Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yu Darvish Diagnosed With Mariners Fever

Maryland-Alabama Preview: Terps, Tide Tip Off in Puerto Rico

ATLANTA, GA - MARCH 11:  JaMychal Green #1 and Trevor Releford #12 of the Alabama Crimson Tide celebrate after drawing a foul during the quarterfinals of the SEC Men's Basketball Tournament at Georgia Dome on March 11, 2011 in Atlanta, Georgia.  (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

And just like that, here comes the first real test of the season for Mark Turgeon and the Maryland Terrapins. After dealing with UNC-Wilmington in a 71-62 warm-up victory, the Terps now head south for the first of three games in the Puerto Rico Tip-Off. Their draw? The Alabama Crimson Tide, ranked 15th in the country.

Yeah, these things get going fast.

The Tide were one of the more head-scratching teams from last season, starting miserably - they lost to Providence, Iowa, and Seton Hall early in the year - before turning things around late and winning 10 of their last 13 to fight their way into the NCAA Tournament picture. They didn't quite get in, but they rampaged through the NIT before falling to Wichita State in the final.

They did lose two starters - forward Chris Hines and guard Charvez Davis - plus their sixth man, guard Senario Hillman, from that team. Despite that, they likely emerged as a strong squad than last year. For one, the three starters they do return were far-and-away their three most important players: center JaMychal Green, combo forward Tony Mitchell, and point guard Trevor Releford. That trio accounted for the Tide's top three scorers, their top two rebounders, and their top assist man, meaning what was lost from the squad was mostly peripheral.

Star-divide

And it's likely that the replacements for Hines, Davis, and Hillman are actually more talented, thanks to Anthony Grant's monster recruiting class. (I still think he would've been Sean Miller-level perfect for Maryland's opening.) The group is headlined by three swingmen: former five-star Trevor Lacey and former four-stars and top-50 prospects Rodney Cooper and Levi Randolph. Though inexperienced, the group should easily be able to make up the 20 or so points Hines, Davis, and Hillman had per game.

The big names, though, remain Green, Mitchell, and Releford. Green, a 6-8 center and First Team All-SEC pick, is one of the best big men in the country and should cause major, major problems for the Terrapins' front line. The problems Green poses are pretty simple: he's big, he's talented, and he's experienced, which is just about the opposite of Maryland's front court right now. He's more of a banger than, say, a Duncan-type, meaning he doesn't possess a particularly refined inside game or the ability to step outside, but he has great touch around the hoop and works hard to get position. I'm hoping Aston Pankey, the most physically developed and athletic of Maryland's big men, is the one to match up with him, though the presence of Mitchell may make that a bit tricky.

Speaking of: Mitchell is a more interesting character. He's only 6-6 and probably projects as an NBA 2, but mans the 4 for Alabama. He's disruptive, active, energetic, and tough, which is part of the reason he can pull it off. He's an extraordinary rebounder for his size and has emerged as the offense's #2 scoring option despite not really having a refined offensive game. He's not going to kill you from outside - he's a 29% career outside shooter - but he's dangerous as a slasher or operating off-the-ball, where he often scores off of cuts or garbage buckets (put-backs and the like). Like a rich man's Sean Mosley.

Releford is the other big player, and I really do love his game. He was made the starting point guard as a true freshman last year, and did really well in a somewhat high-pressure situation as the team's third-leading scorer (11.0 ppg) and leading assist man (3.4 apg). He's a bit of a Stoglin-like character, as he's not physically imposing (only 6-1) but is surprisingly quick and loves to get out and run, though he's more toned-down than we've seen Stoglin play recently and a better pure point. It's likely that those two will match up with each other, and it should be a battle, especially because we've seen Stoglin get a chip on his shoulder in situations like these before.

As you might be able to tell, Alabama is a good but not quite great offensive team. As their wings progress they'll likely be tough to stop in the half-court, but right now they're still not there yet. I haven't watched enough Bama games to know for sure, but if I had to guess I'd say they'd be prone to having the occasional half-court problems, given that their top scorers are a banger in the post, an energy player, and a quick point guard who thrives on the transition game or slashing to the hoop. If Green can be stopped - a big if, though I'll be intrigued to see how Pankey handles him - I'm wondering if the other guys can truly pick up the slack.

