Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Troubled Yankees Join Troubled Red Sox In Last Place

Maryland Minute - 11.15.11 - Debbie Yow Deserves Most of the Blame for Budget Woes

Yow-za.


I've said this for a long time now; Debbie Yow did Maryland wrong with her shady budgeting and then bolted to NC State because she knew her model was unsustainable and that everything would come crashing down. I hope people realize that now.

Maryland athletic cuts only answer to an overdrawn account - The Washington Post
Great piece. Maryland should have never had 27 sports and it wasn't sustainable. This falls on Yow. I've said it multiple times - she left Maryland because the S was about to hit the fan and she knew it. The fact that it was NC State gave her the perfect out and excuse to bolt.

O'Brien out 12 weeks to recover from a broken bone in left arm - baltimoresun.com


"I don't know if he can graduate based on the records I have," Edsall said. "He's very happy here.I have no knowledge of that (O'Brien transferring) happening or anything."

Interesting. Also, Tony Logan is probably your #2 QB now...

Terps Face Alabama in Puerto Rico
Damn...didn't realize Alabama had climbed so high in the rankings. #15/16? Really? Anyway, what I worry most about this game is that they'll be playing so many games in so few days. With our bench as thin as it is, that could spell trouble. It'll be interesting to see how we do against Bama though...

Star-divide

PressBox: Graham's Banner Of Redemption To Fly With Other Terps Greats
Great piece by Keith Mills discussing the road to getting Graham's banner raised in Comcast. Glad this is finally getting done. Here's yet another reason to hate Debbie Yow...

Brown is Terps QB by default | The Daily Times | delmarvanow.com
With DOB out for 12 weeks, Brown is your new starter.

After resounding victory, Frese expects even more from women's basketball - Sports - The Diamondback - University of Maryland
The women's basketball team finally beat Georgetown. Now, Brenda Frese is expecting more from her team.

Comment 77 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Come on, you know she got the gig on looks alone…couldn’t have been her skills

by LowcountryTerp1 on Nov 16, 2011 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Get Well Quick DOB

Looking forward to a better year next season!

by LowcountryTerp1 on Nov 16, 2011 12:01 PM EST reply actions  

Set your calendars for Friday night, November 9, 2012.
Kentucky vs. Maryland in the first basketball game played at the Barclays Center
http://online.wsj.com/article/APb5f260e3d510423da703e2550e6c0112.html

by discuit on Nov 16, 2011 12:04 PM EST reply actions  

If you're going to be a combative douche

You might as well do your research first:

1. The timing of Yow’s departure coincides perfectly with Maryland tapping out its athletic budget. Circumstantial evidence, but fairly damning in its own right.

2. High Ranking Athletic Department Officials have basically said that Yow recognized the approach was unsustainable, but didn’t care.

“I can just tell you – and I’m not throwing anybody under the bus and I’m not trying to make a bad comment – but I think there has long in this industry been a philosophy of ‘Get me through the next 10 years and then it’s somebody else’s problem,’ ” Eaton said. “Things that we’re no longer doing here.” (Statement of Deputy AD Randy Eaton)

3. Furthermore, even Yow admits that she took on a model that could only be sustained by “pushing harder” to “generate new revenue.”

"You can have quality in two different ways," said Debbie Yow, who served as Maryland’s athletic director for 16 years before leaving in June 2010 to take the same position at North Carolina State. "You can cut 10 sports and have quality and just relax, pretty much. Or you can keep all the sports in place and push hard on the staff to continue to generate new revenue. And I will admit to you, that is a burden, that second thing. That’s tough. It wears on you. But that was the model I chose."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/a-closer-look-into-the-finances-of-marylands-athletic-department/2011/07/20/gIQAvsHmQI_story.html

by bshock on Nov 16, 2011 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Does it matter what I tell you then?

If I’m just a “fanblogger” (which should probably be two words, just FYI), will you even care what I respond with? And I’m not just a “fan blogger.” I’m also a credentialed media reporter for DC Sports Box and a writer for Raycom Sports. So please don’t call my credentials into question. There have been several pieces written articulating how Yow’s mismanagement has put Maryland in this position. She constantly withdrew money from a reserve fund to balance the departments budget rather than accepting that the 27 sport program Maryland had wasn’t sustainable. She ignored projected revenue growth that showed continued deficits into the future with the current way of doing business and decided to ignore them. She moved forward with a massive renovation to Tyser tower that added costs that she was told wouldn’t be sustainable unless Maryland football achieved at a level consistent with the 2001-2003 time span. She did the head coach in waiting deal with Franklin. She extended Ralph and gave him a raise that many people questioned. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. She did even more, according to sources I have. She took a sinking ship, set it on fire, and jumped overboard to swim away to NC State.

