Why Maryland Needed To Move On From Ralph Friedgen
First, I want to preface this by saying this discussion seems to have at least partially divided Terrapin Nation. Regardless of where you come down in this debate, please remember to keep it civil.
I started off my freshman year at Maryland during Ralph's first year. I still have my "Fridge Fever - It's Red Hot. Catch it!" tee shirt. It was a magical season - traveling to Georgia Tech to see Novak kick that game winner in OT, going to NC State to see us clinch the ACC and have students throw oranges onto State's field, and even going to the Orange Bowl (even though the result sucked) was amazing. So were both the Gator and Peach Bowls. Ralph has done a lot for this program and regardless of where you come down in this debate, every Maryland fan should thank him for making football relevant at Maryland again. But even after an ACC title, 7 bowl games and 2 ACC Coach of the Year awards, Maryland knew it had to move on from Ralph Friedgen. And while it appears this is the first time a BCS school has let a coach go after they won a coach of the year award, that doesn't mean this decision was wrong.
As I said, I like Ralph and I think he did a tremendous job quickly turning a dormant Maryland football program and making it relevant again for Terps fans. But while Ralph did a lot of good for the program, last season was arguably one of the worst in Maryland football history, with the program suffering double-digit losses for the first time ever. And while Ralph and the staff did a lot to bounce back from that 2-10 season, the program really should have never been in that position in the first place. And had that 2-10 season not happened, there is no way Ralph wins the ACC Coach of the Year award this season. Thus, I think you can dismiss the argument that Ralph should have stayed because he was this season's Coach of the Year. If you don't lost 10 games in 2009, he's not winning that award for going 8-4 in 2010, it's as simple as that. But aside from that argument, there are still several other reason why Maryland needed to move on without Ralph.
1. Without an extension, Ralph was a lame-duck coach in 2011 after Franklin departed for Vanderbilt.
Kevin Anderson seemed to not want to extend Ralph beyond 2011, the year in which his contract was set to expire. Anderson had to be worried and weary about extending Ralph, since Maryland's record over the last five seasons was 33-30 under Friedgen. With unsold suite and unsold seats in Byrd, Anderson couldn't commit to extending Ralph beyond 2011 for fear that he wouldn't be able to win enough to re-capture fan interest to sell more tickets and suites. And if Friedgen didn't continue to perform at a high level, he was probably worried he'd have to buy out Ralph and presumably a new coaching staff, on top of not selling enough tickets, which would have put the Athletic Department in a bad situation financially. Thus, Anderson made the judgement that extending Ralph was too risky. But since Franklin was gone, there was no coach in place for after the 2011 season. That makes getting and maintaining recruits hard. And add in the fact that Maryland's best recruiter just left for Vandy and you're looking at a disaster waiting to happen on the recruiting front. Once Anderson decided it was too risky to extend Ralph, he in essence made him a lame duck and Anderson knew he couldn't have a lame duck coach for an entire year without having a successor in place. So the best solution was to make that change now, rather than wait.
2. The Fan Support for Ralph was Lacking
In Ralph's first game at Byrd in 2001, just over 44,000 fans showed up to watch Maryland beat North Carolina. As the team kept winning that season, those numbers kept increasing. By the last game of the season against Clemson in 2001, when Maryland had a chance to clinch at least a share of the ACC title, 52,462 filed in to pack Byrd. People were again interested in Maryland football. Even in 2004, when Maryland was mathematically unable to become bowl eligible and had a somewhat meaningless home game against Wake to close out the season, over 48,000 turned out for the game. People were willing to forget one disappointing season after experiencing 3 straight great seasons. But since then, fan interest has started to fade when it comes to Maryland football. The Terps haven't had a dominant season since Ralph's first three years in College Park. And fan attendance has started to trickle down. This season, in the final home game, with the Terps playing for their 8th win of the season, just over 35,000 showed up at Byrd. In the previous game, against FSU, at night, with the ACC title on the line, just over 48,000 showed up for the game, well short of a sell out. That game should have been a sell out. When it wasn't, I feared it could spell trouble for Ralph because if that didn't create enough buzz to sell out the stadium (a stadium which is on the smaller side compared to other ACC schools), what was going to? That lack of fan support has left the athletic department with less money than they probably anticipated from football ticket sales and leaves the newly added suites at Byrd unfilled. No fans = no money. And football is the biggest money maker in college athletics.
