First Look at Maryland-N.C. State: Don't Know What to Think Anymore
With the one-game vacay that was Longwood behind us, Maryland's moving back to ACC play for a home game against North Carolina State, perhaps the most puzzling team in the ACC.
Had I written this preview two weeks ago, the entire tone would be completely different. That Wolfpack would've had losses to UVA and Northwestern at home, and a loss to a below-average Arizona team on the road. I would've called them a traditional Sid Lowe team: lots of talent, but still underachieving.
But things were recently starting to look up for the Wuffies. Remember, they only lost to a decent Florida team by one on a miracle shot. The Virginia loss looks better by the day. And they've performed extremely admirably the past two ACC games, beating Florida State in Tallahassee and only losing to a good Clemson team by 3.
And then, of course, they played Duke last night. Perhaps you heard of it? They completely outplayed the Dookies in every aspect of the game and walked away with a 14 point win.
And suddenly, this game becomes all the more scarier.
If the Duke game were a one-game fluke, I would feel better. But this team has seen marked improvement and solid play the last few games - this will be a real test for Maryland. I'm not saying they're normally that good - NCSt was hot and Duke was cold, that's for sure - but you have to take them seriously.
The good news is that they're probably emotionally drained. Big wins against really good teams that are also rivals? That causes an emotional letdown all while overestimating their own abilities, and I wouldn't expect Sid Lowe to be able to coach 'em out of it. As strange as it sounds, Maryland is a trap game of sorts.
That said, it'll still be tight, because NCSt has shown that they can play. Everyone knows about the awesomely-bearded, outspoken Tracy Smith (16 points, 8 rebounds), one of the ACC's best players. He'll be a tough matchup for anyone that Maryland wants to put on him, a job that will probably be shared by Jordan Williams, Dino Gregory, and Landon Milbourne. His low post moves are easily the best in the conference, but he still has the athleticism to step out and face the basket. The lack of a legitimate defensive option is really scary. They won't be able to defend him once he gets it unless they double, and maybe even then, so perhaps Gary should instead focus on keeping him from receiving the ball in the first place.
Javier Gonzalez runs the point for N.C. State, and in many ways he reminds of Greivis Vasquez (and no, it's not based on race - both are outspoken, vivacious, and flashy as hell). Unfortunately, he also happens to be Vasquez' arch-nemesis, stemming from the incident last year when Vasquez hit a shot at the buzzer when it was completely unnecessary. He's the type of guy that can give Vasquez trouble: he's small and quick, an expert penetrator with solid handles and a keen court awareness. He's not going to light up the scoreboard, but he'll dish out plenty of assists, some of which will drop your jaw. I wouldn't mind seeing Vasquez try to cover Scott Wood instead of Javy if only due to the quickness factor. Luckily, like Vasquez in his youth, he turns the ball over quite a bit, so that's one place that Adrian Bowie or Sean Mosley could have success.
N.C. State has some other solid pieces, too: Dennis Horner is an excellent perimeter shooter and their number 2 option offensively, but he doesn't make use of his size (6-9). He's not exclusively a perimeter player, but seeing him with his back to the basket is somewhat rare. For that reason, I'd feel pretty comfortable sticking Landon Milbourne on him defensively, which helps to take away the perimeter advantage he has over a lot of other 4s.
Scott Wood is another sharp shooter and a microwave scorer at the 3 (he dropped 31 on FSU), but he can be anywhere from tentative to unconscious with the ball, so defending him aggressively may help. When he gets a millimeter of space and a millisecond of time, the ball is going out, and probably going in. Stay on him, though, and he has trouble producing his own offense.
The only game I've really watched for N.C. State this year was against Duke, so maybe my sample size was small, but Farnold Degand really impressed me off the bench. He's a 6-4 ballhandler who only averages 6 a game but is unbelievably quick and a solid playmaker; a matchup with Vasquez or Mosley could spell trouble.
