As Maryland Enters the NCAA Tournament, Media Begins Swirling
It's March, and that means its time for perceived and real media slights to set in. They're what Gary Williams thrives on, his very lifeblood. And boy, are they plentiful. I hate to seem like I'm whining about the media, but honestly I have nothing better to do and there's an ample amount of hate to go around this time of year.
After Steve Yanda went out and wrote a piece on Moses Abraham's recruitment - implying that Gary Williams is a poor recruiter in the process - he comes back two days later bringing up good ol' graduation statistics.
Maryland knows that it's graduation statistics from the turn of the century period are poor. It's been pored over...and over...and over. They hadn't been brought up recently, though, which was encouraging, and Maryland had been improving in this regard. Just when you think you're out, though, they pull you back in.
Maryland had the lowest graduation rate -- 8 percent -- among the 65 teams in this year's NCAA basketball tournament, according to an annual study released Monday by the Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport at the University of Central Florida. The Institute focused its study on an increase in the disparity in graduation rates between white and black players on tournament teams, but the rankings brought unflattering attention on Maryland.
Terrapins Coach Gary Williams disputed the significance of the figures, which assessed the classes that entered college from 1999 to 2002 and their success in graduating within six years.
Citing ten year old stats? Well, that sure is relevant. Cue Gary Williams:
"Obviously, those years we had players leave early and they're millionaires now, and they're coming back to get their degrees, just like other guys have come back and gotten their degrees," Williams said Monday in a phone interview. "Plus we've graduated, let's see, I think it's 10 out of 12 and most recently of our seniors, we'll graduate all four of our seniors this year. Our academic support system has completely changed since 1999-2003. That is ancient facts, and you know it.
"See, you'll never put in there that our four seniors will graduate this year or that we've graduated 10 out of our last 12 players. That's my quote. And our academic support system is completely different than it was '99 to 2003. You're talking about eight years ago, seven years ago where things were different.
...
"Once again, we've graduated 10 of our last 12, we have four seniors this year, and they will graduate. I will put that graduation rate for the last five years up against anyone in the country."
I'm not going to single out Yanda here, because the article itself is pretty fair and gives plenty of time for Gary to talk angrily, but who exactly thought this was newsworthy? "Oh, ten year old statistics that have been recited hundreds of times before indicting Maryland....again? Sounds great, let's run it." I'm not a journalist by trade, but I definitely remember some of the key rules of newsworthy stories, and these break them.
The idea of the report wasn't to figure out the worst at graduating, but instead the disparity between black and white athlete graduation rates. The AP ran a story on it, and shockingly focused on the goal of the report - not a mention of Maryland.
Can we please just drop this? Doesn't everyone know the facts by now, and that they're improving? Good.
Onward and upwards. Or downwards.
After Gregg Doyel went on a slightly facetious but mostly serious rampage about the Terps, his CBS colleague (again, we're semi-partners with CBS) Jon Rothstein decided it was his turn to hate on the Terps (thanks to aMo for the heads up):
Rothstein [on how difficult a matchup Houston will be]: Well it's very difficult. Because they're a team in Houston that has momentum, and momentum is a very funny thing in the NCAA tournament. But you look at this year's Maryland team, and they're vintage Maryland. They have one pretty good guard, and a couple other ancillary parts, and they kind of piece things together from there. So it's typical Maryland, Gary. They have one big win and they'll lose in the second round.
Did I miss something somewhere? This isn't the mohawk-ed Doyel - Rothstein is a smart guy, and is paid to be an analyst, not a rabble-rouser. I don't see any analysis there - despite only have "one pretty good guard", three other players average double digits, and a fourth averages nine points and eight boards. And I also happened to miss when Clemson and Florida State in Tallahassee became negligible. Maybe I should expect less; he clearly doesn't listen very well, and then doesn't make sense:
Gary Parrish: How far can Maryland go? I don't know. They finished second in the ACC, they're clearly a good team, better than most anticipated. But I still think that from a talent perspective, how good are they? I don't think this is an Elite Eight team, a Final Four team, but are they good enough to get past Houston? Yeah, I think just about anybody is.
Rothstein: Elite Eight, Final Four for Maryland? You're being generous there.
Parrish: No, I said that wouldn't happen.