3. Franklin's Departure Forced Anderson' Hand
Had James Franklin not become the head coach of Vanderbilt, he likely would have taken over for Ralph after next season. And having Franklin lined up to do that meant Maryland didn't have to worry about a "lame duck" excuse when talking to both recruits and fans. But once Franklin bolted, that immediately changed. And Franklin's departure also meant he would likely take some of the current coaches with him. That matters for two reasons. First, if they were to buy out Friedgen, they'd also have to buy out his assistant coaches, since the new coach they hired would want to bring in their own staff. Franklin's departure gives them a great advantage to do the buy out now, as they'd have to pay a lower number of coaches,since several are following Franklin to Vandy. Second, assuming some coaches do follow Franklin, that would mean Ralph would have to hire new coaches to replace them. And most coaches wouldn't want to go somewhere for a year, not knowing if their boss would still be there the following year. And even if they did, if Maryland let Friedgen go after 2011, that would mean Maryland would be responsible for buying out all of those coaches who he hired in 2010, assuming they were given multi-year deals when hired to work on Ralph's staff. So with Franklin's departure, this was yet another reason Anderson had to move forward without Ralph. Financially, this was the best time to make a move and in terms of the good of the program, this was the best opportunity to make a change.
I don't think this is how Kevin Anderson pictured this who situation developing. I think once information got out that hinted at Ralph possibly not being back next year, that caused a snowball affect that leaves us sitting here tonight still trying to catch our breath. Do I think this situation has been handled as well as it could have been? Probably not. But I have no doubt that this was the correct move to make for the Maryland football program and for the athletic department at the University of Maryland. The opportunity was there and, presuming they do indeed hire Leach, his name will likely put more butts in seats in Byrd next year. His hire is a commitment that Maryland wants this program to take that next step, up from mediocre/occasionally relevant to a national football power.
I wish Ralph the best and thank him for everything he's done to put Maryland football in this position. I hope he'll stay on in some capacity at Maryland. But if Maryland wanted to make their program more relevant, this was the time to act, for a variety of reasons. I'll be going to the Military Bowl to give Ralph his one last hurrah and send him off in style with a "W." I hope others will do the same. But I also hope others see why this was necessary for the overall outlook of the football program at Maryland.
40 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What happened to my fanpost
I thought it was funny,
by Fridge-deserved-better on Dec 19, 2010 1:58 AM EST reply actions
the site says it was never published
It says your only activity was making the comment you made above. Maybe try again?
I'm happy to have Mike Leach
we may finally play a season opener against the SEC in the GA Dome now. That is what I always wanted. The hype leading up to the game is always crazy.
Great Post
I’ve been saying the same thing for days.
But I think the best part was how you phrased the “this was the correct move” option in the poll.
I think almost all of us that are “in favor” of the move, definitely view it as an unfortunate situation that came about because of a “perfect storm” that no one really could have predicted. And the timing wasn’t ideal. “Unfortunate” really is the best way to describe this, but in the end—KA’s job is do what is best for the program, and I think he made the right move.
Thanks go to Fridge, I hope these wounds heal and he can remain with the program as some sort of consultant. Go Terps.
I'm surprised no one has mentioned
How Ralph’s health/weight/age may have factored into this. In addition to all the reasons Dave mentioned, extending Ralph would have been very risky due to health issues. I’m not trying to pile on here, but Ralph does not look to be in great health, has had health scares in the past, and the possibility of him being able to coach out the entirety of a four year extension is very questionable. It would have been way too risky of a move for Anderson to commit to.
Not sure if anyone else here has posted this, but in addition to Leach and the Air Raid offense, it appears Maryland will be sporting totally new uniforms, including four “turtle shell print” helmets – Black, White, Yellow, Red – four Jersey’s and three or four different pants. This adds up to a huge amount of different uniform combinations. Add this to the possibility of an extremely dynamic offense…. Can you say Oregon of the east? (In a few years of course)
Where'd you hear about the unis?
by BaltimoreSportsFan on Dec 19, 2010 11:19 AM EST up reply actions
My bro and a few other friends (I am an 06' alum)
Are in a special sports management program fellowship at UMD biz school (sometimes get to speak to people in the know) and I also know a few other people connected with the program who “usually” know these things – enough for me to believe it. While I can’t be sure and don’t want to make it seem as fact – it does make a lot of sense – and I believe it has been in the works for some time. Under Armour is serious about competing with Nike – and what better way then to become to UMD what Nike is to Oregon. What was missing in the past was a relevant football program and a charismatic coach who can sell said program. If all goes well we have that in Leach. Kevin Plank is a really smart dude and I’m pretty damn sure he has had a major hand in all the recent events that have occurred.