Julius Mays is a consistent combo that backs up Gonzalez, but he's not nearly as problematic as Javy with the ball. Richard Howell (averaging 4 and 4) is a talented freshman that comes off the bench and has a skillset very similar to Landon Milbourne's, albeit in a much more powerful body that is more focused to the paint.
The scary thing about NC State is that they're less than the sum of their parts. Horner, Wood, Gonzalez, and especially Smith should add up to a top-tier ACC team. They've started to show that lately, but no one knows how high they could go.
The encouraging thing is that NC State's success is recently founded and thus could still be somewhat fluky. On the year they haven't been nearly as impressive, so one can hope that they aren't really this good. We'll find out soon.
Even through their success, a few problems have followed the Wuffies. The biggest of the problems has been rebounding, and that's where Maryland will have to take advantage. I'm not so sure that it's a size problem, either: Horner stays on the perimeter, and Howell isn't always around the basket, either. Getting second chances and preventing them from getting second chances could make a huge difference in this game.
Here's why it's hard to attack N.C. State too much: they're balanced. They have an inside presence, outside presences, and a legitimate PG. There isn't a particularly weak part of the team. Increasingly, it seems that when one is on, all are on. At the same time, as the first part of the season showed, when they're off, they're all off.
Keep in mind that this is a team on a run. The biggest question will be if they cool down against Maryland or not. If they do, and this is the earlier N.C. State - entirely possible - then Maryland will probably win. If they don't, and this is the same team that beat Duke, well, it'll be interesting.
Was this post vague? Yes, and I apologize for it. But there's no team harder to get a read on than N.C. State - a team that has gone from worst in the conference to smashing the best in the conference in just a week's time. Things will get clearer the closer we get, but I figured I'd give some reading material early on.
There's as much parity in the ACC as any other league, and last night's game showed it. But N.C. State is an up and down team, and its time for them to go down. Not saying they particularly will, but it's possible. If it's the same team that beat Duke, Maryland wouldn't have much of a chance, and that's not fun.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
this is a home game
that is all, but “Maryland’s moving back to ACC play to go on the ROAD and play North Carolina State, perhaps the most puzzling team in the ACC” is incorrect and prob changes how you should think of this game considering the ACC is so even this year. Being at home is a humongous advantage.
by BigLevadelphia on Jan 21, 2010 10:10 AM EST reply actions
Why you bein so critical?
Dude stop flaming the posts. Yeah i was gonna comment about the home advantage, but you don’t need to take an OPINION of yours and make it as a fact and call what he had to say incorrect. You flamed the kenpom post and now this. I’m not speaking for anyone else here, but bro, why the hate?
its not flaming. This is a UMD SPORTS website. You are saying its ok to give an analysis of a game that is at home, and mistakenly say its on the road?
In response to the kenpom post, its simple. Not everyone knows who kenpom is. In fact i will gladly admit I have no clue who they are and what their website does. However, for people who dont know who it is, do you think its going to make them think thats a trustworthy source, or even any type of source that would be considered reasonably worth reading if they cant add properly?
like i said, i truly could care less, I enjoy seeing Terps content, but at what point is it not just jibberish when people cant even get home/away games correct, or are linking to sites who cant add correctly. I only even say this cause people actually seem to take this site SERIOUSLY and thats good, and if people are going to take it seriously then there should be at least some level of journalistic responsibility to uphold
by BigLevadelphia on Jan 21, 2010 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
I know I already commented on this
But I was reading an article in ESPN and they referenced KenPom. And I already explained the adding thing. Sour grapes, maybe, but I thought it to be relevant. You’re right on this one, but the KenPom one is tough to argue; I even made a post explaining it earlier. If I post it again, I’ll reference that.
But again, sorry on saying it was a road game. I accidentally looked at N.C. State’s schedule instead of Maryland – I had them open right next to each other, and it said “road”. That’s my fault.
