Testudo Times: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Rankings - BlogPoll Top 25

Maryland Falls Back to Earth Against Clemson, Loses 62-53

Maryland has the second most efficient offense in the ACC, behind only Duke, and it's not a wide margin. If you just started watching tonight, though, you'd have no idea. Actually, if you just started watching tonight, you might think Maryland was the worst offense in the ACC.

They turned the ball over 26 times, shot 25% from deep, and scored just 53 points (they average 80+ a game) in likely the worst offensive performance of the season. Clemson's ultra-high pressure defense contributed to plenty of that, but it was still plenty ugly to watch. In the end, Maryland couldn't overcome that offensive tragedy of a performance and fell back to earth after a four game winning streak, losing 62-53. For what its worth, the game was closer than the score, but not by all that much.

This entire loss can be really narrowed down to two things: turnovers and rebounding. It's almost impossible to win when a team turns the ball over as many times as they did. The second major issue was offensive rebounding, where Clemson dominated. They didn't get an absurd number of second chance points, but they did grab 20 rebounds. I'll repeat: twenty. It's demoralizing and disrupts the flow of the game for Maryland.

Does this terrible performance mean that Maryland's previous awesome performances were simply products of poor opposition? Not necessarily. Few teams play like Clemson, who pushes the ball at a ridiculous helter-skelter pace and plays very, very high-pressure defense. It's jarring for any team. I'm confident that Maryland is better than they played and is still an NCAA tournament team.

At the same time, perhaps its time to temper the views of this team. They looked awful tonight in basically every aspect of the game, and that usually doesn't happen for ACC-leading teams.

I will say this, though: this team continues to show a ton of heart, fight, and persistence. They could've given up when down 11 in the second and unable to hold on to the ball. They didn't though, never panicked, and slowly fought their way back into the game.

I'm not really going to talk too much about individual performances, but its clear that this entire team was out of sync tonight. If each player really is this bad, then they don't have much of a chance in the ACC, and I don't believe that to be true. Like Coach K said yesterday, sometimes it just doesn't work. (Yes, I will go wash my mouth out with soap for referencing Coach K).

I will, however, talk about Jordan Williams, who was simply outstanding against one of the best post players in the country in Trevor Booker. He put up 13 points and 13 rebounds for his third double-double of the season, and he kept Booker to his lowest point output on the season. He also had a completely monstrous dunk that would've made the Comcastle collapse at it been at home. His progression has been truly remarkable.

The key for this two game road trip was to split one of the two. That can still be accomplished. They'll have to forget this and go win at FSU on Thursday.

0 recs  |  Comment 32 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

just terrible

on so many levels. pack it in. if bowie, a guard, doesn’t know that he should try a 3pointer when down by 5 with less than a minute, this team has no chance. Pack it in rather than getting your hopes high. you call yourself a basketball team? terps have the worst basketball iq i’ve ever seen.

by mkjo on Jan 31, 2010 7:53 PM EST reply actions  

Pack it in?

Are you kidding me? Yeah, let’s “pack it in” after losing in one of the toughest places to play in the country, to a ranked team, to fall to 4-2 and second in the ACC. After four ACC wins by an average margin of 18, with an overtime loss at Wake and a loss at Clemson where we were ahead with 5 minutes to play.

I think it’s YOUR basketball IQ that is lacking. Really, really lacking.

by jellisjenius on Jan 31, 2010 10:25 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

GET OUT OF HERE

Clearly mkjo is not a Maryland fan. We played awful on the road tonight against a top 40 team and still almost won. We were beaten in every aspect of the game but the killer was defensive rebounding. They would have had 20 fewer points if we had given a better effort. This game was an aberration and will not happen again. That being said, obviously we’re not going to win a national championship but the ACC is still up for grabs.

by jhough813 on Jan 31, 2010 8:04 PM EST reply actions  

JWill was the only Terp to show up. The Only one

by The Fin on Jan 31, 2010 8:14 PM EST reply actions  

Actually they all showed up on D…but that’s only half of the game, unfortunately.

by jellisjenius on Jan 31, 2010 10:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I am not so sure

Clemson offense is truly terrible. All though I will give u that we once again shut down an elite post player.