But what do I know. I’m just a “fanblogger”

by Dave Tucker on Nov 16, 2011 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Dave,

If she admitted that the program was sustainable while still here, how come no one put a stop to her methods? Just seems crazy that UMD let this happen.

by Terpnation on Nov 16, 2011 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

That's a great question

The answer I’ve heard is that Mote didn’t care. And she used some fuzzy math to make it appear things were A okay.

by Dave Tucker on Nov 16, 2011 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

not even close tucker—

She took a sinking ship, set it on fire, PACKED dynamite in the hull, STABBED the captain, SCUTTLED the life boats, told EVERYone to get a good night’s sleep, AND THEN jumped overboard to swim away to NC State.

lucky the nc state game is away or i’d be there. we need to get a rabid fan section going for the 2012 nc state game.

by space_ on Nov 16, 2011 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

bobsaget must be related to Debbie Yow

She was objectively awful and bshock and dave tucker told you 17 reasons why in under 20 minutes.

You got served bobsaget! And by a “fanblogger” whose opinion you don’t respect. Boy, I’d feel pretty lousy about myself if I were you…

by terpapins on Nov 16, 2011 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Also

Why don’t you actually read the article linked to what I wrote in regard to Yow. It’s in the Washington Post, so for you that means it must be correct, despite the fact that they still employ Steve Yanda…

by Dave Tucker on Nov 16, 2011 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

The column?

Opinion. A good column, but still just that.

by bobsaget on Nov 16, 2011 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Have you even read the report?

I can only assume not, otherwise you wouldn’t be asking such uninformed questions. Please, give this a read and let me know how you can come to any other conclusion based on the hard data. This is Yow’s fault.

Also, your comment above was obnoxious as f***.

by Mike S. on Nov 16, 2011 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I've read the report. Throughly.

Nowhere does it talk about Yow making bad decisions. Where does it blame Yow?

by bobsaget on Nov 16, 2011 11:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm confused...

Are you arguing semantics, or are you just completely unwilling to read between the lines? If it’s semantics – no, the report does not specifically mention Yow, as it doesn’t specifically list anyone. But surely we can assume that, despite the fact no one is listed by name, someone is still to blame for this mess.

But if you’re just unwilling to see what’s going on here, let me first direct you to bshock’s comment above that you neglected to address, as he pretty clearly lays out the argument. Let’s look at what the report actually says:

As a result, ICA’s expenditures have exceeded its revenues. For several years, the annual operating budget (including facility debt obligations) has been balanced with transfers from ICA’s accumulated fund balance (or “reserves”). Reserves are normally used for purposes such as these transfers. The ICA reserves are now depleted and transfers are no longer available to support the deficit. The budget shortfalls will grow in the coming years if the finances and operations of ICA are not changed.

So let’s put this in simple terms. Yow was operating the athletic department in the red for the last decade, but was able to “hide” this fact using creative accounting practices. She crafted the athletic department into a wholly unsustainable enterprise that was only kept afloat by a reserve of surplus funds accumulated in the early 2000s. But perhaps more importantly, she had no plans on how to operate the department once these funds were depleted.

Personally, I would consider this poor decision making, and the blame falls squarely on Yow’s head. Then again, I’m starting to get the feeling that you’re just being obstinate and trollish.

by Mike S. on Nov 17, 2011 8:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Yow was "CEO" of athletics

If she isn’t responsible for the mess, who is? The fans who don’t go to football games? The alums who don’t open their wallets?

by Runningcloud on Nov 17, 2011 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Frankly, I don’t even disagree that Yow may be at fault. I just don’t think you supplied the necessary links to back that up in this post. A column that blames Debbie Yow is hardly enough to support your statement.