Rothstein: Yeah, but even in the same sentence.
You're right. We should be barred from using a term when we're saying it won't happen. "Maryland won't....you know." Oh, and one more piece:
Rothstein: You know, it's really funny. I said earlier on a radio interview that I don't care who Michigan State is playing, I'm not touching them with a ten foot pole. And I looked at the bracket, and I'm gonna have them in the Sweet 16.
So, uh, Maryland's the worst team in the tournament then? Did them being in the tournament surprise you? Sure, Jon.
All this on the heels of being called overrated heading into the tournament.
This is the perfect time for newspapers to run these types of pieces, and of course with so many talking heads on TV at least one guy is going to say something like Rothstein. But they do their best when disrespected - maybe there's no better timing for the Terps for this type of stuff. The last time they were under this much pressure? Probably UNC last year.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Pressure?
I don’t see how we are under any more pressure than any other favorite is. If we lose to Houston is that a bad loss? Of course same for any high seeded vs low seeded team. If we lose to the HIGHER RANKED 5 seed MSU is that a bad loss? Hell no. Obviously we all want to see MD in the sweet 16 but not getting there this year can’t be considered a failure. Not under the circumstances we were given.
ok im gonna say what everybody is thinkin
This season is too eerily similer to grievis’s first year. The 7 game winning streak to end the season, the first round loss in the ACC tournament to an inferior opponent, a 4 seed in the NCAA tournament and the team we are playing has an amazing player, Stephen Curry for Davidson 3 years ago and Aubrey Coleman for Houston this year. And I cant shake the feeling that we will lose in the second round.
Everyone, Please
PLEASE stop comparing this year to 2007 (including you Ben). Is Georgia Tech inferior? Yes, but not by much. Miami in 2007 was much, much worse, and they schooled us BOTH times we played them, one of them at home. We’ve beaten everyone we should have since William & Mary; this did not happen in 2007, which included a sweep by UVA. Also, it was fairly obvious even before that game that Davidson were ballers.
You would think that Maryland was lucky to get into the tournament. Honestly, I get it that people think the ACC sucks this year, but I don’t want to hear these dickheads jocking Gary and the Terps if they get to the Sweet 16. The Terps have the ACC POY, 2 other senior starters, and a potential stud in the making in Jordan Williams.. But yeah, they suck and Gary Williams is a hack coach.
Everyone always talks about Grievis first, than our lack of size followed up with Jwill. Then they will give Milbourne his due. They bring up Gary williams and then they are done talking about us.
BUT Everyone is obviously forgetting Eric Hayes(who is much more athletic than i thought), Bowie’s ridiculous hot streak, and mosleys defense(and much better play over all) and dino’s better than avg. mid rage jumper.
Right now all of our guards are playing at a high level and I think the ncaa tourny, if you have 5 guards playing at a high level it will balance out the lack of size…
Want bulletin board material? Got bulletin board material!
The Terps were ticked off enough after losing a game to GT in the ACC Tourney that they know they should have won. Now, the national media is beating up on them, so you’ve go to think Gary has them circling the wagons.
I’ve followed this team all season and they simply thrive on adversity; they feed off of people telling them what they can’t do, then going out and proving the critics wrong.
Opponents (and “experts”) can go ahead and underestimate Maryland, but only at their own risk, because when the Terps are on their game they’ve shown themselves capable of playing at a very high level indeed.
I think they’re going to be energized from all the trash being heaped on them. Gary and his staff are going to sharpen their focus, Greivis is going to be even more fired up and determined, and the rest of the team will become even more cohesive with a heightened “back to the wall, we against them” mentality.
Criticized? Rejected? Pegged as losers? The Terps say bring it on, then talk to us later about it!
by Ken from Cincy on Mar 17, 2010 12:34 AM EDT reply actions
Reminds me of...
After we got blown out in the Duke game, critics started coming out of the woodwork and saying we were overated and our hot start to the acc schedule was about to nose dive. we had 3 games coming up with a hot UVA team to kick it off, and how did we respond… by beating the brakes off of UVA and winning 3 of 4 games in 8 days. I see us coming out and just overpowering Houston and this A. Colemen will get the same treatment Landesburg got. He will be a non factor and we will have a dominent win.

by 









