depressing lives of complaining and pessimism, because if that is all you got from my post you live in a world that I am damn sure glad I don’t.

by beavs on Mar 4, 2011 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

I think the only time to decline an NIT bid would be if the team

were clearly robbed of an NCAA bid. That’s obviously not the case with this team.

Could someone with a better eye than I have for X’s and O’s explain why the Terps’ perimeter defense is so pitiful? What am I missing? I mean, how hard is it to recognize you can’t let someone come down the court, pick a spot to stand, catch the ball, and shoot uncontested jump shots?

by Jason Middlekauff on Mar 2, 2011 9:39 PM EST reply actions  

athletes

We really don’t have the athletes to match up usually. Our 2 and 3 wing players just don’t cut it. We are set at the 1 and 5 but we don’t play together. Gary has stoglin pushing it to much and takes jwill outta the game. On defense we are under sized at the 1-3 position and they shoot over us. I mean I could keep this going but there are way more then just one or two issues unfortunately. K now I’m really going to drink now. Have a good night everyone. Better days ahead I hope

by Charlotte NC Terp on Mar 2, 2011 9:53 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Don't agree

The talk at the early part of this season was this was one of the more athletic teams MD has had in a while. As Ben alluded to above, there is an intangible “attitude of winning” that is lacking on this team. A mental toughness. At this level, everyone has skills, but its the guys that refuse to lose and keep coming at you that win games.

Its weird to see a GW team with its back up against the wall crumple. Not our MO.

by Testudo1 on Mar 3, 2011 8:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Athleticism

does not equal good basketball players. We lacked more than an ‘attitude of winning,’ we just lacked guys who could make shots consistently, make three-pointers….ever, and rebound. If you can’t do those things well, you’re not going to beat many teams, no matter how athletic you are.

When you're rich you don't write checks - Randy Moss

by s.r.genovese on Mar 3, 2011 9:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes tonight.

Check their season stats for 3-point shooting.

When you're rich you don't write checks - Randy Moss

by s.r.genovese on Mar 3, 2011 10:01 AM EST up reply actions  

That is my point

We have better athletes this year, but they lack focus and the killer instinct to put teams away. Missing layups, free throws and turning it over down the stretch are mental things. 3 point shots, I’ll give you that. We don’t have that guy . . . yet.

Don’t get me wrong, physical talent matters. You can’t teach height or speed. But Juan and Greivis are not the most athletic players MD has had. Those guys had the intangibles and attitude that made them winners.

by Testudo1 on Mar 3, 2011 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Terrible

March Madness is so much less exciting without the Terps. Hopefully they made a serious run next weekend…

by TerpFan2001 on Mar 2, 2011 9:40 PM EST reply actions  

I can be Bob

Let’s talk. What do you want to know?

and lets go to Bentleys...

by johnnyrobs13 on Mar 3, 2011 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Good Question

Realistically: 20-25%
Unrealistically: 50%

Anyone else?

and lets go to Bentleys...

by johnnyrobs13 on Mar 3, 2011 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

It means

doing what you do better than what the person next to you does best

In terms of basketball, it means:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqP6ovxngjA

and lets go to Bentleys...

by johnnyrobs13 on Mar 3, 2011 9:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Who are we to decline an NIT bid?

Maybe if you’re Kansas you can get pissy about an NIT bid, not if you’re a regular in that tournament. Shit, they may as well call it the Maryland Invitiation Tournament.