by ccrun1800 on Jan 31, 2010 10:41 PM EST up reply actions  

We be ok

alot of the calls didnt go our way. one or two more possessions of not turning it over or making layups and we would have won. williams played amazing and hes only going to get better. i say give padgett a chance. i know dino plays good D but he seems so shaky with the ball in his hands and tonight was the first time ive seen him make one of those mid range jump shots. they got almost every lose ball

by TpTerp033 on Jan 31, 2010 8:17 PM EST reply actions  

Totally agree

Hopefully Dino’s performance tonight will give Padgett a shot at some quality minutes against FSU.

by callmecostanza on Jan 31, 2010 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

One Word

Sloppy. that’s the one thing that can be said about this game. they didn’t rebound, nobody boxed out, they looked completely careless with the ball in their hands, and downright looked like they had no right actually being on the court tonight. the fact that the pretty much shut down one of the best post players in the game in booker and still lost by 9 is unfathomable.

they really need to put a ton more emphasis on rebounding in practice this week, and they need desperately to stop dribbling. i can’t even count how many times a terp dribbled into trouble. they team really needed to slow down, find its bearings on offense, and pass the ball around to create shots. i know that sounds incredibly simplistic, but i can’t remember any of the players doing that tonight. they really need to step up against FSU, or they’ll be in trouble.

by Joshv37 on Jan 31, 2010 8:38 PM EST reply actions  

give some credit to clemson..they played good defense. maryland played a lousy, sloppy game. a step and sometimes 2 steps slow all night. the terps needed to split the 2 road games and now they really need a good win on the road at fl. st. they are not going to win every game and they’re not going to play great every game. other than jordan williams you could be critical of every guy who played and be critical of the coaching staff too…but just forget it. game over we lost. on to the next game. end of story.

by fkterp on Jan 31, 2010 8:38 PM EST reply actions  

I don't know how we did with points-in-the-paint but we have to develop more of an inside game.

We tied the game and were running our flex. I thought we had Clemson on their heels at that point, but we couldn’t work the ball inside. One reason is that Landon had trouble going up against Grant and Booker. The other is that we don’t seem to be looking for Jordan. The long term answer may be that we have to develop and use James more on the frontline to beat teams like Clemson. In the meantime though, we need to work to get Jordan open in the flex and look for him in the offense.

by wmterp on Jan 31, 2010 8:47 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah I don't get that

They were really aggressive on the perimeter but for some reason JWill wasn’t getting touches in the second half.

by jellisjenius on Jan 31, 2010 10:17 PM EST up reply actions  

One of the worst games they have played all season

Just awful. I am not going to blame it on the refs, because we certainly played awful. However, that one inadvertent elbow foul on Vaz late in the game was crucially bad.

Also, I cannot blame this one all on the players. Gary Williams made absolutely no adjustment against the pressing man-to-man defense that Clemson was playing. Picks and rolls? Picks off the ball?

Anyway, just a bad performance all around (sans J Will and maybe Mosley). This is just a stepping stone though and hopefully our Terps can learn from this one.

Anyway, I know it is far ahead to think about next year, but I was thinking about it today. Am I the only one who thinks we might be better off without Vaz? I am a big fan of Grevis and he is definitely a great leader, scorer, and all around player. However, I just feel he has these out of whack games every ten games or so. 9 turnovers, poor shot selection, forcing the ball, and getting two unnecessary fouls early. I love ya Vaz, but this is the type of game where a potential ACC MVP steps up and gives his chance a team to win.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by Johnny_S on Jan 31, 2010 8:54 PM EST reply actions  

Forgive my poor grammar

I was speaking off the cuff and with a bit of enthusiasm there.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by Johnny_S on Jan 31, 2010 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I know that Vaz has the occasional clunker, but you have to take the bad with the good

I’m still confident that this team is better off with him than without him. This was one game where he didn’t help, but I’m not sure he hurt, and up until that game he was the best player in ACC play.

by Ben Broman on Jan 31, 2010 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree

He is a great player. I just think next year we won’t be devastated like people think. I suppose it is an argument of consistency vs. ‘greatness’. Sometimes the greatness is undeniably important (UNC last year), but these games of inconsistency can kill you at the most important parts of the year when it is lose and go home. Games like this are easier to excuse because there it is still relatively early in the season and we are in a great spot in the standings. If this game was a tournament game or a “must win” it is a different story.

