The Big Picture: Maryland's Place in the ACC Race
Not too long ago, we thought that Maryland had a legitimate shot at the ACC regular season title - an outside shot, but a legitimate one. A few developments have made that dream significantly harder to achieve, but it's holding on by a thread. Let's take a look, shall we?
Here's what the top of the ACC looks like right now, using KenPom for the Avg. Rank and Predicted Record.
| Conference Record | Remaining Opp. Avg. Rank | Predicted Record | |
| Duke | 9-2 | 41 | 13-3 |
| Wake Forest | 8-3 | 40 | 11-5 |
| Virginia Tech | 7-3 | 37 | 10-6 |
| Maryland | 7-3 | 35 | 11-5 |
| Clemson | 6-5 | 29 | 8-8 |
| Florida State | 6-5 | 44 | 9-7 |
First, a few general observations: FSU is a darkhorse here. They have the easiest schedule, and they get the two remaining top 6 opponents - Clemson and Wake Forest - in Tallahassee. The fact that they have to travel to Charlottesville to face the Hoos is problematic, as is the fact that they have to play UNC in Chapel Hill, but if they can pull off a few hard road wins, they're a major contender.
Clemson, meanwhile, is pretty dead in the water unless they pull off a remarkable finish to the year. Not only is their schedule the hardest straight up, they have to travel to College Park, Tallahassee, and Winston-Salem. Bye-bye Tigers.
Virginia Tech is a team no one is talking about, but they could surprise some people; their schedule is by no means easy, but they get Wake and Maryland at home, and two of their road games are against Boston College and N.C. State, which they should win anyway.
But back to Maryland and what they need to do. I'll go with the less plausible model first: winning the ACC.
The Duke loss hurt, but was far from crippling. Maryland gets another shot at the Dukies, and it's at home this time. After seeing how Maryland has destroyed some teams at home, there's a good chance they pull off that upset. That would get them even with Duke, make up for the Cameron loss, and bring their record up to 12-4.
Assuming both teams were to go undefeated outside of that game (a probability for Duke...not so much for Maryland, but probably a necessity), they'd be tied at #1 and tied head-to-head. The next tie breaker would be record against the #3 team in the conference. If they're tied there, it'd go down to the next team, and so on and so forth, until there's a difference. It's looking increasingly likely that Wake Forest, whom Duke has beaten and Maryland lost to, will be that #3 team. Even if they were leapfrogged by any other team in the top 6, the record between Maryland and Duke would be a tie, and it would go down to the next opponent, which would eventually be Wake Forest.
In fact, the only shot Maryland has, assuming Duke only loses to Maryland, would be if Georgia Tech miraculously lost to Maryland but won their remaining four games and Wake Forest lost every remaining game OR won one remaining game and lost the tiebreaker to GT (that would get tpo complicated to predict). So, yeah, unlikely. It does make the Wake Forest loss hurt more, because GT might actually pass Clemson, and then Maryland would have the tiebreaker. But that's not the way it worked out, so that's not the situation.
Instead, to have any shot at actually winning the ACC, Duke would need to fall twice more this year (once to Maryland), and the Terps would have to go undefeated. Losing any game other than to Maryland would be a major shock for Duke - outside of MD, they have only one more top 50 opponent (VT), and that's at Cameron. So that's probably finished.
But Maryland's not out of it for second place. Again, they'd have to finish above Wake Forest - a tie would go to the Demon Deacons - but that's not impossible. Wake's schedule might look easy, but VT in Blacksburg and FSU in Tallahassee are probable losses. If Maryland went undefeated, that would be all it would take. If not, it would be a little harder and take one more loss, like N.C. State in Raleigh or the season closer against Clemson in Winston-Salem. Again, things would be made a lot easier if Maryland went undefeated the rest of the way.
But what's the big deal for second place? Isn't that just first loser? They still get a bye with 3rd place, right? Well, yeah, but it's all about seedings in the ACC Tournament. Let me ask you, would you rather play on a neutral court: Virginia, or Florida State? I assume the answer would be the Cavs, given how Greivis just demolished them. Well, that's the difference between 2nd and 3rd right now.