DOB tweeter recently that he saw the new uniforms.
So while that isn’t proof of multiple combinations it does seem like we will definitely be sporting new threads next year.
If you were a hotdog would you eat yourself? I know I would.
by Knubles and Bits on Dec 19, 2010 12:21 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Tweeted.
If you were a hotdog would you eat yourself? I know I would.
by Knubles and Bits on Dec 19, 2010 12:21 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Great comments
I think you’re correct about these changes being linked to UA marketing goals. I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that the possibilty of making these program changes was discussed with Anderson when he was interviewed for the AD position. The program is going corporate and the AD has to be favorably disposed to the change. Going corporate also makes sense for this area given its wealth and the competition from local pro teams. There are risks but eliminating non-revenues might be the only other option.
I wonder if there is any chance that the new uniforms would be unveiled for the bowl game?
If you were a hotdog would you eat yourself? I know I would.
by Knubles and Bits on Dec 19, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions
Yea I didn't think about it
upstaging RFs last game. Probably won’t happen.
If you were a hotdog would you eat yourself? I know I would.
by Knubles and Bits on Dec 19, 2010 6:39 PM EST up reply actions
Reflection
Vanderlinden wasn’t happy about being displaced. He knew what he had in stock hence the three 10 win seasons. Somehow i think Fridge thinks the same way with 67 freshmen and sophomores. Probably why he wanted to coach beyond next year. Anything but three 11 win seasons will be a failure. Pressure is on.
Nature of the beast
It’s the nature of the beast. Either you win with your players or someone else will. Sure Ralph, did a good job in the early days but the program was becoming a joke. With millions of people out of a job, he should be thankful for a $2 million severance package at age 63. He could have kept on coaching if he got the job done, but he didn’t.
We were 8-4 playing against inferior competition. You will not get star recruits to sign up to play FIU and Morgan State. Who are we going to play next – Georgetown Hoyas and Delaware State so Ralph can be 10-2 and get another 2 year extension. If the coach cannot get his team in the top 25 team year after year, he needs to resign or get fired.
Uh
5-3 in ACC, 3rd best ACC record – you beat who you play – Ralph did it. New ADs usually like to bring in someone they want – reality is the perfect storm of bad timing got Fridge. He’s a good man and good coach. I don’t care who recruited what, he got it done over all in the ACC. His record in the ACC during his tenure (47-39) should be compared to other ACC schools’ records. Go ahead look it up. Ga Tech, perceived as a much better program under (G. O’Leary, Chan Gailey and Paul Johnson, has a 48-38 record in the ACC over Fridge’s time at UMD. Be fair and post some stats before calling the program mediocre. I should know miserable too, as my friends and I sat through year after year of getting beat from ‘90 onward. Know your history, or your doomed to repeat it. Unless Kevin P. ponies up a 5 Mil donation, the budget cuts are gonna make it hard for AD Anderson to come up with the dough for Coach Leach. Unless we get a good deal because he’s damaged goods.
by bball purist on Dec 19, 2010 3:32 PM EST up reply actions
Lets talk stats
First, don’t know where your getting them at, but well, there wrong.
Ralph is 43-37 in the ACC during his tenure. Take out the 18-5 record during the first 3 seasons and your left with a 25-32 record with his own players. Now that’s embarrassing.
Since you brought up GT, lets look at those numbers. Again your numbers are wrong. There ACC record in the last 10 years is 48-32. Now take out the first 3 years like I did with MD and your left with a record of 36-20. That’s 11 more wins for those of you keep track at home.
It should also be noted that GT has never had a loosing record in ACC play during the last 10 years. MD on the other hand has had 4 loosing records in ACC play.
GT has also had a winning record in each of the last 10 years, except this year in which they’re 6-6. Though they could still finish with a winning record if they win their bowl game.
MD on the other hand has had 4 loosing season in just the last 7 seasons alone.
So yes, I would say MD has been mediocre in recent times, while GT has had a stronger program during the same time frame. And they’ve done it with 3 different coaches, which makes it all the more impressive.
Don't get me wrong
I more then appreciate what Fridge did for this program. He brought us back from the dead. And for that we can’t thank him enough. Personally, I don’t think this whole thing was handled very well, but it is what it is. The change needed to be made.