by bobsaget on Nov 16, 2011 11:58 PM EST up reply actions  

First, you're wrong as detailed in other replies to this post. Second,

Yow is well on her way to alienating many of the NC State boosters here in Raleigh. I recently had lunch with a significant NCSU booster. I mentioned that I was a Maryland grad, which prompted him to go on a 20 minute rant about Yow. He stated that it seems like she intentionally is trying alienate many of the major contributors to the athletic department. He said she her basic fundraising approach is “give us your money and shut the F up.” Now, I can understand not wanting major boosters to think that they are an assistant coach, but her abrasive personality coupled with a continued “give us your money, but don’t ask for any accounting/accountability as to where it goes” is beginning to wear thin on many at NCSU.

by RaleighTerp on Nov 16, 2011 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Everyone else has done a great job of rebutting this

But my one thing: if you consider all of us “just fanbloggers” and don’t respect us, why are you here?

by Ben Broman on Nov 16, 2011 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Whoops

Obviously trolling, let him get bored and move on

by Womp Womp on Nov 17, 2011 12:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Going on a Maryland sports blog

to say you like laughing at how out of touch maryland fans are with their program is a pretty textbook example of trolling.

I hope for your sake that you are doing it on purpose and you aren’t this douchey in real life

by Womp Womp on Nov 17, 2011 11:26 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Seriously

I can’t respect the opinion of anybody who’d pick bobsaget as a username.

by rsdk on Nov 16, 2011 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Has Debbie Yow...

given any statements on the current financial situation at UMD? Or have any reporters asked for comment?

Another thing to think about in this whole debacle is not just the cost of Comcast and Byrd but she also poured a ton of money in new softball, field hockey, and baseball facilities. None of which were cheap and certainly don’t have the potential ROI as Byrd and/or Comcast.

by TerpBaxter on Nov 16, 2011 12:46 PM EST reply actions  

No, and yes.

I’ll look for the actual article again, but there was a line from Yow along the lines of “it wouldn’t be appropriate for me to comment since I’m no longer the AD at Maryland.”

by Mike S. on Nov 16, 2011 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

totally bro

boner central right here.

HELLO HELLO MR WILPON... BUY THAT MANSION. WE DONT NEED A CONDO.

by kendynamo on Nov 16, 2011 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I threw up some in my mouth when i saw that picture...

clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose!
smoke'em if ya got'em!

by Daniel Hamilton on Nov 16, 2011 3:43 PM EST reply actions  

A couple of thoughts about athletic department revenues and expenditures, and Kevin Anderson

First, every athletic department annual budget and expenditure should be reviewed by the university office of financial affairs. Randy Eaton cannot do that job since he works for the AD. It places him in an untenable position. Second, we should have minimal compliance with Title IX. To continue to do more is a political decision that adversly affects all other university teams given the current financial situation. If university or state political interests want to do more, they should obtain the necessary State funding.

I think blaming Kevin for our current situation is misguided at best. He isn’t responsible for the the largest parts of the budget shortfall. He inherited them. I think the basketball program is the best test of his abilities as AD. I think he and Gary put together the short list of coaching candidates. Kevin did the interviews and hired Mark. He then made the case for hiring Dalonte. Given the current budget situation, I am sure he had to battle entrenched campus interests to pay what was needed to get him. So far the decisions look good. The determining factor will be improvements in season ticket sales and other basketball revenue streams. If the program is successful, both Kevin and Mark should receive credit.

As to football, Kevin is ultimately responsible for the hiring of Randy. However, I don’t think that his hiring is as good an indicator as his hiring of Mark. Whether Randy is successful or not, he was selected as an option by a search committee. We also don’t know what money was available for hiring a new coach and assistants. Its likely we’re on the low end of pay scale. Furthermore, I agree with others that wrote that Leach was Kevin’s first choice. So, I don’t know how much credit Kevin should get if Randy is sucessful nor how much Kevin should be blamed if he isn’t.

by wmterp on Nov 16, 2011 5:29 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

This pandering to the...

…“it’s Debbie Yow’s fault” crowd is weak.

Major, major expenditures were planned (renovations bo Byrd, Comcast, etc…) because Debbie Yow, along with the rest of us, thought we were on the verge of big things. The basketball program was humming right along in the late nineties and early 2001’s. The football program looked like it had an elite coach in Ralph Friedgen (Orange Bowl, remember that?) and we all wanted to go big time with the football thing. Money was spent. And then, plain and simple, our basketball and football programs immediately became mediocre in the in the aftermath of those expenditures. So, after major expenditures, our revenues SHRANK.