Where they really thrive is on the other end of the court, where they're one of the best in the country. Green is susceptible to get beaten by some more physically developed big men, but there aren't too many of those floating around the NCAA. Past that, Releford's quickness is problem-causing and disruptive, and Mitchell is again sort of like a more athletic Mosley. They were in the top 10 last year in defensive efficiency, and through two games this year they're at #9. We saw some serious issues with Maryland's offense against UNC-Wilmington, particularly with regards to lazy passing and poor shooting, and if they reappear on Thursday you can be sure the Tide will feast on them.

Strangely, Alabama doesn't really like to get out and run - they were one of the slower teams in the country last year (257th in tempo) and have been even slower this year (294th). Basically, when Releford doesn't push the issue, they slow it down and grind it out. Maryland will likely do the same, no matter how much better I think they'd do if they tried to become a transition team. Obviously, that plays into Alabama's favor, as at least right now they seem to be the better team. Playing them the way they want to play isn't likely to cause them any problems.

I do think Alabama might be a bit worse than their #15 ranking, unless the NCAA is way worse this year than I had expected. But they're not a good match-up for the Terrapins, with a dominant big man, a slow tempo, and a suffocating defense. Maryland will have to be much more tidy than they were on Sunday to have a real shot at this one, and James Padgett or Ashton Pankey will have to show up with another unexpected performance.

As a happy sidenote: you may remember the last time the Terrapins played in the Puerto Rico Tip-Off (then branded as the Puerto Rico Shootout) as the event where Steve Francis made essentially his national debut. Maryland was ranked #5 in the country, and they beat 10th-ranked UCLA 70-54 before demolishing a hapless Pitt 87-52 in the final. Francis dropped 18 and 19 in the final two games, respectively.

Comment 54 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

we have a shot

idk how good of a shot, but i think the teams that have dominant guards (ala UNC) or BIG and dominant frontcourt players (ala, well, UNC again) are gonna be the ones that really beat us up. Green is very good but Bama seems a little undersized, like us.

by terps3030 on Nov 16, 2011 2:48 PM EST reply actions  

I just hope

it doesn’t get too ugly too quick. Would love to see MD compete. Will the game be on TV?

by Terpnation on Nov 16, 2011 2:52 PM EST reply actions  

Game is on ESPN2

The game is on ESPN2: Thursday, 11/17, 5:00pm.

by Michelangelo on Nov 16, 2011 2:57 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Im excited to watch this game

and see how the team reacts to a legitimate challenge. I know we have the potential to compete, I just wish this game were later in the season…

by Harrison Linder on Nov 16, 2011 2:58 PM EST reply actions  

they have a shot

alabama is a bit overrated and they really have a woeful kind of offense. they’re good up front but also really shallow. they realize this and score off their defense and in the half court.
if the terps stay focused they can compete.

by space_ on Nov 16, 2011 3:37 PM EST reply actions  

Slow it down will help

because of our lack of depth. The big key will be staying out of foul trouble. If we can play some solid D and get a lead, we have a shot. Must stay out of foul trouble so reserves don’t have to play important minutes.

by terp121 on Nov 16, 2011 3:46 PM EST reply actions  

honestly I think we are underestimating our own prowess...we've got Turgeon and our bigs are more than capable here

we will need Stoglin to have a money game on both sides of the court and we will need to hit some threes…I actually expect us to out rebound them but with who they have returning the game should be close

by terpsontop on Nov 16, 2011 4:08 PM EST reply actions  

I agree

I don’t think we are as bad as everyone (including UMD fans) thinks we are.

by terps! on Nov 16, 2011 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

the team chemistry is the swing factor that just might roll our way this year...last year we never found it

individual talents do not always translate into a greater team…we found that out last year and NC State has found that out for many years…we always have a tendency to predict based on individual talent but in the end a good level of both talent and chemistry is needed you can’t have one without the other. I really like what Turge is doing with Stoglin he’s going to be a different player by the end of the year…This year is going to be a lot different not saying we will be at the top of the ACC but you can allready tell we will be better than last year…how high the ceiling is when the other players get back remains to be seen.