Watching Gus Gilchrist’s past two games isn’t helping my mood any either.

by GPT on Mar 2, 2011 9:44 PM EST reply actions  

Yea....I'm just selfish

don’t want to watch this team anymore, because I will, even if it’s the NIT….

by TERP4LIFE96 on Mar 2, 2011 9:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn't get a chance to watch the game

but I wonder did we double down on the big men to leave the three open? It happened a lot this year because of the lack of height inside.

by clevesanterp on Mar 2, 2011 9:45 PM EST reply actions  

That could be an issue. I just don't know why during the course of a game

if the team is getting hot from 3, they wouldn’t stop doubling down and stay with the shooters.

by Jason Middlekauff on Mar 2, 2011 10:02 PM EST up reply actions  

NIT bid

Why would you decline? No reason to. Maryland needs experience at this point, and the NIT would give it to them.

by Ben Broman on Mar 2, 2011 10:00 PM EST reply actions  

hopefully we get a bid?

hope that’s a joke. we’ll probably be a 1 or 2 seed in the NIT if we don’t have any luck in the ACC tourney

by beavs on Mar 3, 2011 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

you mean...

we will be a 1 or 2 seed in the NIT if we have any luck in the ACC tourney hahaha ha

and lets go to Bentleys...

by johnnyrobs13 on Mar 3, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Sportscenter just showed an updated Lunardi's last 4 in, etc.

We were the 7th team out…not sure if his list was updated before or after our game, but if it was, we might still have a chance at an at large bid.

Not saying we have a chance to win 3-4 games in a row, but if we do, we might still have a chance.

by aholla30 on Mar 2, 2011 10:06 PM EST reply actions  

It was not updated.

Memphis was last team in, and they lost.

Sooooooooo…forget last 4 in, first four out business. Win the ACC tourney and we’re in.

Which we won’t do.

by kckb8 on Mar 2, 2011 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Why decline???

MD is a young team and game experience is important no matter what tourny. I can see a senior laden team wanting to decline the NIT but a young still inexperienced team like MD can definitely benefit.

by MoCounty11 on Mar 2, 2011 10:07 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Also...

Dave Telep reporting, Big John Thompson and JT3 are watching G Whittington tonight who MD recently offered.

by MoCounty11 on Mar 2, 2011 10:09 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

NIT Decline - My bad for even mentioning

see my last post, just want to be done watching this team.

by TERP4LIFE96 on Mar 2, 2011 10:09 PM EST reply actions  

Agree we need experience

UNC was an NIT team last season, and look at them now. It will give our younger players continued experience playing against all different teams. Some years are just NIT years, others aren’t. Gary’s going to build the program again, that’s what he does.

http://bit.ly/gke6Za >> on the game

by EMK22 on Mar 2, 2011 10:58 PM EST reply actions  

The NIT

had nothing to do with how good Carolina is this year. Look at their roster now compared to last year. Carolina is better because Roy realized he had a crap team and went out and RECRUITED an entire new roster. Not happening here.

by nebakanezer on Mar 3, 2011 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Well I guess there's only 1 thing left to do........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMCaHxZuf94

tried to embed it but couldn’t get it to work

clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose!
smoke'em if ya got'em!

by Daniel Hamilton on Mar 2, 2011 11:03 PM EST reply actions  

Disarray

I can’t help but suspect divisiveness, or at least bad chemistry in the Terps locker room. May have something to do with Jordan saying he preferred to go with the young guys a few weeks ago.. From that point it seems to me that the old guys have been worse than useless. Shame.

by King of France on Mar 2, 2011 11:04 PM EST reply actions  

If they decline you have to question why

If you are interested in getting better and building for the future you want to play. If Gary were to decline I’d question his enthusiasm to coach anymore.

The seniors time should be limited and you need to get these guys some time. Does tonight’s Parker sighting mean he may see more actual real honest minutes?

"Have a good time...all the time." - Viv Savage

by Jergs on Mar 2, 2011 11:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think Dino, Adrian, and even Cliff deserve to end their careers on the bench at the NIT.

They should have the opportunity to play to win the tournament.. That’s the rub.

by wmterp on Mar 2, 2011 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I need to clarify my comment

I don’t think Adrian and Dino have been useless in establishing the right chemistry for this team. Ideally you want the older players to show the younger players how to win at the ACC level. At a minimum, you want them to show the younger duys how not to beat ourselves. Both have done okay as role players.

by wmterp on Mar 3, 2011 7:42 AM EST up reply actions  

It seems they never got over

the colapse at Villanova…ever since that game they just have not played with the same intensity on defense…this team was really good defensively early in the year, it kept them in games. The last couple of weeks it seems the other way around, where their offense kept them in games.

by musicturtle on Mar 2, 2011 11:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree.