Stop blaming Yow. Maryland fans are starting to sound like Barrack Obama blaming Bush. It’s not becoming.

* Maryland basketball has been a sleeping Giant. The Giant is waking up.
** It goes without saying, that if Maryland basketball was a sleeping Giant, whoever was at the helm before, put it to sleep.

by CharlesDriesell on Nov 16, 2011 6:43 PM EST reply actions  

But it was

Bush’s fault.

by rsdk on Nov 16, 2011 10:51 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Bush made Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac...

give out all that mortage loan money to low income households? Bush made them all go default? Bush had Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae bundle all them bad loans together, and had the government back them? And Bush made it so that almost collapsed the entire world economy? Wow! I thought it was Barnie Frank and gang who pushed hard for all that to take place.

* Maryland basketball has been a sleeping Giant. The Giant is waking up.
** It goes without saying, that if Maryland basketball was a sleeping Giant, whoever was at the helm before, put it to sleep.

by CharlesDriesell on Nov 17, 2011 12:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Well you could argue Bush promoted policies which made it profitable for such loans to be made....

But, then again, you can’t blame those policies solely on Bush. And am I missing something? When did Obama publicly blame Bush?

How did you get me talking about politics on a sports blog?

by Womp Womp on Nov 17, 2011 12:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Are you kidding?

When did Obama blame Bush? Publically? In nearly a hundred speeches, he’s blamed Bush.

The economic downturn was due to twenty years of bad policy. Every Congress, and every presidency in the past twenty years can take some of the blame.

Now of course, during elections politicians make promises to fix things. If those things aren’t fixed on their watch, does that mean they broke their promises?

* Maryland basketball has been a sleeping Giant. The Giant is waking up.
** It goes without saying, that if Maryland basketball was a sleeping Giant, whoever was at the helm before, put it to sleep.

by CharlesDriesell on Nov 17, 2011 1:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Well wait a minute

Are you saying he said, “It’s Bush’s fault that we are in trouble now,” or are you saying he said, “The past 10 years we’ve been fighting 2 wars, blah blah blah, and that’s why we are in trouble now.” Those are not the same thing.

by Womp Womp on Nov 17, 2011 1:28 AM EST up reply actions  

He has used a variety of ways...

of blaming Bush. He said the “previous administration” put us in worse condition than we knew. Which is strange, because we knew the entire economy almost collapsed in 2008. Which is also strange, because his “solutions” haven’t worked, so why blame on what caused the problems? Even if he is right? If your solutions didn’t work? As in spending a trillion dollars and getting nothing to show for it? As in gas prices being twice what they were when he took office? The blame game is getting real old. Democrats held congress for the two years before Obama took office, and two years after he took office. That’s four years of Democratic Control of Congress, during the critical period.

* Maryland basketball has been a sleeping Giant. The Giant is waking up.
** It goes without saying, that if Maryland basketball was a sleeping Giant, whoever was at the helm before, put it to sleep.

by CharlesDriesell on Nov 17, 2011 1:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Didn't really want to debate politics

I just wanted to make sure I wasn’t ignorant of some speech where Obama completely lost it and started cursing Bush’s name

by Womp Womp on Nov 17, 2011 1:51 AM EST up reply actions  

What I'm saying is

There’s a difference between blaming Bush and regurgitating Democrat talking points. If you are going to get worked up about party talking points, then you have to do it both ways. Every president of recent memory has criticized past administrations. Saying the past administration didn’t do anything wrong is a terrible way to win votes. That’s happening with the current Republican candidates talking about Obama, it happened with Obama talking about Bush, Bush to Clinton, Clinton to Bush. It goes both ways

by Womp Womp on Nov 17, 2011 1:41 AM EST up reply actions  

One question, Charlie

Where are the effing WMDs? Over 700 billion dollars spent in Iraq, over 4 thousand American lives lost, over 32,000 wounded; and not one WMD to show for it.

by rsdk on Nov 17, 2011 7:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, IraQ is only one letter away from IraN

Maybe Bush got confused looking at a map.

"Complacency is your demise." - Kerry King

by duck on Nov 17, 2011 8:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Ask Bill Clinton.

