Testudo Times: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Rankings - BlogPoll Top 25

Sorting Out Possible Reactions from the Maryland-Clemson Game

This is an interesting post for me, because there are a whole number of unknowns in this equation. First off, one thing that needs to be said: no one needs to "pick a side" in this, so to speak. I honestly don't think that either extreme is correct - Maryland isn't suddenly one of the worst in the conference, nor did this loss not mean anything. The real state of this team is somewhere in between.

Anyway, people are flying left and right after this game. Some are vehemently defending Maryland's status. Others are saying that this loss is unacceptable. Is either side really right?

Star-divide

This was a loss on the road in a hostile environment against a good ACC team that is likely headed to the NCAA tournament. With about two minutes to go, Maryland would've been down just 2 points after playing perhaps the worst game of their lives - certainly their ugliest - had it not been for a horrendous offensive foul called on Greivis Vasquez. The entire game was atrociously called - on both sides, though it just so happened that a lot of Maryland fouls were game-changing - and Maryland won't face another team that plays like Clemson until they play Clemson at home later in the year. Clemson, too, was a team utterly desperate and hyped up to get a win.

So, no, the sky is not falling.

At the same time, the ugly truth of the matter is that this team rests squarely on the bubble after the loss, and I do think you have to take something out of this loss.

Before anything else, please don't call Clemson a ranked team. Yes, they checked in at 21st in the Coaches' Poll, but that was before they lost on the road to BC and would've almost surely fallen far had the poll date been the 30th instead of Feb. 1st. Also, I'm fairly certain that Demontez Stitt's presence helped them climb up those polls, and he was absent last night. Even if they were ranked, it was undeservedly so, and that argument doesn't hold up.

How many Maryland fans would've bet the house on the Terps had someone told them that Clemson would be missing their starting PG and Trevor Booker would only make two shots on the night? Those two stats illustrate just how bad this offensive breakdown was. 26 turnovers is a little stunning and, frankly, unacceptable for a team with two senior PGs.

It's also scary to look at Maryland's record against good teams. They're 1-4 against the Top 50 RPI. Ditto for KenPom ratings. Yes, they're very close to being 3-2 (Clemson and Wake losses), but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades, and the committee won't care if they were almost good enough. It's tough to fault a team for road losses to top 50 RPI teams, but that doesn't make the record any easier to swallow.

They don't have anything resembling a signature win, either, and have exactly two more tries to get one: at Duke on Feb. 13, and Duke at the Comcastle on March 3rd (Pe'Shon Howard will be in the house for that one). ESPN recently had a piece on the importance of the signature win, and it's something Maryland should know well - it's what got them into the tournament last year.

And yet, it's still not certain that Maryland will be on the bubble - every team has a down game occasionally. Duke lost to N.C. State on the road - does that mean that Duke is no longer a tournament team? Of course not. Maryland has played better than this all year, and to assume that this is how good this team really is a little ridiculous. They were just off tonight, and that will happen occasionally. 

Here's the thing: Maryland doesn't have any incriminating losses. Nor do they have any particularly encouraging wins, outside of the home win against FSU. We really don't know just how good or bad this team is yet. That's partially what makes the upcoming FSU game so important.

And there's the perfect segue: the Terps will get back on the horse on Thursday for that upcoming FSU game in Tallahassee. Should they win, they'll probably climb off the bubble, having proved their worth and moved to 2-4 against the Top 50. Remember, too, that in my ACC Contention Roadmap only one win in this road trip was necessary. They can still get that, and, though I wouldn't go so far as to say it's a must-win, a loss could be the start of an ugly, trademark Maryland slump. It's a very important game, now much moreso than the Clemson game just before it. I have a feeling it will be a very long four days.

0 recs  |  Comment 7 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'll look on the bright side...

…the Terps played a horrible game and somehow were in a tie game with 5:30 left.

That’s either a good sign for Maryland, or an indication of just how bad Clemson is.

http://newyorksportsjerk.blogspot.com/

by New York Sports Jerk on Feb 1, 2010 10:56 AM EST reply actions  

At least UNC lost to UVA at home

the bigger they are, the harder they fall

by Bboydragon25 on Feb 1, 2010 11:07 AM EST reply actions  

Not a big loss

Losing to a good ACC opponent on the road is not a huge deal. A game like that is a free roll – a win is a big positive, a loss is a small negative. We do need to pick off a team on the road to get to 10 ACC wins, but we’ll have a few other good opportunities.