Ralph took us from being a bottom of the pack program to a middle of the pack program. But I think we can all agree, we want more then just middle of the pack. I’m not expecting multiple national championships. Just a winning record year in and year out with some ACC championships tossed in. Is that too much to aspire for? If your answer is anything other then no, then you can’t possible be a true MD fan.
by JRS42886 on Dec 19, 2010 6:32 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Uniforms
I saw the Ralph Friedgen Coach’s Show a couple of weeks ago. They featured the equipment manager getting the black & camo uniforms ready for the Florida State game, and he was saying that they plan to do a lot of new uniform combinations in the future. Presumably that is some type of agreement between the school and UnderArmour, so I assume it will go on no matter who the coach is.
A lot of people bash Oregon because of all of the different unis
but I fucking love it.
If you were a hotdog would you eat yourself? I know I would.
by Knubles and Bits on Dec 19, 2010 3:30 PM EST up reply actions
Bigger Question Now is
Why take on the baggage and risk by hiring Leach? This is a guy who has two pending lawsuits, a penchant (acknowledged by his detractors and supporters) for being an overboard full metal jacket “teacher” of young men, and a lot more salary to get him (even with the baggage, he knows how UMD needs him now – UMD not dealing from a position of strength). This could also backfire, and no writer as of yet has explored that possibility.
And Dave – even though you started at Maryland in ’01, you surely know how the previous 15 years went – to say “The opportunity was there and, presuming they do indeed hire Leach, his name will likely put more butts in seats in Byrd next year. His hire is a commitment that Maryland wants this program to take that next step, up from mediocre/occasionally relevant to a national football power” “medicore/occasionally relevant” does not take into account the 1 bowl appearance in 15 years.
And as far as Leach putting fans in the seats, it’s not entirely true – winning helps a little too. If you cannot sell winning, sell hype…if you cannot sell hype, sell hope. It looks like our new AD is throwing the Fridge out with the bath water, and trying to package hype and hope in one neat little Christmas package – I for one think Fridge has been Scrooged.
Fridge got screwed bigtime, yes. I feel bad for him.
But honestly its better for the program. KA could have played nice and just let a “meh” season from fridge next year go by THEN found a new coach (lets face it fridge wasn’t getting an extension), but he took immediate action instead after franklin left.
Leach is an amazing football coach. He’s a huge name in the college football world and will actually get people talking about maryland football. That’s what we need. This program was going nowhere fast under fridge.
Leach is less of a liability than you believe
The two lawsuits are ones HE brought against Texas Tech and ESPN for wrongful termination and slander, respectively. How is he defending his name and reputation baggage?
Yes, maybe its better for the program
I do also think this move is more a statement about Coach Franklin as Anderson let him stroll right out the door. Which goes back to the long held theory that new ADs like to put their people they choose (or KP chose?) in head coaching spots asap (unless its a legendary coach of course).
Leach Is A Good Football Coach
He is not a “great” or “amazing” coach. It is a very good hire for UMD, im not saying it isn’t. But people who think Leach is going to make UMD into one of the top programs in the country are a little premature with their thoughts. Leach had one very good year at Texas Tech where he went 11-2. 8 of his 10 years their ended with at least 4 losses.
People who think Leach will be a great recruiter in the area, i.e consistent top 20 classes, are wrong as well. Leach had 1 top 25 class in 10 years at TT, in an area with much more talent then the DC/MD/VA area. He brings in players for his system, dont expect him to pull many 4 or 5 stars from the area.
aholla, don't look at stats, it's hope we're shooting for
All the “Fridge needs to move on” crew do not want to look at real stats and history. Leach is a risky pick for head coach. Sometimes the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t know…but wait a minute, we have seen his inner demons – and they’re not too pretty! Full metal jacket Leach will self destruct again …
by bball purist on Dec 19, 2010 5:03 PM EST up reply actions
Here's the thing
Aholla30 cited a few stats, including one where he said “8 of his 10 years their [sic] ended with at least 4 losses.”
That is true. But here is the other side of that. Everyone wants to keep Fridge because he went 8-4 this year, with a bowl game loss, we hit 8-5. Mike Leach, in his last 8 seasons (2002-09), never finished worse than 8-5. During that same time period, Maryland had a LOSING record 4 times.