He claimed they had WMD’s while he was still president, using the same “intelligence”.

by 1 proud terp on Nov 17, 2011 9:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha, love that argument

Did Clinton invade Iraq over it? Doesn’t matter who believed Iraq had WMDs based on that faulty intelligence, Bush invaded Iraq instead of waiting for UN arms inspectors, who had been given the unconditional go-ahead by the Iraqis. See above regarding the consequences. And then there was the fiscal devastation wreaked by a second war. Where does the buck stop, O proud one? Not with the Dems here. And for the record, I’m not a Dem (but neither am I a GOP’er).

by rsdk on Nov 18, 2011 6:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Just stating the facts, son.

How bout this, Clinton had Osama bin laden offered up on a silver platter by Sudan BEFORE 9/11 went down, and he didn’t take him(out). How much $$$ would THAT have saved us? Doesn’t matter, everything will always be Bush’s fault for ever. Thankfully, Obama has been flawless, and me and my unemployed wife with a Master’s degree thank him.

by 1 proud terp on Nov 18, 2011 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Stating the facts, pops?

Maybe try reading the report of the 9/11 Commission, which denies that Sudan ever made the offer. Or how about this: it didn’t matter anyway because, at the time, America had nothing to charge bin Laden with. There was no evidence back then (in 1996) that bin Laden had harmed any Americans.

Not to defend Clinton, because security lapses that allowed 9/11 to happen occurred under both his and Bush’s administrations. The Afghanistan war was then inevitable. But the Iraqi war? It didn’t have to be. Over 4000 American lives lost, over 32,000 wounded, the American economy tanking over the weight of 2 wars.

You can continue to worship Bush as a god if you like, even though his actions are likely the reason your unemployed wife can’t find a job. But to me, he was the biggest imbecile ever appointed to the Presidency.

by rsdk on Nov 18, 2011 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Clinton implicitly admitted that he was offered Bin Laden

via a CIA official, but refused to take him because he didn’t think he had enough to indict him, even though he knew OBL wanted to do harm to the U.S. Isn’t a conspiracy to commit a crime, a crime in itself? That said, he should have just bombed him from 10,000 ft., killed him without trial or conviction, with collateral damage be-damned. Just the way Obama is prosecuting the war, without a peep from the hypocritical left. It’s funny how Bush got criticized at every turn from the media and the democratic ‘loyal opposition’, during his tenure(and still to this day), while Obama has upped the ante and is killing foreigners at a more rapid and effective clip. Where’s Code Pink these days?? Where’s Cindy Sheehan?? Where’s the morally outraged media?? Crickets…

I’ve got my own issues with Bush, I worship no man(except Gary Williams), and I’ll admit he had his share of failures. I think his father should have gone to Baghdad and taken Hussein out during the first Gulf War. But revisionist history is easy to view with hindsight. GW Bush made the decision to confront Saddam after his continual shell-games with the UN weapon inspectors. And despite the feckless sanctions imposed by the corrupt and anti-American UN, Saddam continued to not cooperate. Add into the fact that Saddam made an attempt to assassinate our former President(GHWBush) which is an act of war, GW made his decision.

As for the 4000 lives lost, and 32,000 wounded, I’m disgusted that anybody had to die or be wounded in this effort. I have several friends that have spent many years in both Afghanistan and Iraq during this war, and they have sacrificed more than you or I probably ever will. But to blame Bush solely for this, and not mention our enemies who have killed/wounded them, is being fairly obtuse. Perhaps if our soldiers were allowed to fight without one hand tied behind their backs, because of a ridiculously hampering ‘rules of engagement’ meant to appease an anti-Bush media looking to exploit collateral damage at every turn, perhaps this war could have been prosecuted much quicker with much less casualty.

As for the economy, the weight of two wars did not cause the economy to tank. Historically, wars are good for the economy. What’s different about this one? 50 years of failed liberal policies that have made America less and less competitive around the world, and a ‘loyal opposition’ that actively routed for our failure under Bush. From education to our energy policies, we are failing. We’ve become the entitlement society. We believe we are entitled to the good life, just because we were born(or immigrated) here. The farther we fall from self-reliance to government dependence, the worse off we will continue to get.

BTW, I’m not a GOP’er, either. I think there are plenty of douchebag republicans in our government(and in the presidential race). I’m a conservaterian, I like the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Every one is free to live their life the way they choose, as long as it doesn’t infringe on the rights of others.

by 1 proud terp on Nov 19, 2011 9:56 AM EST up reply actions  

This is ballooning

and you’re coming across to me as a bit of a crazed anarchist. Before you start hunting me down with your club, I’ll stop and let you have the last word.

by rsdk on Nov 19, 2011 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough.

