"We tried to get Greivis coming off the inbounds pass with a handoff. He was supposed to go, and there were two guys on him and I guess he didn't see anybody open so he took the shot. You want to put the ball in the hands of your best player if you can in that situation. At least, I do. He's been clutch his whole career, he's made the big shots, he's done a lot of things."
about 2 years ago
Ben Broman
8 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I mean, I agree with Gary's thoughts. But the way Vasquez played last night, the shot should have gone to Hayes
by callmecostanza on Jan 13, 2010 10:33 AM EST reply actions
Vaz was 9 for 27 from the field.
When you take 27 shots, you should hopefully have more than 30 pts. Off night shooting for Vaz. Should have penetrated and dished to Eric or someone else for a better shot.
But I am a Vaz lover, and I don’t fault him at all.
True, but...
He also had 7 assists and 4 rebounds…he did have a really low field goal % but he also came through with some serious scoring at the times we most needed it. I’m obviously not saying he is without fault, but he is pretty much the main reason we are competitive right now. If we didn’t have him, where would we get the bulk of our scoring from?
And how many turnovers?
7, to answer that question.
Greivis is vital to the success of the team, yes. But he has a tendency to force shots in certain situations that he has no business taking (early in the shot clock with a hand in his face). He sometimes forces the issue too much, getting the team into trouble. Several of his TOs and missed shots led to easy Wake baskets on the other end.
I’m extremely proud of the way the team performed last night, but I’m just a little worried that Greivis is taking on too much of the load. This isn’t last year. We have a better supporting cast (i.e. same old Milbourne, more consistent Hayes, improved Mosley, JWill), so Greivis doesn’t need to carry the team on his back AS MUCH as he did last year.
Which is what I was trying to say.
I just always word thing wrong.
by callmecostanza on Jan 13, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions








