Did Last Night Usher In the James Padgett Era in College Park?
I'm sure it's a question on plenty of people's minds. Did James Padgett's performance against Longwood - admittedly, Longwood - when compared to Dino Gregory's finally ensure him a spot in the rotation?
Eh....maybe.
Last night was the first time that both Padge and Dino saw significant minutes against the same opponent (the differential was four, the previous closest was in Dino's second game back, when Padgett played 6 fewer minutes). Dino basically came in and took Padgett's minutes in entirety, only recently starting to hand them back before Padgett barely saw the floor against Boston College. Beforehand, Gary called it an important game for Padgett, indicating to me (and some others) that this could be a major factor in playing time down the line.
Test: passed.
Padgett played for 20 minutes. Dino played for 24. Obviously, that in and of itself is far from an indicator of Padgett rejoining the rotation. However, with a four minute disadvantage, Padgett produced 4 more points and the same number of rebounds against the same competition. That comes shortly after Gary wanted Dino to produce more. There could be something to this.
I rewatched some sections of the game, mainly those in which Dino and Padgett scored. Padgett seemed to look better in the middle portion of the game - he needed the early and-one to get some confidence built up and start being more aggressive in the post. That said, he had the prettiest post move I've seen from anyone in a Maryland uni in quite some time in the second half, a beautiful little drop-step spin move leading into a layup.
His free throw shooting still needs (a ton of) work and he's still tentative at times, but he has the potential to be a major contributor. No big on Maryland has anything in their arsenal close to that move, and scoring .5 points a minutes (that's 20 per 40, math majors) isn't shabby either.
Obviously, this is Longwood. Some people are destined to easily beat poor competition while struggling against better competition (Jin Soo Choi, anyone?), and that could be him. But he did moderately well against Wisconsin and Cincinnati before getting his minutes reduced against Villanova and Indiana, and PT will be necessary soon.
At the same time, Dino Gregory plays an important role, and it's not like he was chronically outperformed. 4 of his 6 points came on ultra-energizing putback slams, and he had 3 blocks. He's an energy guy, someone that can come into a game and provide a boost defensively, add experience, and make some hustle plays. He's not, however, the first guy off the bench, and probably never will be. At this point, neither is James Padgett, but he has that potential.
That's one major reason I'm not really all that disappointed with Dino's play. He's been playing a role that just doesn't fit him well. He's playing more minutes with different expectations from last year, and it's not suited to his strengths. Unfortunately, that's the role that Dino's been forced into playing. Take away some of his minutes, and maybe he starts to go back to that previous mindset.
Really, though, there are no Dino people or Padgett people (at least, there shouldn't be). Both need to be on the floor a lot. No team can make it through ACC play easily with one inexperienced center and two undersized PFs. Unlike some others, I don't particularly believe that Dino needs to get off the floor, but rather that Padgett needs to get on it more. He's not going to be perfect, but the development will come in handy down the stretch, and the first time Jordan Williams and Landon Milbourne get in foul trouble, he'll have to be in anyway.
Obviously, I'm not a coach. If I was, I wouldn't be writing this (actually, if I was a coach, I would so have a blog, so ignore that last statement). Maybe there are other reasons for Dino's play, and maybe there are other reasons for Padgett's absence. If there are, then those need to be taken into account.
No, Padgett won't start overtaking Dino because of this game. But he proved he belonged and could make a difference, I'd be a little bit surprised if his playing time doesn't start chipping away at Dino's, getting close to 50/50 - and that's not a bad thing, for anyone involved.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Dino/Padge comparison is nice, but to me the bigger story was Jordan Williams and his steady development into a true star. He was a force, especially the first 10 minutes. He was nimble, he was scrappy. He even got a steal at midcourt. He seems to pick up confidence with each game, and so far has been improving steadily as the season has progressed.
I like having shot blockers down low, but Dino is far from a seasoned one, and it appears to leave him more likely to commit fouls, be out of rebounding position, and surrender easy put backs.
I, too, would like Padgett to get more minutes because he, gasp, actually boxes out. And that post-move thing too.
shot blocker
we should get eric mknight. the added plus is that he is from MD. we need to start keeping these guys here.
Am I the only one...
who isn’t a huge Padgett fan (yet)? So far, to me, he seems lost when out on the floor. His skills are still way too raw, and on offense he hasn’t done anything at all to wow me even remotely. He reminds me of a poor man’s Ibekwe in the fact that every time he gets the ball he tries to force something on offense and looks awful in the process. Dino over Padgett is a no-brainer in my opinion at least until Padgett shows more.
Yes, you must be.
Yes, we were playing Longwood, but how can you say Padgett is raw when compared with the way Dino played against the same opponent last night?
Yeah...I guess I should clarify
My comment wasn’t made to sound like I’m a huge Dino fan. He doesn’t really impress me either, but I do think right now he is better prepared and has shown more throughout the whole season than Dino. Offensively, his shot is decent compared to Padge. I guess we will find out as the season goes on. Not writing Padge off, but he definitely needs some time to develope.
Right now
Dino and Padgett are different stages in their college careers. Dino’s role will continue to be energy/hustle off the bench, while Padgett will at some point develop into a first man off the bench/fringe starter. I think as the year continues, we are going to see more plays from Padgett that will wow us. Be patient, he’ll have his chances.
But at this point, how much different are they? Neither one is an offensive asset, both are somewhat liabilities from the foul line, and are in the game to give us some quality minutes/rebounds and to provide some depth when the starting bigs get into foul trouble. It’s fun to debate right now, but let’s just be thankful that we can be having this conversation (as opposed to the situation faced last season).
by NYCTerp86 on Jan 20, 2010 10:04 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Dino is by no means a liability at the foul line.
He’s looked smooth there all year. In fact, he’s shooting 82.4% from the line, which is even better than Vaz (with many fewer attempts, mind you). Still, he’s been at the line enough this year to call him a better-than-decent foul shooter.
Just watched the NCSt win over Duke 88-74 as I wrote this
As to James and Dino, both are most comfortable offensively and defensively around the basket. So neither one is a particuarly good sub for Landon. James is worse because he doesn’t have any idea how to play defense away from the basket. At this stage he watches players as they drive past him. But, he does a decent job holding position underneath, getting two hands on rebounds, and scoring from time to time so he should be able to sub for Jordan for short periods. I agree with others that too often he looks like he is afraid of making a mistake rather than playing by instinct. I’d like to see James run the floor full speed a few times in transition. He doesn’t play for that many minutes and can easily raise his energy level. As to Dino, he is not good on perimeter defense but he can compensate with hustle as others have mentioned. It is the scoring we give up without Landon that is the problem. If he could just hit a jumper from time to time, it would keep defenses honest. For some reason he has started throwing a flat 12-15’ jumper. Maybe he needs to get one of the managers to stand on a step ladder with a tennis racket to force him to get arc on his shots.

by 