You’re right, it’s kind of scary that we are being taken so seriously, but we’re a fan blog/fan site, not a journalistic outlet. I don’t get paid for this (well, not enough to make it worthwhile from that standpoint, FWIW). I agree that responsibility increases, but to a certain extent you have to know what we are and what we provide; we aren’t ESPN (and they make mistakes too, it’s why they have an ombud). We offer a different product, so to speak. Some people like it, some don’t.
He's critical because he's a Philly fan
that’s just the way they are. It’s like an old man with hemorrhoids. Just steer clear.
BUT, he’s right about the home court issue in this case. Home court is a huge deal in college basketball—— probably more than in any other sport. That seems like a mighty important fact to fact-check for your lead story on a news site. Especially when that site is devoted to one central topic and has a clear tilt towards Terps success.
It’s a good site, keep it up. Just need a little bit more editing!
I wasn't so mad about the Home court thing
as i was about the whole saying that the whole “nc state was the most puzzling team in the acc” note was incorrect. cause it was really just an opinion by him. As this was an analysis, he is entitled to make opinions, and to him, they might be the most puzzling teams, just because you don’t think so doesn’t make it incorrect.
for sure
and I agree that they are puzzling. I can think of only one team that is consistently more puzzling than them……
agreed
they are puzzling!!! i still think we are gonna lay the hammer down this Saturday! Being at home is HUGE this year.
by BigLevadelphia on Jan 21, 2010 10:32 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah.
I agree, and hopefully we can fill all the seats. The comcast center is an amazing advantage when its sold out.
Tracy Smith
Important to note that he did not play in their loss to Arizona and was in serious foul trouble/i believe fouled out at Wake so it is not clear whether those early losses truly show this team’s ability (imagine us without GV for two games against good compition)
Sorry guys, simple mistake
Ben made a slight mistake about saying the game was away rather than home. But the entire story isn’t on having to go on the road, but just about how NC State in general could be a problem and no one knows who this team is.
Thanks for pointing out the mistake. It’s been corrected. But no need to crazy BigLevadelphia. We’re not a newspaper with editors combing over our posts. And even big sites like SI.com make mistakes too. Recently Seth Davis said we were never ranked this year and also said Jordan Williams was a disappointment (I guess being one of the top ten rebounders in the league is a disappointment, especially when you’re also putting up 8 points a night, but I digress).
My bad, all
You’re right BigLev, for what it’s worth I didn’t mind the comment. It wasn’t critical, and you were right. It was a bad mistake.
Don't care about the mistake
I am just hoping for the “let down game” after a big win… especially when it is being played at UMD.
NC State is definitely an interesting team, though I have a hard time seeing Javy Gonzalez as comparable to Greivis. Admittedly, I haven’t seen him play this year, but based on previous years, he’s speedy but undersized, can’t consistently get to the paint (compared to GV or an Ish Smith), and isn’t a lights-out shooter (he’ll maybe get 1 or 2 deep ones per game). And worst of all, he’s sloppy with the ball. Maybe he’s improved a lot, but I’ll have to see it to believe it.
Tracy Smith is the one that worries me, we really struggled to stop him in the post last year and he’s even better now.
Well, the Duke game was the only game I've seen this year
And I have a feeling he played out of his mind.
The comparison was based more on his attitude and court vision. Yesterday he didn’t make a single mistake I can remember, though I doubt he’s that good.
Agree about Tracy Smith
He had his flashes and played maybe the best game of his life against Duke, but I am not sold on him yet. Gary needs to tell J-Williams to just play very aggressive on him. Jordan is the big body that can frustrate players like Smith.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
Sagarin and Pomeroy
Not to jinx us, but both Sag and Pom have Terps as 11-12 point favorites. I say Terps by 9, with a back and forth first half, and the Terps making a run mid-second half to put it away. Jordan Williams gets a double double, Vasquez gets his usual 18 with bad shot selection but a ton of assists, Mosley has a big all-around game, and Dino Gregory gets the bench.

by 












