Time to Reflect: Is Maryland-Navy Set to Become a Full-Time Rivalry?
by Ben Broman on Sep 7, 2010 6:57 PM EDT
in Football
Email
PrintLeading up to Maryland's opener against Navy, the majority of previews focused on the fact that this was a "rivalry renewed"; there were pieces about how big Maryland-Navy could've been, looking back on the past, and just about any sort of nostalgia you could care about.
Along with that came the movement toward making Terps-Middies a regular affair. First came Ralph Friedgen and Ken Niumatalolo; then the ADs at both schools said they'd be receptive to playing more. Even a Ravens exec pitched in with an idea that sounded rather amazing: an annual season opener between the teams in Baltimore for a "Governor's Cup" trophy, preceded by a weekend of concerts, parades, other events and the requisite college recruiting, all in Maryland's largest metropolis.
Some, like me, think it's a good idea and that the two schools need to figure out how to get this going on more stable basis. Others, like Navy blog The Birddog, think that Maryland and Navy really won't work anything but a very semi-regular basis. And I'm sure there are a few of you that are hoping that Maryland and Navy just never meet again.
Then, of course, Maryland hired former Army AD Kevin Armstrong as their new head man. If the past is any indication, he has at least a working relationship with Navy AD Chet Gladchuk (which would be a step up from the Yow era in that area) and a probable desire to continue to play his former primary nemesis. He's said he'd like to see more Navy games, and I doubt it's pandering; no one should be surprised if this a serious issue he pursues.
But with the game in hindsight, we can start to grade how it was as an "event", and just how much the two should play in the future.
First off, it's safe to say that attendance was exactly what everyone involved with the game wanted. The announced attendance was 69,348, which was less than 2,000 seats short of filling M&T Bank's 71,000 capacity. It's also more than Byrd Stadium could hold, and it's worth mentioning that Maryland is coming off a 2-10 season with a relative apathy surrounding football. If Maryland was, say, 9-4 last year, this game is a sell-out and almost entirely full.
As for the atmosphere, I'll be honest: I was at home, and didn't really get a shot to gauge it. Reports from the game have been conflicting. But it seemed electric, at least on TV. Sure, it took awhile to get going, but for how boring of a game that was at times, the fans on both sides stayed active and in the game, and occasionally got loud for a few third downs.
Now, was it an "archrival" atmosphere? No, not really. It's not Army-Navy or Maryland-Duke (in basketball) and the respect between the two seemed very real, but there were a few moments of intensity (the big third downs, Travis Baltz getting froggy after a monster punt). Besides, Maryland-Navy will never be a big-time rivalry alongside the likes of Army-Navy, but that doesn't mean they can't open the season every year and be a solid secondary rivalry.
The factor most in favor of Maryland and Navy starting up a true rivalry comes from just how good these games have been. The first one, in 2005, was Lance Ball's coming out party. This one was straight out of a movie. Both teams should remain fairly competitive in the future, with Navy solidifying themselves as a high-major and Maryland seemingly on the right track (or on it soon, if Friedgen doesn't work out).
There are some problems, mainly coming from scheduling. Maryland has Notre Dame in FedEx Field next year and Texas on the docket in the future (albeit well in the future), plus a newly renewed continuous home-and-home with West Virginia. Navy has the very obvious series with Army, Air Force, and Notre Dame, plus SMU now annually on the schedule. Maryland, for one, would do well to schedule at least two easy games per year for bowl reasons like most teams do, and that wouldn't be an option in the Notre Dame and Texas years unless the Terps dropped West Virginia.
Not to mention that a loss to Navy never looks good, while a win won't always be chalked up as a huge achievement, either. In terms of rankings, this is akin to Virginia beating Oklahoma State, and you'd think that would get a little more national attention than the Terps have. It's not quite a lose-lose in terms of results, but it's not a win-win.
On the other hand, the benefits are tough to pass up. An annual/semi-annual rivalry would serve as glorified advertisements for both universities that entire weekend, would provide more ticket sales than either team would be able to attract independently, and provides a semi-marquee game for some national attention.