’Nova was the end of our season.

by kckb8 on Mar 2, 2011 11:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Flat, Disappointing, Uninspired

What a bad game. The only thing worse than the Terps performance was the crap ESPNU play-by-play guy. Who was that clown?

by terpapins on Mar 2, 2011 11:13 PM EST reply actions  

At least

We can root for Clemson against VT now without worrying about our tournament chances.

If VT misses the tournament, and Greenberg has another public outburst blasting the selection committee, that would make up for us missing the tournament.

by aholla30 on Mar 2, 2011 11:17 PM EST reply actions  

Nothing positive from this debacle...

Brown had actually made 7 three pointers in ACC play before this game but who’s counting it’s still pathetic how the Terps allowed yet another scrub to go off against them.

The seniors stink, Mosley has regressed and this is one of the first times that a Gary Williams coached Terp team hasn’t improved as the season progressed.

Can’t wait to see a half empty Comcast on Senior Day and see how pissed Gary is that no one showed up for his NIT team in a meaningless game…

by warnerjohn on Mar 3, 2011 12:02 AM EST reply actions  

Via Patrick Stevens

“Terrell Stoglin now has as many 20-point games in his career (four) as Adrian Bowie and Cliff Tucker combined.”

Wow

by UMD2012 on Mar 3, 2011 12:20 AM EST reply actions  

I think

There is a real lack of chemistry. Its seem like when ever Stoglin gets it, more the most part he shoots it(which I dont mind cause i have a real prefrence towards him), and when ever JWill gets it…he shoots it. JWill’s game has really been exposed over the past few games and It started with the UVA when he couldnt take that one guy one on one.
 I honestly dont think this team communicates well at all, its seems half of their problems is that they dont trust each other and communicate effectively.
And as Gary said in the EPSN All-Access, if you want to win, you have to talk. And that is almost rule one of basketball all the way down to middle school.

Lastly get Parker more minutes. He played solid def and seems like a well-rounded athlete. He looks shy on offense but who wouldnt in his position….unless if your name is Stogs!!!

by MurlandTerps on Mar 3, 2011 12:57 AM EST reply actions  

Stat to keep in mind

We are the only ACC team to win at least 7 conference games every year for the past 18 years. Not even Duke or UNC can say that.

by aholla30 on Mar 3, 2011 1:00 AM EST reply actions  

This loss changes nothing

to UMD’s post-season chances; if UMD can win 4 straight either starting Saturday against UVA or in the ACCT, then UMD will be in the NCAAT either as an at large or as ACCT winners.

You make my pee-pee maker t-t-tingle.

by Hey Yo! on Mar 3, 2011 9:39 AM EST reply actions  

ESPNU All Insider Access: Terps

Did anyone else catch this last night? Good stuff!

Go Terps!!!

by jonnyboy383 on Mar 3, 2011 9:59 AM EST reply actions  

thoughts on the NIT.....current roster

if selected to the NIT..we should take it…the young players need as much experience and exposure as possible…..

not sure that Bowie,Mosley, et al are really playing any worse than JW….sure he got his doubles/doubles but at what cost…..and how has he dominated in league play…lets see some average guys at Duke outplayed him…..UNC …Va Tech….et al..he just has not produced..only jumps and fights for rebounds occasionally…is unable to complete 3 point plays….capable of the occasional good looking reverse layup under he basket…not capable of jump shot or bank shot unless directly under basket…need lots of work this summer….

in other words everybody playing up to talent level……not a criticism of individual player(except of recruiting) I think they are playing up to their level….they would all be " off the bench" players for Duke or UNC

however..I am very excited about the future,,perhaps even next year…..our present freshmen guards have more potential than we have seen for a while…..Hawk in a starting role might be a different player….Williams , with lots of work, will be a better player next year( frankly he should be embarrassed after the past couple of weeks)…. the question is where is the forward or “big man” support coming from…find that and we have a team…

by charlessr on Mar 3, 2011 10:49 AM EST reply actions  

I think more important than another big man is the need for a reliable 3 pt shooter.