Like I said I love GV, but I don’t think this team will be devastated next year with his departure.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by Johnny_S on Jan 31, 2010 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Really?
Like I said I love GV, but I don’t think this team will be devastated next year with his departure.

With a choice of Bowie, Pe’shon, and Stoglin we will be crying for GV and his inconsistencies to make a cameo. I think your ire is a little misplaced when it comes to this game tonight. If any one of Mosley, Milbourne, or Hayes steps ups and makes a couple buckets we win that game. The team as a whole had an off night.

A little off-topic but I feel like GV legacy will be forever tarnished by the fact that during his soph. and junior years he played in a flex offense without a legitimate post presence. His freshmen year we had Gist,Osbey, and Ebekwe. His senior year we get Jwill and we are 2-3 times better than last year with pretty much the same team.

by ccrun1800 on Jan 31, 2010 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

his soph yr

we had a much improved osby and gist too.

by Sheezy on Jan 31, 2010 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

if bowie is the point guard next year maryland will be in big trouble.

by fkterp on Feb 1, 2010 5:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Really

Firstly, I think it is a tad over the top to use ire to describe my feelings toward the game. Sure, I am upset at the Terps losing in such a fashion but I am hardly angry or outraged. I know we have a good team that can play much better than that. I do not expect them to win every game.

Also, did you read my initial post where I said the entire team had an off night except for J Will and maybe Mosley? Or did you just read what you wanted to?

As far as GV goes, it is my opinion that I think we will not be devastated without him. I love everything about this site except for the fact that people are overly protective of Vaz, as if he can do no wrong. Yeah if any of those guys step up we might win that game. But if Vaz doesn’t get two stupid early fouls and have 9 turnovers we might also win that game. Everyone gets a share of the blame, not just “everyone but Grevis.”

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by Johnny_S on Feb 1, 2010 8:10 AM EST up reply actions  

FWIW

I know this wasn’t directed toward me directly, but I agree that Greivis was really bad tonight, and I said that in the gamethread after he got 2 fouls (“might be better without Greivis on this one”). I don’t think that anyone would argue that Vasquez throws out some awful games and isn’t without fault. This is the type of game that you’d expect him to take over. He definitely gets blame for the loss, as does everyone else. 9 TOs, no matter the defense against him, is unacceptable.

Because he shares the blame with everyone else, though, I’m not going to single him out. He wasn’t the sole reason Maryland lost tonight. Any one person on this team, except JWill and maybe Mosley, could’ve changed this game.

I’m not sure anyone was really defending him in this game alone, too. I can’t find anyone that said “no one but Greivis showed up tonight”. He was terrible, and that is acknowledged. But that doesn’t mean his loss won’t hurt. He was legitimately one of the best three players in the ACC since conference play started. Losing someone of that caliber will always hurt, especially when he’s a PG.

If I’m misunderstanding your point, let me know.

by Ben Broman on Feb 1, 2010 8:29 AM EST up reply actions  

What I meant, but didn't necessarily say

I think we are on the same page. I didn’t say losing him won’t hurt, because it will. I simply meant that the team will not be completely lost without him. I guess I did a bit of thinking there in my head and expected people to follow what I was thinking. My point is, that without GV next year I think our scoring will be much more balanced (kind of like it has been on the hot streak we are (were) on). I prefer more balanced scoring because the team’s offense would not depend on the ebb and flow of one player. This is just my opinion.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by Johnny_S on Feb 1, 2010 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Okay so how about displeasure

  This is the best team UMD has had in 3-4 years and you are all ready dreaming of next year. That is what really gets me. Blake , who is one of the best Pg’s ever to play at UMD, used to turn the ball over time and time again. Then we would have to rely on our press defense and/or Baxter/dixon to bail us out.

If you want to blame someone then blame Gary and his assistants for recruiting GV and taking two years off after that.

GV is this team. Just like Gilchrist was before him. I know this post sounds harsh but in basketball you win with your stars. Its one thing to give GV hell for the egg he laid last night. He deserves it every bit of it. But to say we will be better of without him and his " inconsistencies " is a tad bit harsh.

