Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Worst Team Ever Projected?

The Immediate Future of Maryland Basketball: Must-Wins Already?

Maryland basketball is sitting a crossroads for this year way earlier than they wanted to reach it. In the next two weeks, they will play two games that will, in all likelihood, decide their season. It's not a stretch to say that the next two games - actually, all remaining OOC games entirely - are games Maryland has to win, unless they plan on having an amazing conference run.

Here's what Maryland's looking at in the next month, with two games (W&M and UNC-G) following them:


Terrapins Basketball Schedule

Every year, people talk about teams that, despite good records, don't get into the tournament because they have no great out of conference wins. Thanks to losses to Cincinnati and Wisconsin, unless Maryland beats Indiana and Villanova, they'll fall into that same trap.

Indiana isn't so much of a good win as it would be a bad loss. The Hoosiers are still rebuilding, and while they'll be back in a couple years, they're not close yet. They're still bottom three or four in the Big Ten, so even though it's an away game, the RPI boost will be minimal and claiming it as a resume win is tough. Another loss against a team that low would be a lot to overcome without a major win. If they lose to Villanova as well, you could probably finish off the year at that.

Star-divide

Nova's the make-or-break game, this year's version of Michigan State. They aren't who we thought they were (almost lost to George Mason) and they're missing key components (Reggie Redding, Mouphtaou Yarou) but they'll almost certainly turn it on at the end of the year for a nice RPI boost. Just like MSU last year, Maryland could be getting them when they're most beatable, and then, when they plow through the Big East, the win would look amazing.

Without Redding and Yarou, Villanova...still completely outclasses Maryland at every position. And unlike Michigan State last year, they're proven at most of their positions, most of all PG with Scottie Reynolds. Winning that game will be very difficult, but it's also very possible. Everyone will have to be clicking and Nova will have to have a bad day, but if George Mason is an Isaiah Armwood 3 away from victory, Maryland can pull it off.

They win both of those games and win out the OOC schedule, and they'll enter conference play at 11-2, with one big resume win and one very minor resume win, along with no bad losses. Put up a 9-7 year in the ACC to get to 20-9, and a couple of ACCT wins will probably still be necessary. Go 10-6, and as long as they win in the first round of the ACCT, their ticket will be punched.

If they lose to Villanova, 10-3 with no resume wins completely changes it. I still think that a 10-6 year probably gets them in along with one or two ACCT wins, but is that really realistic? They'd also probably have to top both UNC and Duke at some point to prove they can beat the best of the best.

Now, it's still too early to do this type of stuff in any detail - it could be a weak field, like last year, and it would be significantly easier to get in. Maybe Maryland goes off in ACC play and dominates, and this is all rendered worthless anyway. But right now, it seems like these two games could well decide Maryland's tournament hopes.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Really?

Wow, “has to win”? “Make or break”? Sorry, there’s not much evidence to back up those assertions…not in the ACC at least. The only team in recent ACC history not to make the tourney with a winning conf. record was Virginia Tech in 2008, and that was a questionable decision to leave them out IMO. Miami, who went 8-8 and didn’t really have any great OOC wins that year, got the at-large, probably because they beat VT head-to-head.

Anyway, I think 9-7 is certainly attainable this year in ACC play, and 10 or even 11 wins would not be shocking given our experience and improved frontcourt. Losing the Indiana game would be bad, no doubt, and losing both would be devastating, but I have to disagree that it would end their postseason hopes. The committee does tend to punish teams that play a weak OOC schedule, but not so much teams that play a tough early schedule, struggle, then improve late in the year. I think you’re going a little too far in the way you characterize the importance of these games.

by jellisjenius on Nov 27, 2009 3:40 PM EST reply actions  

Yup

The last post took the words right out of my mouth. Did you learn anything from last year? We lost to Virginia and still made the tournament. UMD will do well in conference and they could make a run in the ACC tournament. So stop with this pessimistic talk of must-wins. Beating Indiana I agree is important, but Nova would just boost our chances. Neither game is a must-win. It’s 5 games into the season: calm down.

by UMD2012 on Nov 27, 2009 3:53 PM EST reply actions  

Hey, everybody...

Wayyyyyyy too early to be making any predictions like that at all. Who knows whats gonna happen? It’s a crazy-ass season. If last year didn’t prove that, I don’t know what will.

P.S. I miss Dave Neal and his awkward playing style/celebrations.

by kckb8 on Nov 27, 2009 4:11 PM EST reply actions  

Re: last year

We beat Michigan State OOC. W/o that win, we’re not in. If anything, last year should reinforce the thought that having a resume OOC win is very important. Two different viewpoints, I guess.

Still, I realize that no one knows what the hell a must-win is until after it’s happened, but these games are ridiculously important, more important than most conference games IMO.

by Ben Broman on Nov 27, 2009 5:37 PM EST reply actions  

Just saying

that any of the scenarios you described above just won’t happen. We can’t say that MD will be in with 10-6 and this OOC win and this ACCT performance etc. There’s too many other factors that play into it to be saying this stuff.

Fun to speculate, though. I enjoyed the post. Just my opinion.

by kckb8 on Nov 27, 2009 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Apples and Oranges...

Last season, we were 7-9 in ACC play, so of course the MSU win was needed. My point was that a winning ACC record, even 9-7, most likely overcomes early-season deficiencies in OOC play. If, as I suspect, Cincy and Wisconsin both end up being in the top 20-30 teams at season’s end, those wins won’t look bad.

Your points about the importance of these games are valid, I just thought you exaggerated the repercussions a little.

by jellisjenius on Nov 28, 2009 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Maryland Terrapins.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Manster!
Img_0429_small
Stefon Diggs VS Harrison Twins
Small
According to Josh Barr, Diggs to Maryland
Small
Shaq left off of McDonald's All American Roster
Small
WBB: Maryland at Clemson 2/9
Small
duke steals game from UNC
Small
ACC Men's Basketball Strength of Schedule
Small
Did we win or lose last night?
Small
Our Lady of Good Counsel
Small
More on Stefon Diggs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Share This Post


Managers

Testudotimes_small Ben Broman

Authors

Garyland_logo_small Dave Tucker

Mensbasketball-1024_small Ben Goldstein

251084_1429730463099_1227960970_31127493_2195273_n_small Pete_Volk