Early Look at Cal
It's just been a quick look at the stats, but I'm getting a feel for how the Cal game is going to play out. We should have a Q&A session with the guys over at California Golden Blogs again, which will shine some more light on their team. Just by looking at stats, though, you know exactly what Cal is: a shooting team.
They are the best team in the nation at 3 pt %, by far. They have about a 2% over the #2 team. They can shoot the lights out. They're almost as good as Maryland is from the stripe (about 1% behind) and they're tenth in the nation in FG%. Maryland, by comparison, is 241st.
The stud of the team is Jerome Randle, who's averaging a solid 18 ppg, most of which comes from beyond the arc. He's a great shooter, which is surprising because he's only 5-10. You'd imagine he'd have trouble getting his shot off, but he doesn't. He's put up 171 threes and drained 80 of them, for 46%. Bowie has four inches on him, and I've yet to find anyone - maybe Ty Lawson - who is significantly quicker than Bowie is, so that's my guess as to who'll guard him. There's a chance Mosley could, as well, because he seems to be the lockdown defender of the team. I'm not sure how good the rest of Randle's game is, but he's 50% from the field. That's either a deadeye shooter or a lot of layups.
Theo Robertson is half automatic from downtown, shooting 49%. Cal's SG, Patrick Christopher, shoots a refreshing 37% from three; that's about what Jon Scheyer shoots. When the bad shooter is Jon Scheyer, you know you're in for some trouble. All this obviously adds up to no zone. They'll gladly shoot right over it. It's a shame, because the zone worked pretty well the past few games (minus Duke), but you gotta know when to give it up.
There's a gigantic positive about Cal, though; they're small. No, Maryland doesn't have an advantage - their center is 7-0 - but there's not a significant disadvantage, which is ****ing amazing after the we've gotten so used to it in ACC play. Cal has no low post game to speak of. That 7 footer must be soft, because he only averages 4 rebounds a game. Maryland has stood toe-to-toe with - or outrebounded - teams with massive size advantages, like Wake. Cal averages about 2 rebounds more than their opponent per game; Wake averaged 6, UNC averaged 7. If the entire team commits to rebounding, like the Wake game, it could get ugly on the boards. Guys like Vaz, Mosley, and Bowie, who rebound well anyway, should have it pretty easy. As soon as a three goes up (and there will be quite a few) everyone needs to turn to the basket right away and box out.
The one thing that struck me about them is that they're very similar to Duke. They're a bit more focused on the three, but they lack size, and their big guy is soft (or just sucks, both of which perfectly describe Zoubek). Cal doesn't have the athletes Duke does, but they beat Duke's shot.
Maryland needs to do three things to win this game: 1) make easy shots - there'll be a lot of mostly uncontested runners in the lane, as Cal's blocks total is just horrible, 2) rebound - if it's a team effort, Maryland could get a lot of second looks and limit second chances for Cal - give them two shots a three, and there'll liable to hit it, and 3) get out on shooters - if Randle and Robertson go up for a shot with no one in their face, they're money; if they're contested, there's a chance they'll miss. If those happen three happen, Maryland should win on Thursday, or at least give Vaz a chance to take the game over. Granted, these are just stats; hopefully I'll get a chance to talk to the Cal bloggers and see what goes deeper than the numbers.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Tough game to predict
I wouldn’t be surprised to see zone mixed in. Sure Cal shoots well from 3-pt land, but you only get shots against a zone if you move the ball well. Gary will mix it in and make cal run an offense. Cal, I’m guessing likes to push tempo, because that’s how you get open threes. A zone can slow down a team like that, or, better yet they start jacking up quick threes just because they are facing a zone. Would I expect zone for the whole 40 minutes, no. But we still need to mix in zone to be effective imho.
Rebounding is impossible to predict, but if maryland guards come in with the same rebounding intensity they showed in the acct, at the very least rebounds shouldn’t hurt us. Make no mistake about it though, I don’t care who this team plays, rebounding has to be a total team effort. I don’t expect it to be a problem.
maryland needs to play aggressive half court defense as California can be turnover prone (Randle has 98 turnovers this year). Maybe a little full court press mixed in could help us get some easy buckets.
My main point is that Gary has a lot of tough choices. Let’s not pretend we know more about how to stop three point shooters than he does. I suspect that whatever strategy we employ, it will give us our best chance of winning
P.S. on the turnover thing
If you look at Cal’s losses, you’ll notice that you can’t really say that randle didn’t shoot well…
However, in almost every loss, except for 2, his assist to turnover ration is either below 1:1 or hovering right around 1:1.
So the teams that beat cal, don’t let randle run the offense and distribute the ball, and put pressure in his face and cause him to turn the ball over.
If I were gary, I’d let bowie man mark him, and have grevis keep an eye on him, sagging off a less effective scorer. The combination of grevis’ length ready to poiunce in his passing and shooting lane, and bowies quickness should give him fits.
So in the end…I expect a match-up zone similar to what we ran against duke in the first half to a lot of success. man mark the 3pt shooters and put the rest of the guys in a passive zone with an eye on getting in the passing lanes and blocking shots more than an eye on their man. Make the weak links beat you and try to frustrate their threats.
by tiimbitz4786 on Mar 15, 2009 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions
We’re actually a horrible up-tempo team. The best way to think about Cal is that we play a very mid-major type way. Move the ball. Take good, open shots. Try not to force anything (and Randle jacking up 30’ 3-pointers actually isn’t forcing it – he does have that range). Play smart, play hard. We actually, despite being a Pac-10 major conference team – don’t have great athletes – except Patrick Christopher.