All though I am curious. How do you feel like this team will be better off without GV? I for one am dreading next year and could use a more positive outlook on the matter.

by ccrun1800 on Feb 1, 2010 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

That is college sports. You live in the now, but you always have to have your eye on the future, hence why about 50% of the posts on this site are about future prospects. So, I don’t believe thinking about this team w/o Vaz is far off base.

This team is very good, and this is the first time since 3-4 years that I have really been overly enthusiastic about the season.

Blake lead the ACC in Asst/TO ratio his junior and senior year I believe. I think you’d be very hard pressed to find a game where he had a .222 ratio. I looked it up and the most TO he had in a game was 7, but he also had 10 assists. Comparing the two isn’t very fair though because they play two completely different styles of basketball.

I apologize for saying “better off” I should have just stuck with I don’t think we will be a lot worse without him. I prefer balance over heavy dependence on one player, which is a huge reason we are so good this year is because of the balanced scoring they have shown. Look at UNC last year. They had a great balance of scoring. If someone shut out Hansbrough they had 4 or 5 other guys who could score.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by Johnny_S on Feb 1, 2010 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Last year we lost by what

30? This clemson team will always cause problems for us due to the fact that both our PG’s are extremely slow. I think we take this game at home. This is all about getting ready for the tourney ( ACC and NCAA ). We played horrible and we lost by nine at one of the toughest places in the ACC. I am upset as the next guy but I appreciate the fight this team displayed even though nothing seem to be working.

by ccrun1800 on Jan 31, 2010 9:09 PM EST reply actions  

The lesson that Vas should take from this game

Never ever talk trash about a player or team you’re about to play.
Hes done it against Duke, Memphis, and now Clemson. All of them have resulted in an ass whoopin’ by them. He just needs to be a leader and keep his mouth shut.

What kind of leader takes out his anger on the towel boy for giving him gatorade instead of a towel. Did anyone see that part? Unacceptable.

by Bboydragon25 on Jan 31, 2010 10:05 PM EST reply actions  

I don't think that had anything to do with it

I agree it’s stupid to talk trash in the press…but let’s be honest, Clemson didn’t need that, they were already pumped up. Purnell called this the most important game he’s ever coached. They came out desperate and wanted it just a little bit more than we did.

I did see that exchange with the towel boy…unfortunate. I don’t know if I’d call it unacceptable, though.

by jellisjenius on Jan 31, 2010 10:15 PM EST up reply actions  

We really caught

Clemson at the wrong time. They were pumped beyond belief. I almost think we should take that as a compliment that Clemson would get the fired up to play lil’ old UMD. With another tall/fast team coming up in FSU hopefully maryland takes this lesson onboard and doesnt let the press break them down like it did today.

Also all GV said was is that Clemson will be tough with or w/o Sitts playing. That them missing Sitts made them no less dangerous. How is that talking trash.

And the towel boy thing. He was pissed as he should have been with the horrible stinker he was having. Have you ever done anything out of anger? I sure have. As have most people. How do you know if he didn’t apologize later after the game when he had some time to calm down?

by ccrun1800 on Jan 31, 2010 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I had a feeling this would be tough...

Even without Stitt, that combination of pressure, their athleticism and relentlessness, and a rabid crowd are very tough to overcome. People are shocked by how bad we played, but the game isn’t played in a vacuum. We won’t play another game this year in that kind of environment, except at Duke and maybe at UVa. Certainly not in the postseason.

And hey, let’s give some credit where it’s due. We held them to under 32% shooting in their house. Our D was outstanding after about the first five minutes of the game.

Caveats aside, the ballhandling was what got me. Greivis was absolutely horrible with the ball and actually never seemed to find a good rhythm, he was always moving too fast or too slow. Hayes made a few bad passes, which is extremely rare for him. Mosley flat out dropped an easy pass from Vas for a wide open layup. Even JWill’s normally glue-like hands coughed it up 4 times.

You know you’ll have games where your shots don’t fall, especially on the road, but when you combine that with excessive turnovers, inability to come up with loose balls, and a few questionable calls from the refs, you have no chance.

