2009 transfer prospect

by soloist27 on Jun 30, 2009 10:39 PM EDT

Matt Pilgrim

Matt Pilgrim is taking a transfer visit to college park tomorrow. Got the info from terpcenter.com. hes between 6'6-6'9. was a star at Hampton then transfered to Kentucky. Calapari didnt renew is scholly. he looks pretty good on youtube. anymore info on how serious he is about college park??? If hes serious then hes taking a schooly from a potential stud for next year an he only has 2 years left.... i dunno man.

Anything deemed inappropriate will be deleted by an admin or moderator with the power to do so. The views of the above FanPost do not represent the beliefs of Testudo Times or Testudo Times' authors, nor are they the work of them.

Tweet Comment 5 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

I think we ahould take him

Osby was pretty good, maybe he’ll be another one of him

by terps721 on Jun 30, 2009 10:48 PM EDT reply actions

Probably better than Osby

Pilgrim was supposedly outperforming Patrick Patterson in UK practices. Take it for what it’s worth.

by Ben Broman on Jun 30, 2009 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions

Def take him

I see your point about possibly stealing a scholarship, and while that was one of the first things that crossed my mind, I don’t think that’ll be a big deal.

I would have a problem if he was a wing, because then TJones, Harris, Leslie, Parker, and Coleman are all suddenly disinterested. But he’s a 4, and we have very few legit prospects at the 4/5 spots for 2010. There’s Graham, who is good but not there yet, and Tsafack, who’s a project, and the rest are big-time tweeners. Most of those tweeners, with the exception of Weatherspoon, would rather be a 3. This might actually help us with them, because it shows to them they’ll have PT on the perimeter.

by Ben Broman on Jun 30, 2009 11:17 PM EDT reply actions

for sure

on nbadraft.net, they compare him to Al Harrington. But I wouldn’t take him if it hurts our chances with Harris, Jones or Leslie.

by Terpsfan2189 on Jun 30, 2009 11:51 PM EDT reply actions

Quite the opposite

They probably want some proof from the coaching staff that they won’t be fulltime PFs and be stuck in the paint all the time. We can show them JWill, Padge, and Pilgrim, and they can rest pretty assured that they’ll have some sort of freedom.

by Ben Broman on Jul 1, 2009 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions