Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Missouri Survives Scare, Louisville And Marquette Roll

ACC Roundtable, Week 4 - Out of Conference Woes Continue

Week four, folks, and this time our host is new SBNer BC Interruption. Read on:

Now that most ACC teams' non-conference schedules are winding down and we are starting league play, it's time to take the vitals of the ACC's play in non-conference action. Here is how the ACC fared against the rest of college football through 4 weeks (based on my back-of-the-envelope math):

BCS Conferences

vs. Big East 2-2 (.500)

vs. Pac 10 1-1 (.500)

vs. Big XII 1-2 (.333)

vs. SEC 0-2 (.000)

The Rest

vs. I-A Indep. 1-0 (1.000)

vs. MAC 1-0 (1.000)

vs. Conference USA 2-1 (.666)

vs. Sun Belt 1-1 (.500)

vs. Mountain West 1-2 (.333)

vs. FCS 9-2 (.818)

Overall 19-13 (.594)

Comment on your team's (if applicable, sorry Miami) and the conference's non-conference performance through 4 weeks. As a conference, what head-to-head record against another conference stands out to you most?

Sorry, ACC. I know we let you down. First the shellacking from Cal, then sneaking over JMU in overtime, then the MTSU loss, then the five turnovers against Rutgers....our bad. We certainly didn't help matters.

As for the second part of the question, the one that should stand out the most is the two losses vs. FCS teams, which shouldn't be acceptable by any standard. It was nearly 8-3, too. That's one of the main (and many) reasons the ACC is no longer viewed as a premier football conference.

Star-divide

(Because we like to fan the ACC vs. Big East flames ...) The only BCS conferences the ACC has a .500 record against so far this year is the Big East (4 games) and the Pac-10 (2 games). Yikes. In a weekend where 2 of 3 Big East teams knocked off ACC teams, we have to ask. The ACC is still > Big East, right? Right??

Depends on how you judge a conference. The Big East still doesn't have a team that can stack up against Virginia Tech or Miami (sorry, Cincy), but their bottom half is better than the ACC's (well, except for Louisville, who would be a nice matchup for Virginia). Overall, the Big East is more balanced, but the ACC has more premier teams. Take that for what it's worth - for right now, I'm saying the Big East is slightly better, but the ACC still tops them in basketball.

On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is losing to a CAA team and 10 is getting the ACC some much needed street cred by winning the BCS MNC, how satisfied are you with your AD's non-conference scheduling this year? With the non-conference opponents your program has lined up over the next few years, will you be more or less satisfied?

Considering 1 is a CAA loss, I'd have to say Maryland's 3 point overtime win over James Madison is probably a 2.  Maybe a 2.5. Combine that with the Cal game and losses to MTSU and Rutgers at home, and it's not exactly impressive. That said, I'm pretty satisfied with the schedule. I know I wouldn't have changed anything, except maybe make JMU a worse team, like Howard. Other than that, I can't complain about a top-tier team, a mid-tier team, and a low-tier team. Good balance.

Next year actually looks awesome - well, if Maryland is any good, that is. A game against Navy in Baltimore is great and should become an annual matchup, and it's great to see the West Virginia-Maryland rivalry renewed, albeit in Morgantown. If the Terps can at least be competitive, those games would not only give a lot of cred, but also be entertaining.

Last one, ESPN's College GameDay is heading to Chestnut Hill this week for Florida State (2-2) at Boston College (3-1). Both teams are unranked. Parts of the blogosphere are going completely ape s**t over the WWL's selection. Justify the selection (if you can). If not, tell us why you dislike the selection.

Pretty tough to defend this one. FSU could be a good team, or they could be terrible. Considering it's away, they'll probably beat BC handily, but neither of these teams are truly marquee. I suppose you could argue that it highlights the ACC and there won't be a lot of opportunities to do that, but couldn't that have been done with the VT-Miami, which actually looked like a good game that would've drawn a national audience? It makes even less sense when you consider the other possible matchups this week: LSU-Georgia, Miami-Oklahoma, USC-Cal, even Michigan-Michigan St. That's a pretty good choice, which makes the BC-FSU matchup all the more puzzling.

Comment 0 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Testudo Times

ACC Blogger Roundtable, Week 3

Sep 2009 by Ben Broman - 0 comments

Around SB Nation

ACC Roundtable #4

Nov 2008 from From The Rumble Seat - 0 comments

ACC Roundtable #3

Nov 2008 from From The Rumble Seat - 0 comments

ACC Roundtable Wrap-Up

Oct 2008 from From The Rumble Seat - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Maryland Terrapins.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

6a00d834518eba69e200e5518f7a478834-800wi_small
Catching Up With Dino Gregory
Small
Jason King knocks Turge
6a015432d86661970c0162fd02b74d970d-320wi_small
Update on Diggs
Small
Rivals Top 10 Spring Scouting Prospects
Small
7'5 Mamadou Ndiaye
Small
Let's hear it for the Girls
Small
Catching Up With Hawk Palsson
Small
Duke or UNC?
Brady_lead_small
Don't look now: General Grievis is going off
Small
The Hawk flies tonight [ed's note: Tianna, not Palsson]

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Share This Post


Managers

Testudotimes_small Ben Broman

Authors

Garyland_logo_small Dave Tucker

Mensbasketball-1024_small Ben Goldstein

251084_1429730463099_1227960970_31127493_2195273_n_small Pete_Volk