From The Bog, by way of homercles10. Pretty clear.

From The Bog, by way of homercles10.

Pretty clear.

almost 2 years ago Ben Broman 9 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Appreciate the shout out.

I knew we were in for a long game as soon as I saw Karl Hess as a referee.

by homercles10 on Mar 12, 2010 10:06 PM EST reply actions

gay

gt fans say “oh its 2 points we won by 5.” it woulda changed the momentum of the game completely

by marylandterps671 on Mar 12, 2010 10:12 PM EST reply actions

Terps almost never play well in the North Carolina Invitational. Its no great suprise-Gtech had everything on the line and Terps had nada. Nobody hangs a banner based on winning a first round ACC game.

by settleten on Mar 12, 2010 10:44 PM EST reply actions

My, my, my

Less than a week ago GTech fans were, en mass, saying they were giving up on Hewitt and their “beloved” team. I’d imagine they’ll be singing a different tune now. And they wonder why they’re stuck in the middle of the ACC as best.

Jokes, the lot of’em.

by ace4919 on Mar 12, 2010 10:55 PM EST reply actions

they're still upset

it’s gonna take more than a game to win back the Tech fans… we’ll see what happens next week when/if we renew Hewitt’s mega-contract

I spun around... and there I was, face-to-face with a six-year old kid. Well, I just threw my guns down and walked away. Little bastard shot me in the ass.

by BirdGT on Mar 12, 2010 11:34 PM EST up reply actions

If they called it off...

Would GV’s immediate answer 3 have counted? Thats the only reason this doesnt bother me is cuz with the 3 we actually cut into the lead by one pt. I mean if they called it off, GV maybe doesnt hit that 3 and we are down more. Not like this was our only chance to get the lead.

by Sephtical on Mar 13, 2010 1:08 AM EST reply actions

I'm unclear, but I believe not

People are arguing over the rules and I’ve heard it both ways, but I don’t believe it’s reviewable. If that’s the case, it’s an absolutely ridiculous rule. They can certainly review it in end-of-game situations and they can review to see if someone’s foot was on the 3 point line and take those points off the board, so you’d assume they could do the same here.

by Ben Broman on Mar 13, 2010 8:10 AM EST up reply actions

I missed the game

What’s the controversy with this play?

by terpfan812 on Mar 13, 2010 9:19 AM EST reply actions

1:20 left

GT up 3. Miller banks a layup off the glass, Favors grabs the rebound and gets the putback dunk. GT up 5. Only the shot clock had already gone off, so the shot shouldn’t have counted. But the officials refused to review it and gave GT the points. MD hit a three on the ensuing possession, meaning Maryland should’ve tied the game, not been down by 2.

by Ben Broman on Mar 13, 2010 9:41 AM EST up reply actions