Duke Thrashes Maryland, 77-56
This game needs no big introduction. If you saw the game, you don't want to relive it. If you didn't see the game, trust me: you don't want the details.
For the sake of summary, Greivis Vasquez was nearly invisible until late the game, when he vainly tried to lead a comeback attempt, and ended up leading Maryland with 17 points. Other than that, it was a quiet game. Eric Hayes had 8 points early, but disappeared in the second half. Adrian Bowie, Landon Milbourne, Sean Mosley, and Jordan Williams combined for 20 points. That's it.
It shouldn't come as a big surprise, then, that Duke ended up with an easy win on Coach K's 63rd birthday and 1000th game, 77-56. After leading 6-5 with 17:17 remaining in the first half, Maryland disappeared and never made a game of it. Hey, at least it was better than last year's 40 point thrashing.
Not a lot went right for Maryland, offensively or defensively, but the biggest issues in the game were on the offensive end and were mostly controlled by Maryland. UMD shot just 36% from the floor and was a terrible 1-10 from beyond the stripe, and for a team that shoots well, that's crippling. Strangely, though, this wasn't a case of suffocating defense from Duke, although it was solid. No, Maryland got plenty of open looks at the basket and simply couldn't hit anything outside of 5 feet to save their lives. Any other day, Maryland would've shot at least 50% from the field and probably 50% from deep. Big difference.
The other major issue to me was turnovers, many of them unforced. Adrian Bowie simply dropped the ball on more than one occasion, and the normally steady Eric Hayes threw the ball away multiple times. Vasquez looked no better. Those empty possessions - there had to be almost 20, the stats aren't up yet - ended up in Duke points at the other end and presented no opportunity for Maryland to score. Won't win too many games doing that.
They were far from outstanding defensively, but they were certainly good enough. Allowing offensive rebounds was the biggest defensive culprit; it was Duke's 23 second chance points that hurt more than anything else they did. Brian Zoubek had nearly 20 boards all by himself; this game really exposed Maryland's rebounding struggles.
As for encouraging performances, Cliff Tucker wasn't bad and deserved to be on the floor for longer than he was. James Padgett was quietly solid; by no means was he great, but for whatever reason things ran much more smoothly when he was on the floor.
One quick note: a win in this game would've been gravy. Getting wins against top ten teams on the road is difficult to say the least. If Maryland goes 3-1 the rest of this four game stretch, they're 9-3 and everything's fine. That's what matters, much more than this game now. It'll be a quick turnaround, with Virginia on Monday.
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
disappointing
this is the 3rd time this season md has crippled under the hype of potentially being a top 25 team. Maui we didnt show, at clemson and today they just didnt play well at all. Should have gotten blown out at clemson aside from an awful performance from the tigers. A team with 3 senior starters shouldnt have this much trouble dealing with a little hype on the road.
Game over for Vasquez ACC POY hopes?
He was pretty invisible on one of the biggest stages of the year for the Terps.
BC Interruption, a Boston College sports blog
Possibly, but its a long year
He still had 17. If Maryland beats Duke at home, still a legitimate possibility, he’ll have a chance.
Dude got us within ten
by himself…… literally. The player that should be getting focused is Milbourne. Why does he always fade when his team needs him the most.
amowski and Murland
Normally I’d let those stand, but Brian’s far from a troll/flamer and is actually a friend of the blog. No harm done, just letting you know.
This was a straight up butt kicking, but I still think the Terps will win the rematch in College Park. Today was Duke’s day – airballs landed in their laps for easy put backs, some stiff did his best Bill Walton impression, and Maryland missed every single shot outside of 5 feet. Not saying the Dookies didn’t deserve to win, but you have to imagine that UMD will catch a few breaks at the Comcastle.
Plus they won’t have to contend with 9,000 ugly chicks and nerdy dudes screaming at them.
J-Will and Dino need coached up!!