As for our center, Jordan Wilkes, yes, he’s soft, but he’s actually quite a productive offensive player. He too can shoot the jumper (not quite as good as his dad, Jamal Wilkes) and he came on very strong over the last 10 games of the season.
Our best rebounders are in the Duke mold – Jamal Boykin – who is actually a Duke transfer and Taylor Harrison – who was having knee issues, but is a super annoying gritty/dirty defensive specialist big man.
Turnovers are actually pretty easy to force on Cal. Aside from Randle, we don’t have another above average ball handler (except maybe Niokla Kenezvic, who has been buried in Monty’s rotations).
I was gonna say that
Very half-court team, Cal is. Maryland doesn’t do well against mid-majors, unfortunately.
If that's the case
I wanna see some full court press…they turn it over too much…
by tiimbitz4786 on Mar 16, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I actually think Cal does a pretty good job
of breaking down the full court press. We’ve had spurts where our guys get very flustered and do some stupid things bringing the ball up the court (See: OSU), but there have been quite a few times where teams have pressed us and they move the ball upcourt pretty efficiently.
The X-factor for Cal
is probably Jorge Gutierrez. I haven’t seen too many of your games, but just looking at the stats, it seems like Gutierrez is much like Vasquez in terms of the intensity he brings when it comes to rebounding. He’s always flying all over the place over 6’10 guys to fight for a board. He’ll also probably get the assignment of guarding Vasquez, when he’s on the court (he comes off the bench, but sees a considerable number of minutes). Guts isn’t much of an offensive force, but you’ll sometimes see him handling he ball more to allow Jerome Randle to get open off the ball.
I know CGB is doing a Q+A with you guys, but one question I had: What’s Maryland’s X-Factor? What’s the one thing that gives Maryland the edge that Cal fans won’t know about just by looking at the stats?
Thanks! And let’s hope for a great game!
Gary Williams
Gary Williams could be the best big-game coach in America, at least when his back is against the wall. There are times he doesn’t show up at full force (UVA, Morgan State, even the first Duke game) but the UNC, Mich St., and Wake games were due plenty to him. When he perceives some slight, he’s incredibly determined. I hesitate to say that Maryland wouldn’t have a chance against Memphis – should they get there – simply because he’s the coach. Make sure you don’t do anything to piss him off.
Zone from the Cal fan's perspective
There are 3 teams in the Pac-10 that run zone exclusively: Oregon St., Arizona St. and Arizona
Against Arizona in particular Cal destroyed them from 3, especially the 2nd time, when Jerome Randle hit 8-11 on 3s and the team shot something like 13-24 for the game.
ASU was more of a mixed bag. Cal did really well passing through the zone in their first matchup for the win, but played with no passion and shot horribly in the 2nd game, which they lost.
OSU, who plays a 1-3-1 zone, confused and bothered us in both games and won both, damaging our NCAA seed in the process.
So the answer appears to be that it depends what zone you run and how you run it…which I guess isn’t very helpful. But timmbitz is correct about bothering our ball handlers and forcing turnovers. Cal doesn’t have the defense to win if they’re constantly turning the ball over.
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
Mostly a 3-2 zone
Screwed up a few ACC opponents. Didn’t do too much against Duke. I guess the question would be what ’Zona or ASU run.
Box and 1...triangle and 2...is more likely
like i said…it will be a match up zone like what we played against duke in the first half when they didn’t shoot very well from beyond the arc (other than singler).
It’s really a crapshoot. We just need to throw different looks at them everytime they start to get in a groove. If they aren’t sinking their shots, we win though…that’s the good thing.
Even if they are…we still have a chance as i don’t see an answer to vaz in the lane on the other end.
by tiimbitz4786 on Mar 16, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Fouls on GV will be huge
Probably the most obvious comment of the past week, OK…I want to see GV w/ plenty of minutes though. If Hayes and Mosley keep up thier offenseive aggression we could be pretty unstoppable offensively. Wonder who backs up Lurch in the paint for them if we get him into foul trouble? Would doubt it is another 7 footer…
They have a 7-3 dude from China
But he doesn’t play much. I think the first guy off the bench is 6-8.
I think Arizona runs a 3-2
but I don’t think that tells you much…they’re really awful defensively and I don’t think any scheme would help them much
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
Also, to let you guys know, Jerome Randle is 5’10 in heels on a couple of phone books. I’ve stood behind him in a line for fast food: He is 5’7 at the most. He’s the quickest little dude when he’s fully healthy, but doesn’t penetrate that often for some odd reason. Oh, and he’ll shoot the three from anywhere past the midcourt line… He almost always shoots the ball from 4-5 feet beyond the arc.
HYDROTECH IS FREE!
Pressure may work on him, then
A 1/4 court man would have some trouble getting up on him, then. At least 1/2 man would be required.
just promise me something
don’t complain when we inevitably play zone…
it’s gonna happen, and it’s smart…even if you don’t recognize it….
by tiimbitz4786 on Mar 16, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Won't complain (unless it doesn't work)
But I’m going to be guarded. Expect an “Uh oh, zone’s coming…let’s see how it fares” because that’s a big change and risk against a team that shoots so well from three. I won’t be saying “Switch to man!” unless they hit a couple of threes in a row. If that never happens, of course I wouldn’t want to switch back to man right away.
don't generalize the term zone though
3-2 zones are sometimes very effective at defending the perimeter…so much so that many coaches will switch to a 3-2 at the end of a game to protect against the three…
match up zone, triangle and two and box and one can also be very, very effective against a perimeter team.
There are two types of zones that we play, an aggressive 3-2 zone and a sagging, match up zone. I think we’ll see a little of both.
by tiimbitz4786 on Mar 16, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions

by 