No one can predict the future. But based on past performance (the best indicator we have of future success), one could reasonably expect that Maryland, under Friedgen, would be maxing out around 9-4, once every three or four seasons. The rest of the time we would be 5-7, occasionally dipping below that. Under Leach, it looks like there is a good chance that we are hitting 8-4 or so on a yearly basis, and every three years or so, we’d have a shot at an 11 win season and an ACC championship.
Again, no one can predict the future. But I would also suggest that it is easier to win in the ACC than in the Big 12, team are constantly moving up and down (see, e.g., NC State this year, Wake a few years back, UNC from bottom to top (until suspensions)). One big spark may be enough to vault us to the top, in a league where there is no true bluebood power, like Texas, Oklahoma, Ohio State, or Florida.
I would be interested to hear a bit more about these “infractions” you are so hung up on. I’m not saying they don’t exist, I’m just saying that the only one that has any press is the James incident (which seems to be blown out of proportion).
Also, I suggest you read a response to your earlier post about those of us ignoring “real stats.” Those in glass houses…
I should add
I love Fridge for what he did here. I think he did a great job. I remember going to games in the Duffner era with my dad when I was no more than 7 or 8 years old, and wondering how he could possibly be interested in Maryland football. Somewhere in the Vanderlinden era I caught the bug as well—but I credit Fridge with giving me a fullblown Terps Football disease.
I just think Kevin Anderson had a choice between two decisions, both of which were risky. He took the one that had the higher upside, in my opinion. Hard to really criticize that decision, from a rational perspective.
It's good
you were able to see some of the real bad, because in correctly describing a choice that has higher upside, it also has higher downside. Only time will tell. I will wait and see like the rest of you, and only then can we truly reflect on this mess. And, yes, it’s a mess. It was not handled properly, i.e., with class and dignity for all parties involved. And that does matter to me and many fans – HOW things are done is reflective of the school’s administration. Right now, I’m not too happy with how they’re treating an alum of the school. And winning more than Fridge did will not totally wipe that away.
by bball purist on Dec 19, 2010 8:24 PM EST up reply actions
I think you are still oversimplifying
I don’t think KA wanted to act as quickly as he did. I’m assuming there were some talks with Leach that resulted in the framework of a deal, and somehow this all got leaked. Since it had the potential of truly spiraling out of control, the timeframe for everything was sped up a few weeks. Basically, I think it was sloppy, not mean-spirited.
And I’m really not seeing how much of a higher downside Leach has. The only way he could truly devastate our program is if he blatantly cheats. Thus far, I’ve seen no evidence that he engaged in anything serious, other than the James incident (which again, is overblown).
Outside that worst case scenario (which is the risk with any new coach, really), I don’t see how he is going to go like, 3-9 every year. At worst, it will probably be more of the same.
I guess I see it like this (these numbers are meaningless, merely illustrative): 50% chance we become a noticeably better program, year in and year out, under Leach. 1% chance that we end up in sanctions and the program is crushed. The remaining percentage point is basically some sort of “status quo.”
I don’t think it is like 50% we improve, 50% we are devastated. And I think you’d be hard pressed to argue that is the case. Every action has risk. The fact that the true risk of this decision is so remote, and the benefit is so likely, makes it a must-do.
Media
I agree, but today’s instant media did not allow that to happen. What were KA’s options when asked about the status of Ralph for next year? Was he supposed to lie? He said he had no comment, and then details were leaked to the media by sources, as is customary in this day and age. I’m sure it did not go down the way KA wanted to go down.
In the End
We’re all Terps fans who want the best for the team. However, we disagree on how to get there. It’s obviously a timing thing. The group of guys we have now are talented and hard workers with good attitudes, otherwise they would not have been able to turn things around this season.
But I do not know why (because our AD would not comment on it at all) coach Franklin was simply let go. I wish our AD would publicly come out and say that he did not believe he could get it done at UMD as Head Coach in 2012. I think he would have, and Fridge thought he’d be a good HC too. But college sports is a rough business – even old alums get thrown to the curb.
I'm a little confused
Didn’t Ralph’s agent recently say the Fridge should get a contract extension? How does that translate to Franklin being HC in 2 years? So we have year of possible conflict between Ralph and Franklin. And giving the HC job to Franklin still disses Ralph, right? It’s a difficult decision no matter how you look at, unless you’re going to give Ralph an extension. And if you do, Franklin bolts anyway. KA dealt with it sooner rather than later.