by terpsontop on Nov 17, 2011 1:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Anthony Grant

Anthony Grant. That was THE coach Maryland should’ve gunned for. Put VCU on the map and brought them the players that took Shaka on the NCAA run last year, as well as being the main assistant/ recruiter for Billy D. at Florida. Gotta think he would’ve jumped at the opportunity to leave a football school in a football conference for what Maryland has to offer in the DMV. He’s certainly positioned ’Bama quickly.

by Rascal01 on Nov 16, 2011 4:24 PM EST reply actions  

we got turgeon

we have a great coach here who is going to take us back to national prominence. A great X’s and O’s guy who can recruit and plays by the rules. We got what we needed and wanted. It is great to see Turgeon is getting the full support of fan base already…BE THANKFUL

by slim1_1 on Nov 16, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

agreed

I’m completely at ease with the turgeon hiring (biggest fear is he bolts for kansas some day when self leaves). but if you were to ask me who I wanted to replace gary last year I would have said Grant.

by Ttown Funkster on Nov 16, 2011 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Feeling pretty good

Feel like this is the equivalent to when we played MSU (not in the NCAAT) and nobody really felt that good heading into it but we won. My memory is a bit fuzzy around that game but if I recall correctly we really weren’t suppose to win that game. We’re either gonna win and get a big confidence boost or were gonna lose and figure out what went wrong and what we can fix. I see both those things as a positive.

UCLA who?

by terps97 on Nov 16, 2011 4:48 PM EST reply actions  

Agree

I think playing in some of these preseason tournaments is a win-win situation. It gets the team accustomed to playing real opponents off the bat, and if you steal a win against a quality team it serves the tourney resume down the road in a big way.

by terps3 on Nov 16, 2011 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

on thanksgiving?

I remember that game. The mayor had a few clutch three’s if i remember correctly!

by slim1_1 on Nov 16, 2011 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

80-62..we blew them out

MSU was #5 at the time if I recall correctly

by terp121 on Nov 16, 2011 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Thats what I thought.

The whole time I thought they were gonna sneak back up on us but they never did. We need to come out hot against ’Bama if we wanna stay in it.

UCLA who?

by terps97 on Nov 16, 2011 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

You're using a game from 4 years ago?

To give you confidence going into this game? Lol wow. I don’t think ANYBODY who was a part of that team(managers included) are on this team. Totally different situation. If Maryland has a chance to win, it’s not because they beat Michigan State 4 years ago.

by jdwall12 on Nov 16, 2011 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

What he meant

This isn’t even worth responding too but he meant it’s similar in that no one is giving us a chance and we could surprise them.

by terp121 on Nov 16, 2011 8:45 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Lol. Yeah I got that

And my point was that it’s not similar at all because that year, you had a Maryland team coming off a 2nd round NCAA tournament appearance, while returning the majority of their team. I think Gist was the only person that team lost. I understand what he’s saying. I just don’t think it the right way to look at this game.

by jdwall12 on Nov 16, 2011 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry for the confusion

Basically what I was saying was that we tend to surprise teams and I think that this could happen against Bama In no way am I saying we were as good as the team when we played MSU but I’m just saying I think we have a shot because historically we’ve never really been out of it. I remember listening to that game on the radio in disbelief, thinking “are we really upsetting MSU?” and I think that kind of moment could happen this time around too.

UCLA who?

by terps97 on Nov 16, 2011 9:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I understand what you're saying

I think we’re talking about 2 different things. Seems like you’re talking about the set up of the game, while I’m talking about the game itself.

by jdwall12 on Nov 16, 2011 9:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea that is like exactly what I'm saying

Sorry probably came off wrong. I was a bit incoherent on my first comment so it probably didn’t come out how I thought it would. haha once again my lack of posting history has gotten me into miscommunication.

UCLA who?

by terps97 on Nov 16, 2011 9:58 PM EST up reply actions  

SEC

I never really consider an SEC basketball team that starts poorly and finishes strong to be a “head-scratcher.” I just consider them an SEC team that gets hot in the second half of the season mainly because the second half of the season involves playing other SEC teams.

by whodoes on Nov 16, 2011 5:46 PM EST reply actions  

Well, here's how I look at this game...