There is no reason Zubick(sp?) should of had anywhere near as many offensive boards as he had. Gary and crew needs to work on the big guys. Get them to put there wide bodies in between the rim and they’re man. I saw several times there were 3 Terps standing near the basket and Zubick was in front of them. That can’t happen!!! I think almost all his points came on put backs. Come on Gary get these bigs workin harder on the glass. We need to make a statement against UVA now!!!
This blows
3 Main reasons for the loss
1.) I don’t think you mentioned this because you are trying to avoid excuses (I assume; or you mentioned it a couple of times last week and want to avoid repetition) but the time off was a huge negative and yet broadcasters rarely discussed it. Our poor shooting percentage, like you brought up, was not really due to Duke’s defense. The team as a whole was rusty and nothing else but the 6 days off can account for that.
2.) Brian Zoubek moves into the starting spot with significant playing time. When has this ever been the case before? I don’t know if Gary anticipated such a move either. Zoubek’s experience (years not necessarily in playing time) and his size were too much for us and for Jordan Williams particularly.
3.) Add to #2 the fact that Lance Thomas DID play after all (Belichek style). They are loaded in the post. Our only hope to counter them going in was guard play.
I still think # 1 is the major reason for the wide margin of victory. At least MD could have made a game of it otherwise. I would have preferred the regular schedule—even if only 1, 000 fans made it there. You could see the difference in intensity between the teams. Duke played on Wed. and had “warmed up” legs under them but MD didn’t.
I hope Wake loses…
we really need GT to beat Wake tonight
if we want at least a 2 seed in the ACC we need Wake to drop some games and fast because their schedule is very favorable down the stretch. The blown call on singler tripping stopped our momentum of getting back into the game. But that was hardly why we lost. Bad shooting for this team = a loss 9/10 times. (could have stolen the game at clemson anyway). So do we want Virginia or Tech to win tonight?
This is why
I hated and still hate Acc expansion. We should get another chance against Wake at home or a chance to beat UNC Boston College Miami again or Va Tech at home. The uneven Acc schedule needs to go. Take away some out of conference games if necessary.
I won’t even go into detail about how the addition of Miami BC and Vatech cost MD the ncaa tournament those years, but our recent inability to excel in the postseason just happens to coincide with the expansion.
Tucker, Tucker????
When are we going to see more of Tucker. He is one of the few guys on this team that can but the ball in the hole. Some games he only gets 10-11 mins. How do you get in to the flow of the game with 5 mins a half. Not sure why Gary pulls him sometimes. Hear he does not practice well, there have been a lot of good players that never practiced well. I think if he played 20-24 mins per game he would avg around 12 per game. Wouldn’t it be great if our 6th man could give you 12 points per game? It would make us that much tougher to be beat. More Tucker, Gary … PLEASE!!!!!!!
He also took 13 shots...
More than Vasquez, even. 5 of 13 ain’t bad, but he couldn’t put the ball in the hole when he had a few WIDE open threes.
Still think he deserves more minutes, though
FWIW, I'm working on a post on this
It’s not a response to you directly, I’ve seen this lots of places, so please don’t be offended when you see it. The argument makes sense, but Tucker really just provides one thing: scoring. Guys like Mosley and Hayes provide so much more. And scoring really isn’t the problem with this team.
Just a thought!!!
I agree he missed some wide open 3’s, but then so did everyone else. I think he would shoot better with more playing time… I have seen games where he has played 7-8 minutes in the 1st half and 3-4 in the 2nd half, when I don’t feel he played badly or did anything wrong in the 1st half. I think players need to know their roles, you cant play 6 mins one game 17 the next then back to 7 mins. I always thought Gary was to quick to pull his subs when they make a mistake. It is like they are almost afraid to error, because they know they will get pulled while a starter knows they are getting their mins. Look Vasquez, has had 8 or 9 turn overs and still played 35 mins. Believe me, I know we can’t win with out him, but sometimes he should be sat down for more than a min or two.

by 














