Maryland Sneaks By JMU: It's a Win, But Worries Remain
Bottom line: it was a win. I was among the masses that wanted a blowout, and this didn't satisfy that desire. But it could've been much worse: it could've been a loss.
Much like the California game, it didn't really break one way. You can't flat out say Maryland showed nothing positive in the game and Ralph Friedgen should be fired immediately...well, you can, but you'd be wrong. Likewise, you can't view the win as a win and write off the performance.
I'll be frank: Maryland probably shouldn't have won this game. If JMU had a decent kicker, or if they didn't commit 105 yards of penalties, or if they didn't - for some reason I am still yet to grasp - share phenomenal QB Drew Dudzik's time on the field with Justin Thorpe, James Madison probably wins the game.
Both the offensive and defensive lines were manhandled by smaller, less athletic players. Sure, the OL was without Bruce Campbell, but they were facing a much smaller opponent, and one with less natural talent. There were several occasions when Chris Turner had to make a hurried throw and was under pressure, and there was a gaping lack of holes for Da'Rel Scott and Davin Meggett. That hurts Meggett especially - he's a downhill, run hard type of back, and needs holes to succeed.
Defensively, there was nothing up front. James Madison put up a ridiculous 268 yards on the ground, and much of the blame goes on a virtually invisible defensive line. There was never any penetration into the backfield, and they put up an O-fer in the sack category to boot.
Really, the defense as a whole was just demolished. Dudzik put up 141 yards through the air, a modest number until you realize it was done on only 9 completions, but 268 is the number to remember. The demolition on the ground will be difficult to forget. 417 yards is way too many to give up to an FCS team.
The performance in the second and third quarters is hardly encouraging, either. After a rushing touchdown very early in the second quarter, the next half of the game went like this for the Maryland offense: punt, punt, punt, interception, punt. The whole team just didn't show up for an entire half of the game. It wasn't just poor play - they were out of it mentally, too. They got lucky today - if they take two quarters off against Clemson or FSU, they won't come back.
Perhaps the worst part of it all is that James Madison isn't even an FBS team. We can talk all we want about the CAA, the ACC, and whatever other acronym you want to bring, but the fact of the matter is that they aren't what could be described as a "quality opponent", even if it's only because of that label. It's definitely a psychological negative that Maryland got outplayed by a D-IAA team.
Okay, so there doesn't sound like there's any reason to be optimistic. But don't worry: there are several.
First and most importantly, they fought back. Yes, they got down, yes, they looked like they weren't there for several quarters, and yes, they gave up 22 straight points. But through all that, they came back and won. There were a lot of times they could've given up: after James Madison took the lead, for instance, or after Dudzik broke a 70 yard run. They didn't, they persevered, and they fought back to get it to overtime. It's a cliche, but that will come back to help them later on this year.
While I already addressed the lines, it's important to note that the OL is seeing some improvement. There was only one sack today, for example. Scott had a few lanes to hit during OT. And during the final few drives, they started to keep JMU out of the backfield on both the pass and the run. That probably had a lot to do with a smaller JMU team getting fatigued, but I'll take what I can get with this group. There are still a lot of negatives here, but there are some slivers of hope that they're starting to come together.
If they are truly gelling, or at least getting there, remember how talented Maryland's skill players are. Torrey Smith made it clear today that he can be a gamechanger. Adrian Cannon caught a TD pass. Ronnie Tyler had an amazing 4th down conversion (and also a huge 3rd down drop, but that's a discussion for another day). There's no doubting the talent level of Da'Rel Scott or Davin Meggett. Give Turner some time to find them or Da'Vin Sceggett (?) some holes to run through, and the offense could be dangerous.
On defense, it's still early. It's a new scheme with a lot of new starters, and these issues were to be expected. I don't think anyone expected them to be this bad, but it's feasible that they just aren't used to playing aggressively. At the very least, the jury should remain out for another two weeks or so.
Also, keep in mind that JMU is a good FCS team. The Dukes are a legit team in the same conference that houses teams that easily beat Duke and Virginia. I'm not saying they just beat USC, but JMU is a quality football team. The FCS label hurts mentally, no doubt, but in reality, they may be better than several FBS team.
The slow-starting principle still applies in week 2, too - Maryland lost to MTSU last year in the second game, and JMU would put up a great fight against them, if not win, if they were to go head to head.
I'll be the first to admit it's not a very convincing argument for remaining calm. But it's better than what I could come up with after Cal, which rested on historical anecdotes. The play is slowly but surely coming along, but a lot of work still needs to be done.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
congrats on the win
ugh. i can’t believe we lost that game. too many mistakes early and couldn’t get you guys off the field for a bit, but from the beginning of the 2nd quarter on we dominated that game. our offensive line manhandled you guys and our d line did a great job of applying pressure. your strategy of going wide early was a smart move, we weren’t ready for it.
dudzik is our man, thorpe looks like he has potential but dudzik has some serious skills. our rushing offense was punishing. 60 more total yards, more TOP, no turnovers, and yet we lost. special teams and penalties were the killers.
now i’m not going to pin this loss on the refs, but there were 2 egregious calls/non-calls in the 4th qtr. up 7 with the ball driving, around 7 mins left, we had a 20 yard run that put us at the md 38 or so called back due to a holding. i was seated right at the 40 and actually videotaped the play on my camera, and there was absolutely no holding on that play. mickey matthews was so incensed i was surprised he didn’t get an additional penalty. from 1st down on your 38 (& probably causing you to burn to’s) to 1st and 16 from our own 34 or so was a dramatic shift in momentum. then a couple plays later after an incompletion our wr was hit helmet to helmet.
ah well. i’m sure there were other calls that could have gone both ways but those two happened at such a crucial juncture in the game.
the folks tailgating around us were first class all day, lots of jmu purple as well. the staff in the suites were top notch as well. other than our terrible special teams play, it was a great afternoon. we should have signed the kicker from halftime to kick for us.
by hoboken_dukes79 on Sep 13, 2009 11:55 AM EDT reply actions
It was a good game
You guys came out and put up a hell of a fight. If not for penalties, you win. The first call you mention, the hold, was 50-50. Looking at the ESPN360 replay, it was a hold, but it didn’t need to be called. As for the helmet-to-helmet hit, it didn’t matter – JMU called a TO before that play and it didn’t count anyway. That’s why you had 6 downs – first down, the hold, second down, that play, third down, punt.
Dudzik is a gamer and your rushing attack will be tough to stop. Best of luck the rest of the season.
you’re right, helmet to helmet didn’t matter. we were out of synch all game and penalties held us back, it was just that one that i had issue with.
i also didn’t like jmu’s conservative playcalling at the end of the game. our kicker was out with a concussion during the middle of the game and it was clear he was going to be shaky at best all evening. going to OT we’d be at a distinct disadvantage. would have liked to have seen us really try to score before the end of the game.
by hoboken_dukes79 on Sep 14, 2009 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions
You guys have a great team, no question about that. I’m not sure about those calls you are referring to, but the Dukes certainly committed a lot of procedural penalties. I don’t know if it was the QB’s inexperience or the noise or what, but you guys would have won without so many of those.
Glad to hear you enjoyed it and that you were treated well. You can’t say the same thing about fans traveling to West Virginia or some other schools. I think you guys have a great season and playoff berth ahead of you. Good luck.

by 