More like a crazed constitutionalist, anarchy doesn’t work. In any case, I appreciate the debate, let’s part as friends. I’m not into flame wars. Enjoy the game today, go Terps.

by 1 proud terp on Nov 19, 2011 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll ask the mods first

Is it OK if I take the time to refute him point by point, or should we just let it go?

"Complacency is your demise." - Kerry King

by duck on Nov 17, 2011 8:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm confused as to what your point is

I don’t see what successes in 2001 have to do with Yow’s actions later in the decade.

Also, I don’t think anyone is blaming our budget problems on the building of Comcast. That project predates our budget problems by a decade. The rennovations to Byrd happened much later. While I still think this project was ill-advised, it was still somewhat defensible since Yow couldn’t have predicted the economic downturn and coinciding dropping attendance figures when the project began.

What Yow is guilty of is not readjusting her expectations. By 2005 (earlier, really), our revenue sports both came back down to Earth and she continued to operate the bloated athletic department as if nothing was wrong. She used up our reserve budget and then jumped ship. Whether or not the former fact led to the latter is admittedly, conjecture, but at best, it’s very fishy. I’m not sure how the budget problems can’t be blamed on Yow. If they weren’t her fault, then whose fault was it?

by Womp Womp on Nov 17, 2011 12:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Later in the decade...

Successes in 2001 were the reason renovations were planned. You just don’t put together renovation packages over night. They take a few years to put together. We built Comcast. We renovated Byrd Stadium. And these were multi-year expenditures, that took a multiple of years to plan, and a multiple of years to complete. And all was based on supposed continued success of both the football program and basketball program.

As for not “readjusting” expectations, it wasn’t until 2004 or 2005 that the downturn in those two programs was really evident. By that time, the dye was already cast. ComCast Center was built, and all renovations to Byrd were either paid for, or planned for construction. And who knew how far down both of those programs would go.

Just as you can blame Debbie Yow, I can blame Ralph Friedgen and Gary Williams for taking our two revenue sports into the toilet.

* Maryland basketball has been a sleeping Giant. The Giant is waking up.
** It goes without saying, that if Maryland basketball was a sleeping Giant, whoever was at the helm before, put it to sleep.

by CharlesDriesell on Nov 17, 2011 1:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Just because its planned doesn't mean you have to go through with the project

And the athletic department’s problems go waaaaay deeper than Comcast Center and Byrd. The most discussed of these problems was maintaining 27 sports. There is no reason why Yow shouldn’t have realized by 2004-2005 that the 27 sport model wasn’t going to work. Instead, she did nothing.

I also don’t buy the “things were going well and then they weren’t so it can’t be Yow’s fault” argument. She took a risk by investing so much money. That risk didn’t work out for the department, so she should get the lion’s share of the blame.

As for the Friedgen and Williams not doing well argument. She hired and then gave a lucrative extension to Friedgen. Then made a messy coach-in-waiting deal with Franklin, which forced KA’s hand last year and cost us a good amount in buyout money. So a good amount of blame goes to her as well. As for Gary….well we won’t go into that since that could become a novel’s worth of arguing, so I’ll concede Gary. But basketball isn’t the main revenue source of the athletic department anyway, football is. And basketball ticket sales still rank in the top 20 (If I’m remembering correctly) in the country (Yes, thanks to Comcast. Yow gets points for this). Lagging basketball tickets sales are more of a secondary contributor to our debt accumulation.

Bottom line is, Yow was at the helm when the majority of the damage was done. She has to receive the blame.

by Womp Womp on Nov 17, 2011 1:25 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Terp fans were in denial...

all the way up to Ralph’s 2-10 season. It was at that point that we all realized he wasn’t an elite coach, and he would never take us to the Orange (or similar) bowl again. Until that time, we still thought he might ressurrect the program. Which he really didn’t.

* Maryland basketball has been a sleeping Giant. The Giant is waking up.
** It goes without saying, that if Maryland basketball was a sleeping Giant, whoever was at the helm before, put it to sleep.

by CharlesDriesell on Nov 17, 2011 1:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough

but it’s the fans’ jobs to be overly optimistic. It’s the AD’s job to make sound financial decisions. She took some pretty extreme financial risks w/o taking any measures to mitigate those risks (by reducing the number of sports, for example).

by Womp Womp on Nov 17, 2011 1:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Unfortunately...