Terps looked horrible for stretches, but the ball bounced the wrong way all game, and it wouldn’t have taken much to pull off a win. Not pleased, but I think it’ll be easy to move past this one. A win against FSU will quickly wipe away any concern.

by Brooklyn D on Feb 1, 2010 11:40 AM EST reply actions  

While this wasn't a 'bad loss'...

because you have to give Clemson’s interior D credit, I was disheartened by our lack of ability to close it out. Despite how sloppy we were, we had every opportunity to close this thing out down the stretch. Missed layups, poor decisions etc led this to unravel. A good team finds a way to get a few must have baskets in a close game. That’s all it would’ve taken here.

by Sephtical on Feb 1, 2010 4:06 PM EST reply actions  

GV - a great player?

not worried about the loss, but GV disaapears at big moments. I know he was amazing against UNC last year, but this year he was horrible when we had 3 straight possessions to tie Nova. He could have beaten WF at the end of reguulation or OT. Last night he missed a 3 footer when we were up two and then he missed another short shot when the game was tied. To be a great player he needs to shine in big moments.

by bobbie34 on Feb 1, 2010 4:17 PM EST reply actions  

We have to improve on offense and rebounding to win on the road

The team is doing well at Comcast. Our three seniors and Sean have scored at will at times and we’ve needed Jordan mostly for rebounding and D. We can rely on 3s and mid-range jumpers to carry the day. Whatever inside scoring we get is a bonus. However, we can’t do the same thing on the road. Looking at the Clemson and Wake games, there are three areas where we have to change and improve on offense. First, we have be aggressive in receiving passes. Clemson did a great job of stopping Greivis and Eric and making them start our flex from near mid-court. It made their first passes long and easier to intercept. Instead of coming up to receive passes and even blocking out their defenders to be in a better position to receive a pass, the wings hung back and forced Greivis and Eric to throw pinpoint passes. In wasn’t just limited to starting the flex. We were not aggressive in receiving passes in breaking the press nor in running the flex. We’re going to see the same kind of defense from Duke, UVA, FSU, and some others. We need to recognize that we have to work hard to complete passes in road games. Second, we can’t rely on perimeter and mid-range shooting to carry the day on the road. Fighting to just run the offense takes anyone out of rhythm which makes shooting more difficult. The lighting and backgound is different. No crowd support means you can feel tiredness more. So, shooting percentages just go down on the road. An inside game makes a huge difference especially if it can get us to the foul line. That means getting Jordan more directly involved with the offense. Plus, when Landon is matched against someone like Grant or Aminu, it becomes even more important. Landon just can’t score against taller, quicker players like them. Jordan will make mistakes but he is coming on strong and looks like he is ready to do more scoring. Third, we need to improve our rebounding. Jordan is definitely getting better. Plus, when he or Sean get both hands on the ball, they can bring it down. By comparison, Landon is not getting the job done and Dino doesn’t do much better. It is not lack of effort. Physically, Landon is just overmatched at times. I don’t know the answer. Does James need to get more minutes playing alonside Jordan, i.e., Jordan would do our frontline scoring and James would be there for D and rebounding? Should GW try Landon at the 3? I think we can improve our passing and get more scoring from Jordan. I don’t see a simple solution to improving our rebounding problems.

by wmterp on Feb 1, 2010 5:04 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Maryland Terrapins.
Start posting about the Terrapins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
What We Learned Against Navy
Small
Lawson to Purdue
Small
New Espn Top 100
Picture_1_small
Phil Costa makes the Cowboys' 53-man roster
Ray
NEW AD
Small
Faust down to four
Small
Ater Majok transfers from UConn
Small
ACC BBall Espn Article
Picture_1_small
Ravens trade for Josh Wilson
Small
Deuce Bello+MD= ESPN Top Plays

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Share This Post

Next Game

Morgan St. Bears
@ Maryland Terrapins

Saturday, Sep 11, 2010, 6:00 PM EDT
Chevy Chase Bank Field at Byrd Stadium

Terps Could Play Three QBs Against Morgan State
Maryland Minute - 09.06.10 - Terps Win!

Complete Coverage >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

LANDOVER MD - SEPTEMBER 06:  Safety #23 Jeron Johnson of and cornerback #21 Jamar Taylor of the Boise State Broncos celebrate defeating the Virginia Tech Hokies 33-30 at FedExField on September 6 2010 in Landover Maryland.  (Photo by Geoff Burke/Getty Images)

College Football BlogPoll Top 25 Week 2: Boise State Inches Closer

Georgia wide receiver A.J. Green talks to the media during the Southeastern Conference football media days on Thursday, July 22, 2010, in Hoover, Ala. (AP Photo/ Butch Dill) +4 updates

Georgia WR A.J. Green Suspended For Four Games

Boise State quarterback Kellen Moore (11) celebrates with fans and teammates including Boise State defensive end Ryan Winterswyk (98) after winning their NCAA college football game against Virginia Tech 33-30, Monday, Sept. 6, 2010, at FedEx Field in Landover, MD.  (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

2010 Heisman Trophy Threat Level Watch: Kellen Moore Starts At The Top

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Marylandflag_small Ben Broman

Authors

Testudo_logo_small Dave Tucker

Vasquez_small Ben Goldstein