I am hoping Faust is that guy(and if Gibbs can stroke, that would be bonus). I think Breunig and hopefully Pankey will add a lot to our front court already. We need a perimeter assassin.

by 1 proud terp on Mar 3, 2011 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Nah, JW is fine, it's just that

Every team is geared to stop him using the zone.

Go Terps!!!

by jonnyboy383 on Mar 3, 2011 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

No

We went because, unknown to Gary, Debbie Yow had already told the NIT Committee that we were accepting their bid. As with bowl games, coaches don’t accept or decline bids, AD’s do. She made him go back out and announce that MD would accept the invitation. Had nothing to do with Dean Smith.

by nebakanezer on Mar 3, 2011 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

NIT bid

The NCAA now owns and operates the NIT. There is ZERO chance we turn down a bid. I don’t think anyone has done that since the switch to NCAA ownership.

It would be remember come selection sunday next season.

by Terpentine on Mar 3, 2011 1:12 PM EST reply actions  

plus it brings it added $$$

You make my pee-pee maker t-t-tingle.

by Hey Yo! on Mar 3, 2011 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

it costs $ is travel costs

even the home games lose $. It’s a net loss.

by spreToG on Mar 3, 2011 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

This one is tough!!!

If we had the traditional schedule we normally haveand then had to play in a down ACC, we would have been exactly like VTech was last year. GW had to schedule tough. I mean, if we won those games we were supposed to win this past November, finishing 9-7 or 8-8 in this year’s ACC would not have been bad (assuming that we beat 3 teams out of the Pitt, Illinois, Temple & Villanova games we played this year…all winnable by the way).

Unfortunately, we f’ed up against Temple, Pitt & Villanova…and then we lost at home to BC…then got blown out at home by VaTech…etc etc. So sad.

It is going to be a looong month for me this month…having to hear about all the NCAA banter, knowing that me Terps will be in the NIT. I see how UNC fans felt last year. This really hurts.

by BlackTerp on Mar 3, 2011 5:59 PM EST reply actions  

If we just hit our dang free throws against

Nova, Pitt and Temple….. we are looking at the tourny right now…

by MurlandTerps on Mar 3, 2011 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Should've Could've

But we didnt maryland is an average basketball program and will remain that way until Mr. WILLIAMS Adapt to modern recruiting practices… Its kind of a shame gary is too bull headed to change his ways its like asking a player to work on his game in the offseason and the player being like please im already good. Some say gary is entitled to that right.

by valenciais1 on Mar 3, 2011 7:37 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

TOKOTO

is he making his announcement tonight?

by 1 proud terp on Mar 3, 2011 7:30 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Maryland Terrapins.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Nattybocrab_small
ACC better go down fighting (Rant)
Scheyerface2_small
Dwayne Morgan
Small
Stoglin in the NBA
M_small
Diggsmas in May?
Argh_calvin_jpg__small
Big Ten Network makes a profit of $79 million
Terps_kool-aid_small
New 2013 SG - RJ Curington
Maryland_flag_small
Russell Wilson Rule
Md_flag_small
Can We Dance With Aronhalt?
Mar5_mercator_small
Another Maryland B-ball team on "The Bubble"
Small
What does the ACC offer? -from FSU

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Share This Post


Managers

Testudotimes_small Ben Broman

Authors

Garyland_logo_small Dave Tucker

Mensbasketball-1024_small Ben Goldstein

251084_1429730463099_1227960970_31127493_2195273_n_small Pete Volk