I’d have to say I wanted the renovations. The argument has always been, with better facilities, we get better recruits, and we have a more successful program. And Ralph pushed hard for the renovations, using this exact argument. Problem was, he didn’t get better players after the renovations.

* Maryland basketball has been a sleeping Giant. The Giant is waking up.
** It goes without saying, that if Maryland basketball was a sleeping Giant, whoever was at the helm before, put it to sleep.

by CharlesDriesell on Nov 17, 2011 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

I think we're vastly underestimating what the Tyser Tower expanison did to our AD budget....

Seriously, did anyone at the time think this was a good idea? I remember hearing about the expansion and telling my friends, “That’s about the dumbest idea I’ve ever heard. They can’t fill what they have now!”

"Complacency is your demise." - Kerry King

by duck on Nov 17, 2011 8:30 AM EST up reply actions  

I thought it was a good idea...

mainly for the reason the old Tyser Tower was horrific. The argument has always been, if you have better facilities, you can attract better recruits, and thus have a stronger team. This is the argument Ralph made when he pushed hard for the renovations. And I admit, I was in favor of anything that would improve facilities. On the other hand, I ALSO wanted it to attract better players, and to have a more successful program. Which didn’t happen.

* Maryland basketball has been a sleeping Giant. The Giant is waking up.
** It goes without saying, that if Maryland basketball was a sleeping Giant, whoever was at the helm before, put it to sleep.

by CharlesDriesell on Nov 17, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Wrong about Byrd, Chuck.

From the report:

Also, the Commission acknowledges that the limited leasing of suites in Byrd Stadium has added to the budget shortfall. Although ICA downsized the full renovation of Byrd Stadium originally proposed in 2004, it was agreed to build the suites in order to increase revenues.

The die was not already cast as you claim.

by Mike S. on Nov 17, 2011 8:46 AM EST up reply actions  

The main thing to take from this quote...

was that after 2004 revenues shrank. We had expected to be competing for Orange Bowls and such because Ralph got such a strong start out of the box. We literally thought we had an elite coach on our hands, and filling the stadium would be no problem. That did not happen.

Chain of events: We think we have elite coach, so we spend money to expand. For some unexplainable reason, our coach becomes average/mediocre and we have trouble filling the stadium as always. Money spent, but no increase (but actually decreasing) fan support because of mediocre seasons.

Really, the renovations came because we (and me too) thought we had entered a new era of Terp football, but in reality, not quite the era we hoped for.

* Maryland basketball has been a sleeping Giant. The Giant is waking up.
** It goes without saying, that if Maryland basketball was a sleeping Giant, whoever was at the helm before, put it to sleep.

by CharlesDriesell on Nov 17, 2011 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

"the dye was already cast"

Is that why Yow’s hair looks so bad?

"A new era has dawned in Maryland Athletics..."

by bball purist on Nov 17, 2011 3:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Debbie Yow as a victim? I don't think so.

She reported directly to Dr. Mote and apparently had minimal oversight. She is responsible for the expansion to 27 teams. I also believe she made the case for the addition of suites at Byrd using her projections. True, those projections were reviewed by other departments. Furthermore, there are administrators that pushed to have the expansion to 27 teams because of their own political agendas. So, there is blame to go around. However, Debbie Yow deserves a large share of that blame.

by wmterp on Nov 17, 2011 5:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Maryland Terrapins.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

M_small
Diggsmas in May?
Argh_calvin_jpg__small
Big Ten Network makes a profit of $79 million
Terps_kool-aid_small
New 2013 SG - RJ Curington
Maryland_flag_small
Russell Wilson Rule
Md_flag_small
Can We Dance With Aronhalt?
Mar5_mercator_small
Another Maryland B-ball team on "The Bubble"
Small
What does the ACC offer? -from FSU
Small
Newest Terp- Logan Aronhalt
Small
Looks like we got a new FB commit
Small
Miscellaneous musings about sports other than football or men's basketball

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Share This Post


Managers

Testudotimes_small Ben Broman

Authors

Garyland_logo_small Dave Tucker

Mensbasketball-1024_small Ben Goldstein

251084_1429730463099_1227960970_31127493_2195273_n_small Pete Volk