The atmosphere, ticket sales, and entertainment level of the game probably points to a renewal of the series in a few years. But that's really all pointless anyway once Anderson enters the picture. Quite simply, I'd be a little surprised if it doesn't happen, and from where I stand, that's a good thing.
Of course, the fact that Maryland won probably has a lot to do with that. But how do you see it? Should Maryland-Navy be a season-opener on a regular basis? Or does it just not make sense to face that triple-option.
8 comments
|
Do you like this story?
Comments
I voted Every Year...
but you’re probably right, if we would have lost, I would be saying “Never Again”. Bottom line, I think it’s an overall net positive to have a close by “rival”. And I really like the idea of the weekend parade and celebration. And who knows, maybe Navy will become a more prominent program soon, and drop the triple option for a pro-style. The triple opt. is the only reason I would hesitate against the “Every Year” vote. But what are we complaining about? Notre Dame never bitches about it, and they play ’em every year.
Annual game in Baltimore
I was in the student section yesterday and the atmosphere was great for the game, the students were much more into the game than any game from last season. The tailgating scene was really cool to see, and if Maryland were a ranked team, the stadium would’ve been at capacity around 71,000 instead of having a few thousand empty seats in the upper deck. Overall, the event had to be considered a success for both schools and the state/city of Baltimore. The national TV audience didn’t hurt either. This rivalry doesn’t have the pure hatred of a West Virginia football or Duke basketball game, simply because you can’t really say anything bad about an instiution that sends its kids to war for this country. But it is a good, friendly in-state rivalry that could catch on with fans if both teams are competitive. Even if we can’t get an annual agreement with Navy, I do think Maryland should try and play one game a year in Baltimore. The fact remains that more UMD fans and alumni live in the surrounding counties of Baltimore than around DC, and are much more willing to come to Baltimore to see a game in a beautiful stadium than travel through traffic of both cities and be at an average stadium. If a nonconference game against a BCS-level opponent was played in Baltimore each year, I think it would be a win-win for both the city and the university to make the state’s flagship university more accessible to the majority of its fanbase.
I want it every year
In Baltimore, on labor day, and name it something cool like the Labor Day Classic. Or like the “Crabcakes and Football” game. Have it replace WVU, because we are clearly no longer on their level.
Absolutely correct-If it wasn't a big deal why was Nick Faust there?
You were obviously at the game. No one who was there questions the validity of how fun this event was.
Everyone here is missing the point of what this game could be-a big deal. Every kid who ever plays HS football in Texas wants to be a Longhorn. If this was to turn into “something” like MarylandPride is saying, maybe people would have some pride in “Maryland football” and not see it as their third choice behind A) anyone from the SEC or Big 12 or B) Penn State.
Maryland vs Navy, West Viriginia, and UVA makes someone say “I want to be a part of that” and maybe overlook some of Maryland’s weaker points. Having the game in Baltimore was a terrific idea and the enery before and during was absolutely great. It was really loud and everyone was psyched pregame. Good job Maryland athletic department this was great. Ben you missed a hell of a good time man.
Dealing with the option is a huge plus!
Win or lose, we have to play Ga Tech every so often and their option is much better, I would think seeing it early would be useful
We should have a B-more game every year but it doesn't have to be Navy.
I’d rather play ND and Texas at there if we could.
I say every 2 or 3 years
I just don’t see it ever being a great “rivalry.” I was at the 2005 game as a Maryland student, but just don’t quite see it. Here are a few reasons why I don’t see this becoming anywhere close to the best rivalry games in college football. First, we don’t recruit against them. Second, Navy fans aren’t just Marylanders. In fact, I’d go out on a limb and say the vast majority of Navy fans aren’t from Maryland. Without that geographic turf war for fans and recruits, I just don’t see it. Third, if this was done every year, it would lose something. Students would stop making the trip up to Baltimore after going once or twice (besides, tailgating is infinitely better when you don’t have to drive home). It would cease to be a “special occasion”. If it was every 2 or 3 years, and held in Baltimore, I think it could be pretty exciting—the Ravens executive pretty much nailed it.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.