We'll keep track of this and occasionally check back in to see where Maryland stands, and what they're shot at winning the whole thing is.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Duke
We will give Duke their third loss. Who is the best bet to give them their fourth loss?
VT
In Cameron. They’ve done it before, and that’s probably the only legitimate shot. Maybe UVA on the road. Other than that, it’s Miami and UNC.
I wouldn't count out UNC
Remember when they were awful those 2 years during the Guthridge/Daugherty era? They still ended up beating duke a few times. If UNC could play up to their future potential for just one game that would be great for us.
Doubt, indulged and cherished, is in danger of becoming denial; but if honest, and bent on thorough investigation, it may soon lead to full establishment of the truth.
-Ambrose Bierce
Miami
I have a feeling they will lose to miami
by word2bigbird on Feb 16, 2010 11:28 AM EST up reply actions
Imagine if someone told you, after Maui, that this would be a post on Testudo Times. You would think they were out of their mind. While I would love a regular season title, a top three finish in the ACC would make me quite happy. Especially if that translated to a spot in the ACC tournament’s championship game.
If we end up 12-4 in the ACC, and win a game or two in the tournament, our NCAA seed should be good enough to get us into the sweet 16 (assuming we CAN beat a top team).
by nmprisons on Feb 16, 2010 11:33 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Agreed
This has been the most enjoyable team to watch in many years! Strong guard play and a little help from J WILL and Landon will do us well in the upcoming tourneys.
a very pleasant surprise ...
finishing out undefeated for the terps would be beyond sweet … but keep in mind this schedule facing GT, WF , VT and Duke will require a solid & different game strategy for each opponent … we need to push hard on NCSt , get a nice lead and then stretch our 3,4,5 players/scorers to step up on offense to build some shot confidence. Thanks again for your time and insight … Go Terps!
WF plays VT tonight. Should help clear the logjam.
How does tiebreaker record vs #3 apply when some teams play each other twice and some only once?
b. When comparing records against a single team or a group of teams, the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against a team or group is unequal. (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1; 1-0 is the same as 2-0; 2-0 is the same as 4-0; 2-1 is the same as 4-2; 1-0 is better than 1-1; 0-1 is the same as 0-2; 0-2 is the same as 0-4).
One interesting thing, though: if there’s a tie for #3, they don’t tiebreak #3 first. They use a combination of the records against the two teams. That wouldn’t really help MD anyway because the only other team MD has the advantage on is NC St. and they can’t into the top half, but it is intriguing. Regardless: rooting for GT and whatever team plays WF.
This is so obviously a flawed system
Especially when you take into road vs. home game scenarios. To think that we could potentially miss out on the ACC title b/c we lost in OT AT Wake, where Duke could theoretically beat them at home and get blown out at Wake and still win the tiebreaker. I doubt it will happen but it’s just a poor idea to start with.
Cart ahead of horse
I’d love to win the ACC, or finish second, but I’m concerned first with making the tourney, which we are not a lock for. If we get to 10 ACC wins, I think we’re in, but we’ve got three road games to go, and home games against three of the better teams in the ACC, including one team that is clearly better than us. If we go 2-4 in those games, we’ll be 9-7, and importantly, we will have lost the positive narrative, which will shift from “Maryland turned around its season” to “Maryland finished poorly and played themselves out of the tournament.” I feel pretty good about this team, they certainly have looked like a sweet sixteen team since the ACC season started, but I think they need to be careful down the stretch, there are some tricky games on the schedule. I think this NC State road game is deceptively important. If we can win it, we’ve got a cushion against dropping a home game to Duke or Clemson or Ga Tech. If we lose to NC State, then we’re in a fairly tight situation, needing 3 wins out of 5 against either good comp at home or road games.
VT
the VT vs UVA game seems to be telling. VT looks like a slightly better version of Virginia, and still not great. They have Malcolm Delaney who might be tougher to shut down than Landesburg was. I think VT is definitely playing with an inflated record right now. ESPECIALLY OOC

by 