We have started a brutal stretch…a nice bounceback W at FSU would go a long way to making up for this one.

by jellisjenius on Jan 31, 2010 10:12 PM EST reply actions  

Two positives I can take away from this game:
1. Jordan Williams will be a beast.
2. Even in one of our worst games we were in position to build a 4 point lead with 6 minutes left. And we almost had 30 turnovers. That is a testament to our defense.

Other than that I was sooooo pissed Padgett didnt get to play and lets be honest none of our players are great ballhandlers. Cliff Tucker trying that crossover was just embarrasing. Mosley looks like he is trying to dribble a 12 pound medicine ball when he is in the fast break. Also milbourne might as well cut off his right hand because he never uses it. He could have so many more layup points if he had a right hand at all. I was impressed with hayes and williams and thats it.

by MurlandTerps on Jan 31, 2010 10:31 PM EST reply actions  

Grant Murdered Us

I made the trip up from ATL to see the game. I didn’t feel the crowd was as wild as they’re hyped up to be. I know the turnovers hurt but the biggest issue I saw was Jaria(sp) Grant. J-Will did an awsome job on Booker but with Landon covering Grant, it was embarrasing. It was like last year when he would dissappear playing out of position. Grant took him completely out of the game, and Landon couldn’t keep him off the glass. It seemed like every offensive board was his. I think Dino or Padgett needed to be in there matched up on him. We would have lost some scoring with 2 bigs out there but Landon was nonexistant anyhow. All in all probably the worst I’ve seen them play this year, but Gary will light the fire and get them ready for FSU.

by ZachD on Jan 31, 2010 10:50 PM EST reply actions  

More FTs

We got back into this game by getting to the free throw line and knocking down shots. We shot 89% to their 59% at the line and if we continued to draw fouls at the end, we may have won. We take far too many shots backing away from contact instead of going up strong and drawing the foul. On the Vazquez discussion, he isn’t totally at fault since almost everyone struggled on offense outside of Jordan Williams but Vaz did miss two running bank shots down the stretch when the game was tied. Still not too disappointed considering the poor shooting, rebounding, and ball handling and barely losing. Gotta turn it up against FSU on the road.

by kreitmaster on Jan 31, 2010 11:09 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Maryland Terrapins.
Start posting about the Terrapins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
What We Learned Against Navy
Small
Lawson to Purdue
Small
New Espn Top 100
Picture_1_small
Phil Costa makes the Cowboys' 53-man roster
Ray
NEW AD
Small
Faust down to four
Small
Ater Majok transfers from UConn
Small
ACC BBall Espn Article
Picture_1_small
Ravens trade for Josh Wilson
Small
Deuce Bello+MD= ESPN Top Plays

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Share This Post

Next Game

Morgan St. Bears
@ Maryland Terrapins

Saturday, Sep 11, 2010, 6:00 PM EDT
Chevy Chase Bank Field at Byrd Stadium

Terps Could Play Three QBs Against Morgan State
Maryland Minute - 09.06.10 - Terps Win!

Complete Coverage >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

LANDOVER MD - SEPTEMBER 06:  Safety #23 Jeron Johnson of and cornerback #21 Jamar Taylor of the Boise State Broncos celebrate defeating the Virginia Tech Hokies 33-30 at FedExField on September 6 2010 in Landover Maryland.  (Photo by Geoff Burke/Getty Images)

College Football BlogPoll Top 25 Week 2: Boise State Inches Closer

Georgia wide receiver A.J. Green talks to the media during the Southeastern Conference football media days on Thursday, July 22, 2010, in Hoover, Ala. (AP Photo/ Butch Dill) +4 updates

Georgia WR A.J. Green Suspended For Four Games

Boise State quarterback Kellen Moore (11) celebrates with fans and teammates including Boise State defensive end Ryan Winterswyk (98) after winning their NCAA college football game against Virginia Tech 33-30, Monday, Sept. 6, 2010, at FedEx Field in Landover, MD.  (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

2010 Heisman Trophy Threat Level Watch: Kellen Moore Starts At The Top

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Marylandflag_small Ben Broman

Authors

Testudo_logo_small Dave Tucker

Vasquez_small Ben Goldstein