Theoretically we have a shot, but realistically I think we lose somewhere in the realm of 12 points. This is not to say that we won’t win and pull the upset. If Pankey manages Green, and Stoglin goes off then we could be in good shape. How good this team is, is still up in the air…but this game will tell us a lot.

by nkeninitz on Nov 16, 2011 10:38 PM EST reply actions  

I hope we make it competitive

More interested to see whether our backcourt can handle and score under pressure and whether our front court can hold their own in the paint, particularly in rebounding. Might give us a sense of this team’s ceiling.

by Terpmenacestan on Nov 16, 2011 11:26 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Have to play solid D,

cut down on TOs, hit our FTs, and hit a good %age of our 3s…something a notch below a perfect game for us to win.

by curterp on Nov 16, 2011 11:38 PM EST reply actions  

Let's hope so

His shooting against UNCW was pretty bad, had to be nervous though

by marylandfan23 on Nov 17, 2011 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Think we can win this one

Don’t think we will but I certainly think it’s one they can win. I’d say 73 – 66 Alabama if I had to guess a score. Hopefully free throws aren’t a season-killer the way they were last year.

Is Gary Crowton fired yet?
Is Jerry Angelo fired yet?

by ES46NE10 on Nov 17, 2011 10:13 AM EST reply actions  

Yep

That Villanove game killed me last year

by MurlandTerps on Nov 17, 2011 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Just about to look at the kenpom stats

and kenpom is now a pay site. When the hell did this happen?

by kryptonianjorel on Nov 17, 2011 10:24 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah it's pretty lame

at least we can still see the overall rankings and those categories. We’re #55 and Bama is #22. Only going off our UNCW game data though

by amoskowi on Nov 17, 2011 10:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Pomeroy made the change right before the season

And frankly, I can’t blame him. It’s not like he has advertising on the site. College coaches use it all the time, he should’ve been charging for awhile.

Either pay or use StatSheet, a slightly inferior but still pretty solid service.

by Ben Broman on Nov 17, 2011 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

I luv accessing stat sheet

the officiating stats are one of a kind.

"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."

by bball purist on Nov 17, 2011 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Pomeroy’s explanation.

Frankly, I don’t blame him at all. He has high qualify information that is in demand by people in-the-know. He’s still got a lot of good info available to those of us who don’t want to pay.

by Mike S. on Nov 17, 2011 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't blame him for wanting to make money

but this sucks for those of us who just browse the data out of curiosity. All I really care about is the data on Maryland pre and post game. I find it fascinating, but I can’t justify paying $20 when I’ll only be using a small fraction of the sites content. Kinda like buying a brand new car just to use the cd player

by kryptonianjorel on Nov 17, 2011 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

ESPN website NCAAB

shows three players…none from maryland. No respect, does mention Stoglin in the article though

by marylandfan23 on Nov 17, 2011 12:46 PM EST reply actions  

Jamychal Green scares me to DEATH

Could have declared for the Draft and actually got selected before Jordan Williams…..I think he will expose this front court…

by LargoD85 on Nov 17, 2011 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

Here's what @ballinisahabit thinks

@ballinisahabit
Rob Dauster
So the ACC is the only undefeated league in the country. Untill 7:00 pm, that is. Maryland-Alabama tips at 5:00

"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."

by bball purist on Nov 17, 2011 1:46 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Maryland Terrapins.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

M_small
Diggsmas in May?
Argh_calvin_jpg__small
Big Ten Network makes a profit of $79 million
Terps_kool-aid_small
New 2013 SG - RJ Curington
Maryland_flag_small
Russell Wilson Rule
Md_flag_small
Can We Dance With Aronhalt?
Mar5_mercator_small
Another Maryland B-ball team on "The Bubble"
Small
What does the ACC offer? -from FSU
Small
Newest Terp- Logan Aronhalt
Small
Looks like we got a new FB commit
Small
Miscellaneous musings about sports other than football or men's basketball

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Share This Post


Managers

Testudotimes_small Ben Broman

Authors

Garyland_logo_small Dave Tucker

Mensbasketball-1024_small Ben Goldstein

251084_1429730463099_1227960970_31127493_2195273_n_small Pete Volk